[Tom's/CB] Intel Comet Lake Packs Up to 10 Cores - Page 3 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[Tom's/CB] Intel Comet Lake Packs Up to 10 Cores

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 07:59 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
DNMock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Dallas
Posts: 3,482
Rep: 171 (Unique: 125)
Quote: Originally Posted by mouacyk View Post
you're doing it wrong. HEDT owners go for the lanes, man
QFT

You can have your extra 300 mhz over my 7900X. Meanwhile I will be enjoying my 20+ extra PCIE lanes.

edit: to be honest, given that the 7900X will be 2 years old or so when this drops and still have the added pcie lanes to boot, I still think it was a reasonably good deal at twice the price on release. GPU's used to be the same way, wait 2 years and you can get comparable performance for half the price, but that seems to no longer be the case



Last edited by DNMock; 03-14-2019 at 08:04 AM.
DNMock is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 11:19 AM
sudo apt install sl
 
WannaBeOCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,537
Rep: 177 (Unique: 123)
Quote: Originally Posted by tpi2007 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
The 9900k is a 95w chip, some Ryzen boards allow the 2700x to go up to 130w with XFR2 when properly cooled.

Yes? And many Intel boards have the 9900K working outside of Intel's guidelines out of the box, exceeding the 95w TDP by a lot, hence what I said. Technically and unlike AMD (unless you use PBO, which clearly states is outside the warranty), that puts the CPUs working outside of the warranty, although I'm mostly sure at this point that by not enforcing those guidelines, Intel is ok with it because it paints the 9900K in a better light and will thus honour all such warranties.
PBO is different than XFR, XFR doesn't void the warranty and allows the processor to run at higher frequency with better cooling. Which reviews showed uses up to 130w with proper cooling.

Silent
(20 items)
CPU
Core i9 9900K... CoffeeTime! @ 4.2Ghz w/ 1v
Motherboard
Maximus VIII Formula
GPU
Radeon VII @ 1900Mhz/1250Mhz w/ 1v
RAM
TeamGroup Xtreem 16GB 3866Mhz CL15
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
Power Supply
EVGA SuperNova 1200w P2
Cooling
EK Supremacy Full Copper Clean
Cooling
XSPC D5 Photon v2
Cooling
Black Ice Gen 2 GTX360 x2
Cooling
EK-Vector Radeon VII - Copper + Plexi
Case
Thermaltake Core X5 Tempered Glass Edition
Operating System
Clear Linux
Monitor
Acer XF270HUA
Keyboard
Cherry MX Board 6.0
Mouse
Logitech G600
Mouse
Alugraphics GamerArt
Audio
Definitive Technology Incline
Audio
SMSL M8A
▲ hide details ▲
WannaBeOCer is offline  
post #23 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 11:20 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
mothergoose729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 5,709
Rep: 341 (Unique: 284)
Another 14nm refresh... ouch. If AMD and TSMC really have 7nm down, then for the first time ever AMD will have a substantial processing node lead over intel, and with a very competitive architecture.
mothergoose729 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #24 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 12:10 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,177
Rep: 904 (Unique: 590)
Quote: Originally Posted by 7850K View Post
they already did that back in 2017 though

2016
i7-6850K 3.6Ghz(3.8Ghz)
6 core hyperthreaded
$617
+ HEDT motherboard

2017
i7-8700K 3.7Ghz(4.7Ghz)
6 core hyperthreaded
$370
+ mainstream motherboard

i7-6800K and i7-5820K existed with 28 PCIE lanes


------


Also i9-9900k when limited to 95W TDP tanks to 3.6GHz after you reach 7 cores (https://www.anandtech.com/show/13591...-power-for-sff).

Quote:
When a single core is loaded, the CPU is in 5.0 GHz mode as we are well under the power limit. There’s a slight decrease of 200 MHz in the 95W at two cores, but this disappears when 3-6 cores are loaded, with both setups being equal. The major difference happens however when we are at 7-8 cores loaded: because of the power consumption, the Core i9-9900K in 95W mode drops down to 3.6 GHz, which happens to be its base frequency.

This is about the same speed as Ryzen 7 2700 (65W) , see https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/...7_2700/16.html.




With no HT, the i7-9700k requires ~ 140W: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/..._9700K/18.html
Quote:
Throttling in this context means that the processor will not boost nearly as high. Instead of 4.7 GHz all-core (140 W), it was running at around 4.1 GHz when left at stock TDP.

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is offline  
post #25 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 12:36 PM
sudo apt install sl
 
WannaBeOCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,537
Rep: 177 (Unique: 123)
Quote: Originally Posted by mothergoose729 View Post
Another 14nm refresh... ouch. If AMD and TSMC really have 7nm down, then for the first time ever AMD will have a substantial processing node lead over intel, and with a very competitive architecture.
Just like their current Radeon VII, I don't believe we'll see anything special from Zen on 7nm compared to Intel's next 14nm refresh.

