[EE]Quantum Dots to Shrink MicroLED Display Pixels - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[EE]Quantum Dots to Shrink MicroLED Display Pixels

 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-11-2019, 10:59 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
EniGma1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,057
Rep: 327 (Unique: 240)
[EE]Quantum Dots to Shrink MicroLED Display Pixels

Quote:
Nanoco Technologies and Plessey Semiconductors have partnered to shrink the pixel size of monolithic microLED displays using Nanoco’s cadmium-free quantum-dot (CFQD quantum dots) semiconductor nanoparticle technology.

Using its existing gallium nitride (GaN)-on-silicon monolithic process, Plessey will integrate the CFQD quantum dots into selected regions of blue LED wafers to add red and green light, shrinking the smallest practical pixel size from today’s 30 µm to 4 µm, a reduction of 87%. The process will enable the production of smaller, higher-resolution microLED displays in applications such as AR/VR devices, watches, and mobile devices while enhancing both color rendition and energy efficiency.

...

Lee said the quantum dots are applied onto microLED arrays using an inkjet process, for which the two companies will file a joint patent. “Quantum dots offer the best solution for today’s emerging display requirements," Lee said. "The nano-sized emitters with narrow band emission make them a suitable solution for Plessey’s microLED display roadmap, which will see pixels being driven down to 4 µm in size in 2019.”

Source




Interesting that they claim such a great size reduction and going from 30um to 4um. Samsung already demo'ed 10um size MicroLEDs and others have already demo'ed smaller, so the tech can already reach these sizes. Though Samsung's mass produced MicroLED size is closer to 30um because they both have no need to go smaller and if they go smaller there will be a lot of blank space between pixels.
Really the most important thing I see from this article is the inkjet process technology used to print the MicroLED in a similar manner as LG and JOLED use to product OLED panels. Though as Mand12 pointed out, this still has an issue of being printed on massive pieces of silicon which cost a lot more than other panel types.

EniGma1987 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-12-2019, 02:35 PM
Robotic Chemist
 
Asmodian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,386
Rep: 177 (Unique: 117)
For VR I can see this being a big improvement. VR is where we need these ridiculous pixel densities and self emissive displays are great for VR. Piecing together many entire wafers to make a large display seems expensive but you could probably make enough headsets out of one wafer to make them somewhat affordable.
Asmodian is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-12-2019, 07:55 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
tubers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,417
Rep: 50 (Unique: 46)
Hope they find a way to improve panel uniformity with this.

It's absolutely annoying playing the panel lottery.
tubers is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-12-2019, 08:33 PM
Frog Blast The Vent Core
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 5,950
Rep: 367 (Unique: 181)
Huh. Really is the better part of a decade for this to make it's way to the private sector, then. Saw 8 micron pixels with 2 micron subpixels using quantum dots in around 2011 in microdisplays for government use. You don't want to know how much they cost...

Won't be useful for TVs, since you're talking about 50 wafers for a 75" display.
Mand12 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off