Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - View Single Post - USERBENCHMARK WEBSITE

View Single Post
post #5 of (permalink) Old 07-27-2019, 05:25 PM
Buris
Spaghetti
 
Buris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,003
Rep: 42 (Unique: 34)
What's complete madness is the fact that MOST games and applications made today use 6-8 threads, so you'd think with this recent development they would have emphasized quad core more strongly, or perhaps added an 8-core score (unrealistic), either way, the wrong move seems to be exactly what they did.

The i3 9350K beats the i5 9400, R5 3600, and even the i9 9980XE. They had to break their algorithm to put Intel in the top spots..... Shame.

Real-world performance clearly shows that the 9350K is insufficient for most recent games and applications, but yet here it is, in one of the top spots.

Userbenchmark also took a decent metric (30% SC, 60% QC, 10 MC) and turned it into an abominable (40% SC, 58% QC, 2% MC)

If they would have adjusted it to just 40% SC, 55% QC, 5% MC, people probably wouldn't have caught on, but considering this benchmark now puts an i3 ahead of an i9...

Userbenchmark is a complete joke.

MARS
(18 items)
CPU
Ryzen 9 3900x
Motherboard
Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
GPU
EVGA 1080 Ti FTW3
RAM
G-Skill Sniper
Hard Drive
WD EMAZ001
Hard Drive
WD Black SN750
Power Supply
EVGA G3
Cooling
Noctua U12A
Case
NZXT H500
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10
Operating System
Pop! OS
Monitor
BenQ XL2730z
Keyboard
Aukey Mechanical
Mouse
Mionix Castor
Mousepad
Aukey
Audio
PreSonus Eris E3.5
Audio
SennHeiser 598
Audio
Blue Yeti
▲ hide details ▲
Buris is offline