[reddit] MS Surface Book SSDs use Samsung TLC (terrible write performance) - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[reddit] MS Surface Book SSDs use Samsung TLC (terrible write performance)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-01-2015, 09:34 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
ikjadoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 633
Rep: 26 (Unique: 25)
BREAKING

I just heard back from Brett Howse from Anandtech. Their Surface Book review will be up later this week. He said they noticed the same issue; they got two Surface Books: one SB with the 512GB XG3 and one SB with the 512GB PM951. The PM951 model has far slower writes. He is currently investigating further--possible dual-sourcing going on. Much love to Anandtech for taking this issue seriously.

My fantasy may be true. Now...just to figure out how to snag the Toshiba XG3 versions and not these Samsung spinning disks masquerading as 2015 NVMe PCIe SSDs.

To all you Microsoft defenders, please, take all the PM951 models. You, apparently, won't notice a difference. tongue.giftongue.giftongue.gif

--

It wasn't a conspiracy theory. Anandtech has vindicated me (specifically Brett Howse). I am saved.


original post


Unlike the 2015 Lenovo's X1 Carbon laptop, the Microsoft Surface Book does NOT use the speedy 2GB/s Samsung MLC-based SM951 drives, but seemingly versions of the anemic Samsung TLC-based PM951 drives. See the unusually slow write speed in NotebookCheck's review. The PM951 uses TLC, according to Anandtech.



reddit source

Like, seriously anemic:

128GB PM951 ($1500 Surface Book)
Sequential read: 600MB/s
Sequential write: 150MB/s
Random read: 140K
Random write: 37K

256GB PM951 ($1700, $1900, and $2100 Surface Book):
Sequential read: 1000MB/s
Sequential write: 280MB/s
Random read: 250K
Random write: 74K

512GB PM951 ($2700 Surface Book):
Sequential read: 1050MB/s
Sequential write: 560MB/s
Random read: 250K
Random write: 144K

Sure, sequential speed isn't that important, but if you copy files...wow. You just got transported back five years in terms of performance...from a $1500 laptop.

Just upgraded from a Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.5GHz to a Core i5-4670K @ 4.5GHz
ikjadoon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-01-2015, 09:46 PM
Null
 
geoxile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,314
Rep: 159 (Unique: 129)
It looks kinda disappointing in general. No Nvidia Optimus support for the dGPU and the tablet only carries an 18Whr battery. Less than half the SP4, which is already reduced from like 42Whr compared to older SPs. IMO might've been a better idea to make a properly dock for the SP4.

geoxile is offline  
post #3 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-01-2015, 09:50 PM
ٴٴٴ╲⎝⧹˙͜>˙⧸⎠╱
 
TK421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,371
Rep: 158 (Unique: 123)
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoxile View Post

It looks kinda disappointing in general. No Nvidia Optimus support for the dGPU and the tablet only carries an 18Whr battery. Less than half the SP4, which is already reduced from like 42Whr compared to older SPs. IMO might've been a better idea to make a properly dock for the SP4.

oi, without a muxer, optimus is a terrible idea for video performance

all the idiot manufacturers just port all of the gpu output video to the iGPU then use that to render everything to the screen (not the 3d models) with no option of disabling the useless iGPU

the smarter ones, only put the muxer in high end laptops such as M17x, GT60/70 etc. you can properly switch to fully dGPU mode and completely bypass the HD3000

nͫٴiͤٴcͫٴeͤ੮Һ૯ ცɿ૭ ૭คעٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴ ٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴ ٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴ ٴٴ
█▀█ █▄█ ▀█▀ ▀█▀
Desktop for gaming
(17 items)
ThinkPad T480
(9 items)
ThinkPad T430 XM
(9 items)
CPU
i7 5820K
Motherboard
X99 Deluxe
GPU
RTX 2080 Ti XC Ultra
RAM
Crucial 4x4GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 950 Pro 512GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Hard Drive
WD Black 4TB
Hard Drive
WD Red 10TB
Optical Drive
Dell CH03N BD
Power Supply
EVGA 750 G2
Cooling
Swiftech Drive H360X3
Case
Phanteks Enthoo Luxe
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
BenQ XL2430T
Monitor
ASUS PG279Q
Keyboard
Bloody B850
Mouse
Logitech G102 Prodigy (Mercury)
CPU
i7 8550U
Motherboard
Lenovo Windu-2 20L5
GPU
Intel UHD 620
RAM
F4-3000C16D-16GRS | 2x8GB 2400MHz
Hard Drive
Intel NVME SSD 256GB
Power Supply
Lenovo 65w USB-C
Cooling
Delta 01YR200
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
LP140WF6-SPB7 FHD IPS
CPU
i7 3920XM
Motherboard
Nozomi 4 Type 2344 BZU
GPU
Intel HD4000
RAM
F3-2133C11-8GSRL | 2x8GB 2133MHz
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB
Power Supply
Lenovo 90W
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 1809
Monitor
AUO B140HAN01.3
Keyboard
Classic 7-row NMB 45N2211
▲ hide details ▲


