[AT]Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K, i5-10600K CPU Review - Page 15 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community
Forum Jump: 

[AT]Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10900K, i7-10700K, i5-10600K CPU Review

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #141 of 142 (permalink) Old 06-02-2020, 05:15 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Martin778's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 1,508
Rep: 17 (Unique: 17)
Quote: Originally Posted by 8051 View Post
So how does the HEDT i9-10900x stack up against the i9-10900k? The i9-10900k appears to have more L3 cache (19.25MiB vs. 20MiB). Is the only difference going to be in number of PCIe lanes and quad channel memory?

Although I seem to remember reading here that the i9-10900x was a lousy CPU?
Aren't Intel's HEDT SKU's always a generation(or should I say - a refresh or two) behind the mainstream ones? If I recall correctly the HEDT are simply unlocked Xeons, having a higher memory latency for example.
I've went through the lineup 7920, 7980xe, 9940x and to me they're all 'lousy' because of their power draw and temperature delta between cores.

Threadripper 3960X @ broken PBO EDC=40 | Aorus TRX40 Xtreme | Enermax Liqtech II 360 TR4 + EK Clear flush + 3x Noctua A12x25 | 4x8GB G.Skill TridentZ Neo 3800C14 @ 3733 CL14-15-15-30 CR1 | EVGA Kingpin 2080Ti @ 2115MHz / 8250MHz + Noctua A12-25 | 4x1TB 970 PRO raid0 | Corsair MP600 2TB | Seasonic Prime Platinum 1300W | In Win D-Frame 2.0 Gold | ASUS PG349Q
Martin778 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #142 of 142 (permalink) Old 06-03-2020, 11:09 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Nizzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,020
Rep: 71 (Unique: 57)
Quote: Originally Posted by Martin778 View Post
Aren't Intel's HEDT SKU's always a generation(or should I say - a refresh or two) behind the mainstream ones? If I recall correctly the HEDT are simply unlocked Xeons, having a higher memory latency for example.
I've went through the lineup 7920, 7980xe, 9940x and to me they're all 'lousy' because of their power draw and temperature delta between cores.
Overclocked x299 cpu's with 4000mhz tweaked memory is very good performance, if you have enough cooling Stock x299 cpu's with slow memory sux. The performance difference is crazy!

My 2.5 years old delidded 7980xe @ 4600mhz all core with 49ns memorylatency (4000c16 twekaed) is faster than 3950x max overclocked on water in every scenario. Pretty good for a ancient cpu

In gaming it has no chance vs my new 10900k @ 5400mhz and 4600c16 tweaked memory. ~35ns memorylatency.

For rendering, I still use my old Threadripper 1950x 16 core @ 4ghz Still going strong!

Powerdraw is not on my concern list

CPU24/7) 7980xe - 7900xMOBO: ASUS Rampage Apex x299 / Asrock Taichi x299RAM: 4x 3600c15 / 4x4266c19/ 4x4000 c17 GPU: 2x MSI tri X 2080ti / 1060tiSTORAGE: Areca 1883i HDD R6 + Samsung 850PROs R0 - 3x SM961 nvme 1TB - 3x Intel Optane 900p 480GBCASE: LD cooling V8 R/B / ld cooling reverse R/BMonitor: Acer x34 /Asus 27 AQ 4k g-sync / Asrock x570 Taichi / 3900x
Nizzen is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off