Computerbase does the best benches these days . Does no favor to either side. Gamegpu.ru is also non biased but their methodology is absolutely trash.
Perhaps Frametime is more accurate results but it is not uncommon to see the big gap between FPS and Frametime. It just means 1080 had lot more peaks, doesn't mean results are off.
It could very much be that, since the gpu latency is not working correctly, they have made a syntax error. It would be the easiest explanation why the cpu latency is higher than overall frametime latency, when it is not possible in principle because it would just set such a value as the dominant framelimit.
Come on guys let the Amd trolls have their "one game" of glory. They get punished in everything else so let them just have this one. Is their bragging silly and annoying? Yes. But if you were in their shoes you would be thrilled too. Its like the ******ed kid who wins one match out of 40 in Ping Pong. Let them enjoy this.
From Oxide Aug 2015 - "We are working with NVIDIA to enable asynchronous compute in Aots on NVIDIA GPUs. We hope to have an update soon."
Even the "DX12 standard" that is Time Spy shows no Async on Maxwell cards.. Pascal may get a bump in the future, but the writings on the wall as far as Maxwell goes.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Ask a question
Ask a question
Overclock.net
27.8M posts
541.2K members
Since 2004
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!