[Coolaler] AMD Piledriver FX Vishera Engineering Sample Benchmarks - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[Coolaler] AMD Piledriver FX Vishera Engineering Sample Benchmarks

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:39 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Metric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 203
Rep: 41 (Unique: 35)
Quote:

areless received from the meters in the country sent a mysterious little box ~

CPU-Z-ah ....... Han bowl of cream, I do not know!
According to the sender that the first batch of ~ This is A pile-driver pile driving machine Piledriver engineering samples has been handed the mill hands ~

This had to sell the old stems!! Palindrome did the younger brother of Pobai ~ plate and pipe to help move to the new district.
Why??? ... Because there will be no test data

Cpu deity photos ... tomorrow to make up ~ work today, came close to being the boss chasing play, so hurry. Less COPY photo ~ "~~

388039_17278158284702obsbt.jpg

185938_499298813418108jsr5.jpg
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/185938_499298813418103_1139833792_n.jpg

536766_1727915561793652s89.jpg


Cinebench 11.5
329375_49942158007249ltshe.jpg
http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/329375_499421580072493_1898386655_o.jpg rest of the benches (Click to show)


Source

Source (Translated)

AMD Engineering Sample, ZD338251W8K54_39/33/22_2/8

3.3GHz base clock/3.9GHz turbo, which would peg this as the lowest of the three FX-8 Vishera CPUs.

An FX-8300 @ 2.2GHz NB, with DDR3 1333MHz. The Aida64 bench shows what appears to be DDR3 2400 memory clocked to 2520 CL9 1.65V "easily."

The user stresses this is an early batch ES. However, this will almost certainly be the retail stepping and fab process will not have changed much, if at all, once retail parts are on sale.

mod e: keeping the custom thread title since the translated one makes absolutely no sense.
Metric is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:40 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Metric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 203
Rep: 41 (Unique: 35)
IPC is never static across the range of workloads, so those who used the Trinity results as a sign that 15% is a representation of average increases, should realize that was never going to be realistic. If the Cinebench R11.5 bench is correct, you're looking at an IPC increase shy of 10% (mid-high 9s) in CB.

Using an extremely crude estimate, based on the CB results, would see the FX-8 series look somewhat like this in CB Multithread.

FX 8300 score @ 3.3GHz = 5.73 —replaces— FX 8100 score @ 2.8GHz = 4.62

FX 8320 score @ 3.5GHz = 6.08 —replaces— FX 8120 score @ 3.1GHz = 5.04

FX 8350 score @ 4.0GHz = 6.95 —replaces— FX 8150 score @ 3.6GHz = 6.01

Those numbers are not in any way exact (including the Zambezi scores) and should only be seen as very rough estimates. Other similarly crude Vishera estimates, see the FX-8350 somewhere in the range of 7.22 or so in CB Multithread.


While different configurations and testing methods can not be directly compared, here are some CB results from different sites.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/6
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1914/9/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/53054-intel-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-cpu-review-11.html

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
44769lgs7e.png

cinebench-x33sl5.jpg

ivybridge_3770k_696tswg.jpg



—edit—

AMD Eng Sample, ZD338251W8K54_39/33/22_2/8

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 M5A97 EVO R2.0 User's Manual - Page 91http://www.manualowl.com/m/Asus/M5A97-EVO-R2.0/Manual/295316?page=91


fx8300-piledriver-visrls3b.png

Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Quote:
3.5.1 The items in this menu show the CPU-related information that the BIOS automatically detects. The items shown in this screen may be different due to the CPU you installed. UEFI BIOS Utility - Advanced Mode CPU Configuration Exit Main Back Ai Tweaker Advanced\ CPU Configuration > Advanced Monitor Boot Tool CPU Configuration

Socket 942: AMD Eng Sample, ZD338251W8K54_39/33/22_2/8 8 Cores Running @3300 MHz 1375 mV Max Speed: 3300 MHz Intended Speed: 3300 MHz Not loaded Cache per Core L1 Instruction Cache: 64 KB/2-way L1 Data Cache: 16 KB/4-way   L2 Cache: 2048 KB/16-way Total L3 Cache per Socket: 8 MB/64-way


Memory Performance Gains On The Crosshair V Formula-Z & Sabertooth 990FX R2.0http://rog.asus.com/141502012/crosshair-v-motherboards/memory-performance-gains-on-the-crosshair-v-formula-z-sabertooth-990fx-r2-0/

Quote:
Below we have listed the typical performance using a 4-DIMM G.Skill kit of 16GB 2,400MHz DDR3 (with an initial QVL listed below). We’ll follow up with more Crosshair V Formula-Z and Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 news in the coming days, so keep an eye on ROG front page, AMD fans!

Crosshair V Formula-Z: 2,540MHz CL9
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
2540CL9.png


Sabertooth 990FX R2.0: 2,528MHz CL10
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
SABERTOOTH-990FX-R2.0-DDR3-2528.jpg


Initial 2,400MHz DDR3 QVL list
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
sabertooth-qvl.jpg



AMD Engineering Sample, ZD358246W6K54_41/35/20_2/8 (ES)

553394_17375994941585hqsq5.jpg
http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/553394_173759949415854_670476713_n.jpg

Piledriver
- FX-6300 3.5GHz base/4.1GHz turbo, 95W
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Bulldozer
- FX-6100 3.3GHz base/3.9GHz turbo, 95W
- FX-6200 3.8GHz base/4.1GHz turbo, 125W
Metric is offline  
post #3 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:47 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
G3RG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,878
Rep: 152 (Unique: 133)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric View Post

