[TechSpot] Thousands of Amazon workers are listening to your Alexa conversations - Page 10 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[TechSpot] Thousands of Amazon workers are listening to your Alexa conversations

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #91 of 92 (permalink) Old 04-18-2019, 08:35 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
TranquilTempest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,640
Rep: 77 (Unique: 62)
Quote: Originally Posted by UltraMega View Post
Generally speaking, there is no real evidence that they are.
Public companies are legally bound to work in their shareholders' best interests. Turning down money because it would be unethical is rarely in that playbook. Turning down money because it would be illegal is more often, but not always effective.
Quote:



This is bad reasoning. Anytime you ask something unfalsifiable in a debate, you know you have a weak point. In an actual debate, this would be a very poor tactic and you would probably lose your argument. It's also just bad reasoning. There are always bad guys out there in the world, yet statistically speaking everything gets more peaceful over time. If we bring math into this there is strong evidence to suggest that whatever issues there are related to data mining would have an even smaller negative impact in the future. Just saying "how do you know it wont get worse?" with no reasoning as to why it should, is just a bad argument. It's the kind of argument you get a lot from these.. sky is falling down types.
We're arguing about what precautions we should take to mitigate known and unknown risks. It's not "sky is falling" it's "we're sliding down a mountain, maybe we should grab onto something". Hell, with these voice recognition systems in place, if a government agency wants to spy on you, they don't have to break into your house and plant bugs, they just send Amazon, Google, or Apple a national security letter.
Quote:


It violates international laws and there would be a trial overseen by the UN. Guilty parties go to jail. Or maybe war? Or maybe the companies just say no because they know they could never operate in the US or any other allied nation if they did anything like that and got caught. People go to jail over mishandling private data all the time.
Lets take a look at China, Google already went back on a promise to not censor their search results, and were hiding data collection practices from their own privacy team.
Quote:


If you're running for office and you have some kind of criminal record that you're trying to hid, I have no sympathy. I think society has already decided that our leaders should be held to higher standards. Also, ya know... it would be illegal and if you did that to your competitor you would just go to jail. If I put a hidden camera in your house and then show the footage, it doesn't become OK just because you're running for office. It would be a very obvious crime.
Talking about audio, not video. The crime isn't in releasing recordings, but recording people that don't know about it(different laws depending on state. It would shock me if they haven't broken some states' wiretapping laws "unintentionally".) This kind of stuff is buried in the terms of service nobody reads. Doesn't even have to be anything breaking the law, maybe you had a conversation ten years ago about whether people with downs syndrome should be allowed to reproduce.
Quote:

And I've got a bridge to sell you if you think that have people at their company working on identifying individuals and building up personal info about them. Could they figure out how to reverse engineer the data mining process and start tying names to anonymous data points, sure... but people who build billion dollar tech companies don't do it to make relatively small amounts of profit off data mining, and they don't risk going to jail over what would just be a distraction from their main profits anyway.

Why oh why doesn't all this data targeting happen all the time and how can anyone think it won't be the Skynet death of us all in the future? Well because its illegal to do those things and historically speaking, good wins over evil. If that changes we are all screwed anyway so it's a non-issue.
Um how exactly are they supposed to target ads to you if they don't know who you are? And good doesn't win over evil, the winner just gets to write the rules.
Quote:

Just dont buy an Echo if this really bothers you that much.
Was given an echo once, re-gifted it to someone that already used them.

TranquilTempest is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 92 (permalink) Old 04-18-2019, 01:24 PM
Old to Overclock.net
 
xJumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,992
Rep: 109 (Unique: 96)
Quote: Originally Posted by UltraMega View Post
Instead of saying that data collection has been used to target innocent people/civilians all these times that people don't know about, just prove it. Link some kind of proof, and not an article that talks about the proof without presenting it, the actual proof. I would be very interested to know about it if this has actually happened.
Quote:
According to the documents, the NSA and its British counterpart, GCHQ, are using the small tracking files or "cookies" that advertising networks place on computers to identify people browsing the Internet. The intelligence agencies have found particular use for a part of a Google-specific tracking mechanism known as the “PREF” cookie. These cookies typically don't contain personal information, such as someone's name or e-mail address, but they do contain numeric codes that enable Web sites to uniquely identify a person's browser.

In addition to tracking Web visits, this cookie allows NSA to single out an individual's communications among the sea of Internet data in order to send out software that can hack that person's computer. The slides say the cookies are used to "enable remote exploitation," although the specific attacks used by the NSA against targets are not addressed in these documents.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...?noredirect=on

I know, I know you'll say that's not proof because it doesn't actually say it in writting that they have used that to target individuals but if it did you would probably call it fake news or something. Like another poster here said it's like you're asking for a signed confession.

If all this stuff exists, you really think it's for poops and giggles and it's NEVER been used against someone... Lol.

You know in science they use this concept to prove theories. They deduce that if the environment for something to exist does exist and that all the condition for X thing to happen are ripe for it to happen, it therefore must happen even if they can't see X thing actually happen.

Quote: Originally Posted by looniam View Post
are you serious? you demand a ridicules amount of proof, practically a signed confession with three sources and yet go on a fantastical rant of conjecture. one laughable point is the U.N. doing anything.
Lol this.

You know in either side of this debate, nobody actually has malicious intent. Here in the U.S. anyway all this clandestine espionage metadata gathering isn't malicious in intent, they do it because they want to help protect the country. The problem is the way in which they go about this, there's two sides really. There's those that believe the infringement on privacy is a necessary evil to help secure the modern world and in reality it does help to a certain extent and has stopped threats. Then there's those like myself and many here that believe that it's an infringement on personal rights (which it is) and would rather live in a slightly more dangerous world but with more freedoms. It's become apparent here that many of the supporters of the metadata collection are the "good government" types that believe in just world theory. Unfortunately my life experience has taught me that the latter isn't true and bad guys win all the time.

Anyway that's enough for me, I've already broke my cardinal rule of internet'ing. Don't engage in poo flinging contests, thoughtful debate yes but senseless poo flinging contests of people yelling over each other, forget that I'll go do something that actually betters myself. There's no point trying to "convert" anyone, we live in the information age; the evidence is out there so take your pick.

362436
(15 items)
CPU
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard
Asus Prime X370-A AMD Ryzen AM4 DDR4
GPU
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 950
RAM
2x Corsair Valueselect 8GB 288 Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 @ 2133
Hard Drive
Corsair Force LS 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC SSD
Optical Drive
Lite-On 24X SATA DVD/RW Optical Drive
Power Supply
Corsair RM550x 550W 80 Plus Gold
Cooling
Noctua NH-L9A-AM4 Low-Profile
Case
Antec NSK4100 Steel ATX Mid Tower
Operating System
Mint 18.2 x64
Monitor
HP 24" LCD/LED 1920x1080
Keyboard
IBM PC-AT
Mouse
Logitech G5
Audio
Sennheiser HD650
Audio
Asus Essence STX II
▲ hide details ▲


xJumper is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off