[ZOL] GK110 and possible GK110-2 information - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community
Forum Jump: 

[ZOL] GK110 and possible GK110-2 information

Thread Tools
post #1 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:30 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
Mhill2029's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Intel Fabrication Lab
Posts: 11,030
Rep: 873 (Unique: 579)
The core has a the 550mm2 core area, the horror of 60 million transistors, the L2 cache from Fermi 768KB, GK104 of 512KB substantially increased to 2MB-bit wide across the 384bit direct reach to 512bit , said the performance level of at least than GK104 high 50 The GK110 already in March, stream films, the amount of production time should be not far.


Source: ZOL.com

It's a translated link so apologies if some information isn't too coherent.

Intel Core i7-6950X @ 4.0Ghz
Asus Rampage V Extreme [Bios:3101]
4x EVGA GeForce Titan X SC Editions in SLI
2x EVGA 1080ti Hybrid FTW3's in SLI
32GB (4×8) Corsair Dominator Platinums (3000Mhz)
Hard Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB M.2 Nvme
Hard Drive
2x 256GB Vertex 4 SSD (RAID-0)
Hard Drive
2x 2TB Seagate Barracuda [Storage]
Optical Drive
Pioneer BDR-207DBK Blu-ray Writer
Power Supply
Corsair AX1500i Digital ATX 80 Plus Titanium
Corsair H105 (Push/Pull)
Lian Li PC-O8WX ATX Cube Case
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro x64
2x 27" Asus PG278Q ROG Swift 144hz
Logitech Z906 5.1 Surround
▲ hide details ▲
Mhill2029 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:35 AM
New to Overclock.net
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 393
Rep: 27 (Unique: 24)
Bigger die can mean better heat transfer.

35211 kb/s | 16622 kb/s
overcrash is offline  
post #3 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:46 AM
New to Overclock.net
george_orm's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 572
Rep: 33 (Unique: 31)
And more power !!! biggrin.gif

george_orm is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #4 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:49 AM
New to Overclock.net
toX0rz's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NRW, Germany
Posts: 638
Rep: 28 (Unique: 27)
On paper, if it turns out the 50% performance advantage over GK104 are true, it could possibly compete with AMDs upcoming HD 7990 (~375W) while only pulling between 250-300W and even being a single GPU, that would be amazing.
toX0rz is offline  
post #5 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:51 AM
New to Overclock.net
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oz & US
Posts: 1,206
Rep: 132 (Unique: 129)
The GTX680 has 1536 Cuda cores, not 1636 like in the image.
mdatmo is offline  
post #6 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 01:53 AM
Blameless's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 30,088
Rep: 3135 (Unique: 1869)
Originally Posted by overcrash View Post

Bigger die can mean better heat transfer.

Not at similar heat density.
Originally Posted by mdatmo View Post

The GTX680 has 1536 Cuda cores, not 1636 like in the image.

Yes, that's a typo.

...rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual. -- Thomas Jefferson
Blameless is offline  
post #7 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 02:20 AM
Enter Plasma
SHNS0's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,631
Rep: 58 (Unique: 50)
2304 CUDA cores, 6 billion transistors, 50% moar power than a 680, 4gb vram (or so it was suggested in another article) for 650$?
Uh... COOL. (Yeah, not much of a reaction, but it was really hard expressing myself without using profanity).

Current Projects:
Devotion: a Hardcore Shift X.
Blood Inside: a Luxury, Budget Meshify Mini.

"Quality means doing it right when nobody is watching."
(12 items)
Intel i9 9900k
Asrock Z370 Fatal1ty ITX
KFA2 RTX 2080 OC
Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4 16GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 EVO 1TB
Power Supply
Corsair SF750
Custom Watercooling
Phanteks Shift X
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Alienware AW3418DW 34"
Logitech G513
Logitech G Pro Wireless
▲ hide details ▲
SHNS0 is offline  
post #8 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 02:57 AM
New to Overclock.net
marduk666's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montréal,Canada
Posts: 1,435
Rep: 29 (Unique: 28)
moarrrrr powerrr!!!

marduk666 is offline  
post #9 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 03:00 AM
Retired Staff
Murlocke's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 17,094
Rep: 912 (Unique: 541)
250-300W? Isn't that more than a 580?

I was so happy with power consumption of my 680... but I know ill grab the 685 when it comes out.

The Leviathan
(12 items)
Intel i7 9700K
ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero
11GB NVIDIA 2080Ti
32GB G.Skill Ripjaws V (DDR4 3200)
Hard Drive
1TB Samsung 960 PRO
Power Supply
Corsair AX860
Noctua NH-D15
Corsair Obsidian 750D
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro x64
65" LG 65E6P (4K OLED)
Ducky Zero
Logitech G502 Proteus Sprectrum
▲ hide details ▲

Murlocke is offline  
post #10 of 55 (permalink) Old 03-27-2012, 03:17 AM
New to Overclock.net
Hukkel's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dutchland
Posts: 3,716
Rep: 107 (Unique: 76)
50% more performance for 100$ more?

How incredibly unlikely. If it would be 50% more performance we'd pay at least 50% more gold coins.

Hukkel is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off