[TECHSPOT] Do we need to re-review the Core i9-9900K? - Page 8 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[TECHSPOT] Do we need to re-review the Core i9-9900K?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #71 of 77 (permalink) Old 11-12-2018, 06:02 AM
I don't think so
DevilDinosaur
 
DevilDinosaur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 27
DevilDinosaur is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #72 of 77 (permalink) Old 11-12-2018, 08:06 AM
just some dude
sdch Level 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 94
Quote: Originally Posted by DevilDinosaur View Post
Perfect example of what I'm talking about.
sdch is offline  
post #73 of 77 (permalink) Old 11-13-2018, 07:03 AM
Overclocker
JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about JackCY has a spectacular aura about
 
JackCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 8,557
Lets face it even 4 core older CPUs with unlimited power and current by default on motherboards (same as the dreaded Z390) will drop CPU to base clocks as in 3.6GHz etc. when loaded fully on all cores with a heavy load, it won't keep turbo clocks on all cores it will drop all the way to base, the thing is most reviews don't load the CPU fully as only some applications are able to do that and it's not exactly everyday use case to torture the CPU to max.

MCE and power limits have been a problem on Intel motherboards default settings for years many years, mobo makers do what ever they want to look better in mobo comparison reviews trying to differentiate themselves in any way, MCE, power limit, BCLK cheating. With 4 cores no one gave a damn much but now with 8 cores the real power consumption and heat is twice that of specified Suddenly people start flipping out when the issue is made painfully obvious to them even though it's very very old.
JackCY is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #74 of 77 (permalink) Old 11-29-2018, 02:22 PM
New to Overclock.net
Imouto is an unknown quantity at this point Imouto is an unknown quantity at this point Imouto is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,675
Imouto is offline  
post #75 of 77 (permalink) Old 11-29-2018, 02:31 PM
sudo apt install sl
WannaBeOCer is an unknown quantity at this point WannaBeOCer is an unknown quantity at this point
 
WannaBeOCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,802
Quote: Originally Posted by JackCY View Post
Lets face it even 4 core older CPUs with unlimited power and current by default on motherboards (same as the dreaded Z390) will drop CPU to base clocks as in 3.6GHz etc. when loaded fully on all cores with a heavy load, it won't keep turbo clocks on all cores it will drop all the way to base, the thing is most reviews don't load the CPU fully as only some applications are able to do that and it's not exactly everyday use case to torture the CPU to max.

MCE and power limits have been a problem on Intel motherboards default settings for years many years, mobo makers do what ever they want to look better in mobo comparison reviews trying to differentiate themselves in any way, MCE, power limit, BCLK cheating. With 4 cores no one gave a damn much but now with 8 cores the real power consumption and heat is twice that of specified Suddenly people start flipping out when the issue is made painfully obvious to them even though it's very very old.
A handful of us complained when Z77 first introduced MCE. Now more people are paying attention to it since like you pointed out it's obvious.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/6214/...about-free-mhz

Maximus
(18 items)
CPU
Core i7 6700K 4.8Ghz @ 1.4v
Motherboard
Maximus VIII Formula
GPU
Radeon RX VEGA 64 @ 1750/1105Mhz with 1175Mv
RAM
G-Skill 32GB 3200Mhz
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB Raid 0
Power Supply
EVGA SuperNova 1200w P2
Cooling
EK Supremacy Full Copper Clean
Cooling
EK-FC Radeon Vega
Cooling
XSPC D5 Photon v2
Cooling
Black Ice Gen 2 GTX360 x2
Case
Thermaltake Core X5 Tempered Glass Edition
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Acer XF270HUA
Keyboard
Cherry MX Board 6.0
Mouse
Logitech G600
Mouse
Alugraphics GamerArt
Audio
Definitive Technology Incline
Audio
SMSL M8A
▲ hide details ▲
WannaBeOCer is online now  
post #76 of 77 (permalink) Old 12-06-2018, 03:34 PM
⤷ αC
AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about AlphaC has a spectacular aura about
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 9,920
http://blog.livedoor.jp/wisteriear/a...073103933.html
Click image for larger version

Name:	f63b8571.png
Views:	26
Size:	15.2 KB
ID:	236566
Click image for larger version

Name:	1e6b30c6.png
Views:	17
Size:	8.6 KB
ID:	236568
Click image for larger version

Name:	772772e8.png
Views:	17
Size:	11.8 KB
ID:	236570
It's not acceptable for AVX to use only 95W

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is offline  
post #77 of 77 (permalink) Old 12-06-2018, 05:38 PM
jonnyblaze
strong island 1 is an unknown quantity at this point strong island 1 is an unknown quantity at this point
 
strong island 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,322
Quote: Originally Posted by LancerVI View Post
Please understand; I'm not saying you're wrong, I just thought it important to note the rest of what he said. Having said that, Intel surely knows what's going on. They bifurcated their TDP into two specifications and they can't have it both ways at the same time. One spec to make their cpus look more efficient. Another to make it the fastest cpu around. I maybe over simplifying it, but essentially, that is what they've done. I don't think you can lay ALL of the blame on mobo manufactures.
Its kind of nice to have a choice between the 2 as a consumer.

<div class="post-sig post-sig-limit shazam usersig-click"><div class="reparse-sig-lineheight"><div style="text-align:center;"><img alt="ph34r-smiley.gif" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/ph34r-smiley.gif"><a href="https://www.overclock.net/t/1411500/official-evga-classified-owners-club"><b><span style="font-size:12px;">EVGA CLASSIFIED &amp; K|NGP|N OWNER'S CLUB</span></b></a><span> </span><img alt="ph34r-smiley.gif" src="http://files.overclock.net/images/smilies/ph34r-smiley.gif"></div></div></div>
strong island 1 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off