[Eurogamer] Witcher author demands more money from CD Projekt - Page 6 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[Eurogamer] Witcher author demands more money from CD Projekt

Thread Tools
post #51 of 55 (permalink) Old 10-05-2018, 04:30 AM
New to Overclock.net
HarrisLam's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,739
Rep: 38 (Unique: 37)
Quote: Originally Posted by Newbie2009 View Post
Give him a million bucks and be done with it.
I think he deserves a million from settlements before he pulled the legal action threat card.

After that though, I think CDPR is ready for a fight if he really wishes to go that direction.

I am a Lamprey. I suck. <--- If you like this......You are probably a Lamprey.
HarrisLam is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #52 of 55 (permalink) Old 10-05-2018, 06:08 AM
New to Overclock.net
New green's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 439
Rep: 39 (Unique: 29)
Article 44. In the event of gross discrepancy between the remuneration of the author and the benefits of the acquirer of the author's economic rights or the licensee, the author may request the court for a due increase of his/her remuneration.

Lawyers for Sapkowksi claim in a letter CD Projekt Red reposted on its website that Polish copyright law entitles him to more royalties based on the now large discrepancy between what the studio originally paid him and how much it has gone on to profit from the copyright. Citing Article 44 of Poland’s 1994 copyright law, they write, “[Article 44] may be invoked when the compensation remitted to the author is too low given the benefits obtained in association with the use of that author’s work.”
For its part, CD Projekt stated it’s also interested in keeping its relationship with the author of the source material on good terms. “It is the Company’s will to maintain good relations with authors of works which have inspired CD PROJEKT RED’s own creations,” it said in the post on its website. “Consequently, the Board will go to great lengths to ensure amicable resolution of this
dispute; however, any such resolution must be respectful of previously expressed intents of both parties, as well as existing contracts.”

If I am understanding this correctly both parties with renegotiate on a new table of remuneration based off of previous intent and existing contracts which I am assuming gives the author the right to a new lump sum.
New green is offline  
post #53 of 55 (permalink) Old 10-05-2018, 12:03 PM
New to Overclock.net
EniGma1987's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,307
Rep: 338 (Unique: 248)
SC Projekt should just renegotiate and say that he can have 5% of all profits from new Witcher games, then focus only on new IP and never make another Witcher game. lol

EniGma1987 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #54 of 55 (permalink) Old 10-05-2018, 12:55 PM
New to Overclock.net
PharmingInStyle's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 144
Rep: 1 (Unique: 1)
I think I'd mostly go for a royalty agreement if I created art projects. You never know which ones if any will become a hit. Not saying I'd do that for any paintings I made. I mean for paintings you generally sell each one for normal painting prices in a gallery if you're not famous. But after hearing about all this with the Witcher series I'd ask for royalties for any novel I'd write and take the risk of running short on rent by turning down normal lump sum payments.
PharmingInStyle is offline  
post #55 of 55 (permalink) Old 10-07-2018, 05:35 AM
New to Overclock.net
Thingamajig's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,610
Rep: 138 (Unique: 122)
Quote: Originally Posted by SuperZan View Post
Unless he's lying, he did get money. "I was stupid enough to sell them rights to the whole bunch," he says. "They offered me a percentage of their profits. I said, 'No, there will be no profit at all - give me all my money right now! The whole amount.' It was stupid. I was stupid enough to leave everything in their hands because I didn't believe in their success. But who could foresee their success? I couldn't."
And now it was successful, he wants a piece of the pie. His arrogant dismissal made him shut out a potential opportunity. He got what he wanted, an agreement was made a long time ago.

He doesn't deserve a penny, and to give him anything sends a terrible message; Kick and scream to get what you want in the age of entitlement.

A message too commonplace in todays age. He shouldn't get a dime. If he didn't crawl back under the rock he came from i'd be taking legal action get him there faster.

(10 items)
i7 7700K
ASUS ROG Strix z270i ITX
Zotac 1070 Mini
Corsair Vengeance LPX (2x8GB) DDR4
Hard Drive
2x 2TB Seagate Guardian Barracuda 2.5"
Hard Drive
M.2 Western Digital Black 256GB
Optical Drive
Panasonic UJ-265 SATA Slot Blu-ray Writer
Power Supply
700w Silverstone SST-SX700-LPT SFX
Heatkiller v3 CPU Block
Cougar QBX Mini
▲ hide details ▲

Last edited by Thingamajig; 10-07-2018 at 05:39 AM.
Thingamajig is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off