TK421 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 12:11 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
ikjadoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 633
Rep: 26 (Unique: 25)
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoxile View Post

It looks kinda disappointing in general. No Nvidia Optimus support for the dGPU .....

Err, it does have NVIDIA Optimus (but that's besides the point of terrible SSDs):
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anandtech (click button for link) View Post

Microsoft does have Optimus enabled, with the default setting in the custom control panel for Auto-Select on the GPU, but you can also change to integrated or the NVIDIA graphics. There is no GeForce Experience installed, so in order to make the change you have to dive into the Control Panel. It’s not very elegant but I think the idea is that you just leave it in auto and let the whitelist handle when the dGPU is enabled. My experience so far is that the whitelist seems a bit bugged right now, and the dGPU runs all the time when the Clipboard is docked, which is clearly not the way it is intended to be.

It's just broken, tongue.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK421 View Post

oi, without a muxer, optimus is a terrible idea for video performance

all the idiot manufacturers just port all of the gpu output video to the iGPU then use that to render everything to the screen (not the 3d models) with no option of disabling the useless iGPU

the smarter ones, only put the muxer in high end laptops such as M17x, GT60/70 etc. you can properly switch to fully dGPU mode and completely bypass the HD3000

So, kind of unrelated to terribad SSDs, but you realize that hardware mutliplexers have to turn the screen off and on every time they switch GPUs? That just sounds annoying. On a battery-conscious device, you want to minimize time on the dGPU. That requires lots of switching. And that's a lot of flickering...

Just upgraded from a Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.5GHz to a Core i5-4670K @ 4.5GHz
ikjadoon is offline  
post #5 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 12:42 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Kand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,132
Rep: 291 (Unique: 238)
it also uses nTrig so the pen is no good.

Kand is offline  
post #6 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 01:13 AM
Linux Lobbyist
 
AndroidVageta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,782
Rep: 97 (Unique: 79)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kand View Post

it also uses nTrig so the pen is no good.

I think the Surface Pro 3 used nTrig as well, no? I know it wasn't using Wacom like the first and second.

AndroidVageta is offline  
post #7 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 02:21 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
DiNet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Israel
Posts: 3,088
Rep: 145 (Unique: 125)
wow
that looks stunningly bad
DiNet is offline  
post #8 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 02:25 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Cyro999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10,755
Rep: 537 (Unique: 329)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndroidVageta View Post

I think the Surface Pro 3 used nTrig as well, no? I know it wasn't using Wacom like the first and second.

Why did they drop Wacom? frown.gif

I don't believe in "good enough"~!!

240hz / gsync / low persistence is AWESOME

post-flame-small.gif5 GHz Overclock Club post-flame-small.gif
Cyro999 is offline  
post #9 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 03:12 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
prjindigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,707
Rep: 152 (Unique: 89)
As to the original subject of the thread;

I have no problem at all with the drive in it NOT being able to write nearly twice the CPU's IO speed. That would be a useless component to have. Instead MS has gone for a reliable and low-speed component that probably uses less power and DEFINITELY generates less heat.


It's a no-brainer why they went with the Samsung.
prjindigo is offline  
post #10 of 53 (permalink) Old 11-02-2015, 03:17 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Serephucus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 361
Rep: 12 (Unique: 12)
Agreed. People here seem to just get used to high numbers with this, and jump on the low performance bandwagon without actually stopping to think about other reasons besides raw performance.

Serephucus is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off