Originally Posted by bst
I was going to do one when I get the black knight shell, so I can show both at once. Although, the click are the same as in that video.
Its all good, nice latency, I'll have to test the DPI again because I can't find the results now, I just done a quick latency test and it consistently scored 5ms faster than the Venator. This was with the full-fat firmware, I could maybe improve it with a barebones firmware with minimal code. I remember a while back I done a test and it was faster, but that was a more basic FW, but also I think maybe I've just got better at testing them. I use the bloody PK test, what I do is find a spot where LMB of mouse 1 and RMB of mouse 2 have good contact, then I tap them together about 100 times in a row, quite hard, so theres no advantage given to either mouse. The results are usually very consistent like this so I think its ok: https://imgur.com/a/13cGYVM
Edit: I wish you could export the results from that PK test, then I could make an average from like 1000 clicks, but there doesn't seem to be a way :/ shame.
You can use qsxcv's program (a.exe) for that: https://www.overclock.net/forum/375-...s-lightly.html
Mice currently owned: Logitech G402/G403/G303/G Pro, Zowie FK1/EC2-A/EC2-B/ZA12, Razer Deathadder 2013/Basilisk, Cooler Master Mastermouse S/MM530/MM520, Roccat Kone Pure Owl-Eye, Dream Machines DM1 Pro S/FPS/DM3 mini, EVGA Torq X3/X5, Ninox Venator, HP Omen 600, Thermaltake Ventus X RGB Optical/Ventus R, Microsoft WMO, Steelseries Rival 310, Nixeus Revel, Ozone Neon M50
Looking to buy and try: Ninox Astrum