Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - View Single Post - [Technopat] Ryzen R9 3950X Breaks WR's Cinebench15/20 & Geekbench4

View Single Post
post #75 of (permalink) Old 06-14-2019, 03:09 AM
SwitchFX
New to Overclock.net
 
SwitchFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 747
Rep: 14 (Unique: 11)
Quote: Originally Posted by elmor View Post
Highest R15 scores on LN2 below

1950X @ 5370 MHz = 4514cb
https://hwbot.org/submission/3622692..._1950x_4514_cb

2950X @ 5489 MHz = 4758cb
https://hwbot.org/submission/3921708..._2950x_4758_cb

9960X @ 5928 MHz = 5320cb
https://hwbot.org/submission/4168151..._9960x_5320_cb

Compared to:

3950X @ ~5400 MHz = 5344cb


Slightly higher frequency than Zen1 but over 18% higher performance. Slightly lower frequency than Zen+ but over 12% higher performance. Same performance as Intel Core i9-9960X but at 9% lower frequency.
I'm not one to nitpick at others representations, but using percent here feels a bit disingenuous to most consumers even though this is an enthusiast site. As you pointed out, there is a large, significant difference in score from the TR1 chip, however, for the Intel processor, there's over a 400 Mhz difference which shows just how much of an IPC improvement there is with Zen 2 over Intel. I'm not sure if this comes down to using the TSMC process or because 12nm and 14 nm on GloFlo was a highly modified mobile platform on licensed tech from Samsung. Unfortunately, that stuff is way out of the breadth of knowledge I know so I'm open to anyone who knows it to explain why apart from that and the modification of how IF works that AMD managed to best Intel, obviously based on what we know and not third party benches.

SwitchFX is offline