Intel's 14nm process is surprisingly efficient. I don't see an issue with Intel's next 14nm generation competing with AMD's Zen at 7nm. The IPC increase doesn't look spectacular. Cascade Lake is expected to receive an IPC increase which I'm sure will trickle down to these new generations.

Actual stock without MCE enabled:
6700k @ 4.0Ghz uses 110w
9900k @ 4.2Ghz uses 98w

Zen 2 @ NoClue Ghz uses 130w that matches
Core i7 9900k @ 4.7Ghz out of the box uses around 150-190w depending on the board.

Manual overclocks:
6700k @ 4.7Ghz uses 180w
9900k @ 4.7Ghz uses 130w
2700x @ 4.2Ghz uses 130w

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3...-duration-z390

Quote:
For reference, here’s what the frequency functionality looks like when operating under settings with MCE disabled via XMP II and the “No” prompt. This plot takes place over a 23-minute Blender render, so this is a real-world use case of the i9-9900K. Notice that there is a sharp fall-off after about 30 seconds, where average all-core frequency plummets from 4.7GHz to 4.2GHz. Notice that the power consumption remains at almost exactly 95W for the entire test, pegged to 94.9W and relatively flat. This corresponds to the right axis, with frequency on the left. This feels like an RTX flashback, where we’re completely power-limited. The difference is that this is under the specification, despite the CPU clearly being capable of more. You’ll see that the frequency picks up again when the workload ends, leaving us with unchallenged idle frequencies.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2_intel-tdp-investigation-frequency-chart_asus-max.png
Views:	23
Size:	41.0 KB
ID:	259190  


Silent
(20 items)
CPU
Core i9 9900K... CoffeeTime! @ 4.2Ghz w/ 1v
Motherboard
Maximus VIII Formula
GPU
Radeon VII @ 1900Mhz/1250Mhz w/ 1v
RAM
TeamGroup Xtreem 16GB 3866Mhz CL15
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
Power Supply
EVGA SuperNova 1200w P2
Cooling
EK Supremacy Full Copper Clean
Cooling
XSPC D5 Photon v2
Cooling
Black Ice Gen 2 GTX360 x2
Cooling
EK-Vector Radeon VII - Copper + Plexi
Case
Thermaltake Core X5 Tempered Glass Edition
Operating System
Clear Linux
Monitor
Acer XF270HUA
Keyboard
Cherry MX Board 6.0
Mouse
Logitech G600
Mouse
Alugraphics GamerArt
Audio
Definitive Technology Incline
Audio
SMSL M8A
▲ hide details ▲

Last edited by WannaBeOCer; 03-14-2019 at 12:44 PM.
WannaBeOCer is offline  
post #26 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-14-2019, 12:48 PM
Waiting for 7nm EUV
 
tpi2007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,381
Rep: 894 (Unique: 503)
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
PBO is different than XFR, XFR doesn't void the warranty and allows the processor to run at higher frequency with better cooling. Which reviews showed uses up to 130w with proper cooling.

Yes, exactly. XFR doesn't void the warranty, but what Intel motherboard makers are doing with the 9900K's out of the box settings technically does make the CPU run out of spec. As I said though, Intel probably doesn't care and will honour the warranties, otherwise they would have enforced the guidelines at this point.


tpi2007 is offline  
post #27 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-15-2019, 09:32 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
mothergoose729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 5,709
Rep: 341 (Unique: 284)
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
Just like their current Radeon VII, I don't believe we'll see anything special from Zen on 7nm compared to Intel's next 14nm refresh.

Intel's 14nm process is surprisingly efficient. I don't see an issue with Intel's next 14nm generation competing with AMD's Zen at 7nm. The IPC increase doesn't look spectacular. Cascade Lake is expected to receive an IPC increase which I'm sure will trickle down to these new generations.

Actual stock without MCE enabled:
6700k @ 4.0Ghz uses 110w
9900k @ 4.2Ghz uses 98w

Zen 2 @ NoClue Ghz uses 130w that matches
Core i7 9900k @ 4.7Ghz out of the box uses around 150-190w depending on the board.

Manual overclocks:
6700k @ 4.7Ghz uses 180w
9900k @ 4.7Ghz uses 130w
2700x @ 4.2Ghz uses 130w

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3...-duration-z390
I am also skeptical of TSMC 7nm, although I do not think Radeon VII is the best judge of potential. AMD clearly phoned that one in, at least when it comes to gaming performance.

Ryzen 2 is competitive enough with coffee lake that even a modest 20%-30% increase in die area or efficiency would put them over the top in a number of important metrics. I don't think it will be like athlon 64 days. IPC will likely be similar with a slight lead for intel, but AMD is going to be significantly ahead when it comes to power efficiency and parallelism for servers; at least until intel can finally produce a mature node (whether that is 10nm or a 7nm of their own).
mothergoose729 is offline  
post #28 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-15-2019, 11:28 AM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,177
Rep: 904 (Unique: 590)
Let's say it's the same increase as Vega 64 to Radeon VII , you'd still end up with a ~4.9GHz R7 2700X successor with ~ 4.6GHz all core clocks

Radeon VII = 1800MHz
Vega 64 = 1550MHz ; 13.4 TFLOPs vs 12.5 TFLOPs


For same power +16% clockspeed , which is less than the 7nm projection of +25% performance for same power and half the power for same performance

In practice the Radeon VII is around 20-30% faster than Vega 64.