IPC is never static across the range of workloads, so those who used the Trinity results as a sign that 15% is a representation of average increases, should realize that was never going to be realistic. If the Cinebench R11.5 bench is correct, you're looking at an IPC increase shy of 10% (mid-high 9s) in CB.
Using an extremely crude estimate, based on the CB results, would see the FX-8 series look somewhat like this in CB Multithread.
FX 8300 score @ 3.3GHz = 5.73 —replaces— FX 8100 score @ 2.8GHz = 4.62
FX 8320 score @ 3.5GHz = 6.08 —replaces— FX 8120 score @ 3.1GHz = 5.04
FX 8350 score @ 4.0GHz = 6.95 —replaces— FX 8150 score @ 3.6GHz = 6.01
Those numbers are not in any way exact (including the Zambezi scores) and should only be seen as very rough estimates. Other similarly crude Vishera estimates, see the FX-8350 somewhere in the range of 7.22 or so in CB Multithread.
While different configurations and testing methods can not be directly compared, here are some CB results from different sites.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/6
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1914/9/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/53054-intel-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-cpu-review-11.html Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
44769lgs7e.png
cinebench-x33sl5.jpg
ivybridge_3770k_696tswg.jpg

If your math is accurate... This puts PD about on par with SB. Nice job AMD.

Quote:
csm: how do you enjoy being 22 and being less smarter than a 13 year old?
BWG: My sentence was proper grammar.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackVenom go_quote.gif

LOL! One doesn't buy an apple product with money in mind! It's about being one of the few elite with a laptop that takes a not-like-everyone-else approach by being just like everyone else - a prized possession that makes one feel as though they were capable of anything even though they're operating out of the Guantanamo of operating systems. It's a simple elegance that you, good sir, do not understand; you are of the PC serfs that still cling to having "options" and "freedom".


G3RG is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:50 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,904
Rep: 249 (Unique: 218)
Alatar is offline  
post #5 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:55 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 12,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by G3RG View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric View Post

IPC is never static across the range of workloads, so those who used the Trinity results as a sign that 15% is a representation of average increases, should realize that was never going to be realistic. If the Cinebench R11.5 bench is correct, you're looking at an IPC increase shy of 10% (mid-high 9s) in CB.
Using an extremely crude estimate, based on the CB results, would see the FX-8 series look somewhat like this in CB Multithread.
FX 8300 score @ 3.3GHz = 5.73 —replaces— FX 8100 score @ 2.8GHz = 4.62
FX 8320 score @ 3.5GHz = 6.08 —replaces— FX 8120 score @ 3.1GHz = 5.04
FX 8350 score @ 4.0GHz = 6.95 —replaces— FX 8150 score @ 3.6GHz = 6.01
Those numbers are not in any way exact (including the Zambezi scores) and should only be seen as very rough estimates. Other similarly crude Vishera estimates, see the FX-8350 somewhere in the range of 7.22 or so in CB Multithread.
While different configurations and testing methods can not be directly compared, here are some CB results from different sites.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/6
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1914/9/
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/53054-intel-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-cpu-review-11.html Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
44769lgs7e.png
cinebench-x33sl5.jpg
ivybridge_3770k_696tswg.jpg

If your math is accurate... This puts PD about on par with SB. Nice job AMD.

In this benchmark only right? BD will need more than a 10% gain overall to catch up with SB I would think, it's worse than the Bloomfield i7s in many cases.


lordikon is offline  
post #6 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:57 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
<({D34TH})>'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,221
Rep: 46 (Unique: 44)
And that's just an engineering sample! biggrin.gif

I'm looking forward on how does the 6-core Piledriver performs.

<({D34TH})> is offline  
post #7 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:57 PM
Retired Staff
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,591
Rep: 79 (Unique: 71)
This looks like a decent performance gain over BD! Cannot wait to play with one of these!

Sys #2,: A10-7700K @ 4.6Ghz, ASRock FM2A88X Extreme6+( FM2+) ,4gb GSkill Ripjaws @2133Mhz, Corsair 300R, Samsung P2770 HD-1080p, R7 250, Crucial C300 64GB Boot + Samsung F3 500Gb, NOCTUA NH-D14, Antec 620C Neo


Electroneng is offline  
post #8 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:57 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
JunkoXan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,486
Rep: 113 (Unique: 99)
Quote:
Originally Posted by G3RG View Post

If your math is accurate... This puts PD about on par with SB. Nice job AMD.

if does put it on par with SB then that'll save me alot and i mean alot of money biggrin.gif

JunkoXan is offline  
post #9 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 03:57 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
fivestring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 63
Rep: 3 (Unique: 2)
I'm proud of AMD. They may still be behind but price will be the deciding factor here. Plus OCing gthese thing will be awesome!

I'm tired of this 960T anyways lol



fivestring is offline  
post #10 of 636 (permalink) Old 08-06-2012, 04:01 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
funfortehfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tower of Heaven
Posts: 2,122
Rep: 109 (Unique: 94)
Welcome back AMD.

flickr | Camera Hardware: Nikon D90 + AF-S DX Nikkor 12-24 f/4G + AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G + AF-S micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G + Yongnuo YN-560 III + Crumpler 7MDH wheee.gif
Hilarious Quotes (Click to show)
Quote:
Question - the dollar sign goes before U.S. monetary amounts. If I am speaking in terms of Canadian dollars, do I put CAD before or after the amount?
you put it on top like a hat, i.e. canada aka USA's hat
CAD
3.50


funfortehfun is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off