Originally Posted by Shaded War
I doubt anyone is skipping this because of CoD and RDR. There have always been CoD games releasing near Battlefield and it never decimated sales like this. RDR is a completely different style game that isn't even on PC, yet most PC gamers are not buying BF5.
Exactly what I think too.
I was really expecting Bad Company 3 or a real successor to BF4. BF4 is still such a great game with so many weapons, attachments, maps, etc. A huge upgrade to that with modern warfare (not the game) would be amazing. Instead, they went back to the tired old theme of WW2.
BF1 looks amazing graphics-wise, but I didn't like it at all.
It boggles me as to how DICE/EA didn't create Bad Company 3 when BC2 was arguably one of the best FPS games of all time.
1.) WW3 setting or Bad Company 3
2.) Best graphics (upgraded from BF1)
3.) Gore (like Wolfenstein Colossus)
4.) 128 player maps (64 vs 64) with TDM, Rush, and Squad DM especially CQC like several BF3 maps.
One of my favorite games was FEAR and the online multiplayer was just amazing - red mist everywhere, constant blasting.
The biggest retard move they made with BF1 is not having 64 player TDM and Rush - why the hell did they remove that? Conquest is slow and boring.