Also take into account that there's $130 boards that can support this new CPU (i.e. B450 Pro Carbon , B450-E STRIX) that aren't utterly stripped down in feature-set and if you're staying under 130W just about any B450 board would suffice. If you want a board that can properly support a i9-9900K you'll need a Z390 board (the typical ones are Gigabyte Aorus Pro, Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 / Extreme 4 if you can deal with lack of debug features, Asus z390-A , MSI Z390 Edge).

MSI and ASUS already rolled out the new AGESA which is rumored to be for Ryzen 3000 series. That means a May/July launch is highly likely.


Quote: Originally Posted by https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/support/B450-GAMING-PRO-CARBON-AC
7B85v16
Release Date 2019-03-06
Description - Support new upcoming AMD cpu.
Quote: Originally Posted by https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/ROG-STRIX-X470-F-GAMING/HelpDesk_BIOS/
ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING BIOS 4406
Update AGESA 0070 for the upcoming processors and improve some CPU compatibility.

Quote: Originally Posted by https://www.asus.com/us/supportonly/ROG%20STRIX%20B450-E%20GAMING/HelpDesk_BIOS/
ROG STRIX B450-E GAMING BIOS 2008
Update AGESA 0070 for the upcoming processors and improve CPU compatibility.
ASUS strongly recommends installing AMD chipset driver 18.50.16 or later before updating BIOS.

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list



Last edited by AlphaC; 03-16-2019 at 10:14 PM.
AlphaC is offline  
post #29 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-16-2019, 09:04 PM
Spaghetti
 
Buris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,026
Rep: 42 (Unique: 34)
Quote: Originally Posted by AlphaC View Post
Let's say it's the same increase as Vega 64 to Radeon VII , you'd still end up with a ~4.9GHz R7 2700X successor with ~ 4.6GHz all core clocks

Radeon VII = 1800MHz
Vega 64 = 1550MHz ; 13.4 TFLOPs


For same power +16% clockspeed , which is less than the 7nm projection of +25% performance for same power and half the power for same performance

In practice the Radeon VII is around 20-30% faster than Vega 64.

Also take into account that there's $130 boards that can support this new CPU (i.e. B450 Pro Carbon , B450-E STRIX) that aren't utterly stripped down in feature-set and if you're staying under 130W just about any B450 board would suffice. If you want a board that can properly support a i9-9900K you'll need a Z390 board (the typical ones are Gigabyte Aorus Pro, Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6 / Extreme 4 if you can deal with lack of debug features, Asus z390-A , MSI Z390 Edge).

MSI and ASUS already rolled out the new AGESA which is rumored to be for Ryzen 3000 series. That means a May/July launch is highly likely.
I can agree. It would be extremely foolish to underestimate AMD on the CPU side right now. Yes, Radeon VII is a let down, but it's using the same underlying architecture as Vega.

Ryzen's underlying architecture is powerful and efficient. I think worst case scenario is that Ryzen 3000 will simply match the IPC and Clockspeeds of the 9900K.

Comet Lake will likely be an all-out 14nm defense for team blue until they can get their 10nm settled.

It's entirely possible we'll clockspeeds in the mid 4's to low 5's on low-end parts. If intel can't find a way to get Sunny Cove out by this year, expect next gen. intel to look like the following:

i3: 4c/8t
i5: 6/12t
i7: 8c/16t
i9: 10c/20t

Very likely these desktop parts will run extremely hot.

MARS
(18 items)
CPU
Ryzen 9 3900x
Motherboard
Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
GPU
EVGA 1080 Ti FTW3
RAM
G-Skill Sniper
Hard Drive
WD EMAZ001
Hard Drive
WD Black SN750
Power Supply
EVGA G3
Cooling
Noctua U12A
Case
NZXT H500
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10
Operating System
Pop! OS
Monitor
BenQ XL2730z
Keyboard
Aukey Mechanical
Mouse
Mionix Castor
Mousepad
Aukey
Audio
PreSonus Eris E3.5
Audio
SennHeiser 598
Audio
Blue Yeti
▲ hide details ▲
Buris is offline  
post #30 of 78 (permalink) Old 03-18-2019, 01:50 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
akromatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,649
Rep: 100 (Unique: 78)
Quote: Originally Posted by mouacyk View Post
you're doing it wrong. HEDT owners go for the lanes, man
what? not the channels?

well the lanes are meaningless if just running single GPU and 3 nvme drives.... especially when my mobo is only ITX. do like having the 10 core and 64Gb ram though but not when pleb sockets gets to enjoy the same amount of cores for far less dosh.

akromatic is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off