[ElChapuzasInformático][AMD] First AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (X470) Review (Spanish) - Page 6 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

[ElChapuzasInformático][AMD] First AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (X470) Review (Spanish)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #51 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 06:43 AM
sudo apt install sl
 
WannaBeOCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,354
Rep: 176 (Unique: 123)
Quote: Originally Posted by Redwoodz View Post
[IMG class=inlineimg]/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif[/IMG] You do realize this review shows a stock,6 core Ryzen 3 3600 MATCHING an 8 core I9-9900K in gaming on a non-overclocking bios with bad memory timings, and that is your conclusion? [IMG class=inlineimg]/forum/images/smilies/buttkick.gif[/IMG] [IMG class=inlineimg]/forum/images/smilies/lachen.gif[/IMG]
Am I missing something or are you ignoring the 6700k on those results?

Silent
(20 items)
CPU
Core i9 9900K... CoffeeTime! @ 4.2Ghz w/ 1v
Motherboard
Maximus VIII Formula
GPU
Radeon VII @ 1900Mhz/1250Mhz w/ 1v
RAM
TeamGroup Xtreem 16GB 3866Mhz CL15
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
Power Supply
EVGA SuperNova 1200w P2
Cooling
EK Supremacy Full Copper Clean
Cooling
XSPC D5 Photon v2
Cooling
Black Ice Gen 2 GTX360 x2
Cooling
EK-Vector Radeon VII - Copper + Plexi
Case
Thermaltake Core X5 Tempered Glass Edition
Operating System
Clear Linux
Monitor
Acer XF270HUA
Keyboard
Cherry MX Board 6.0
Mouse
Logitech G600
Mouse
Alugraphics GamerArt
Audio
Definitive Technology Incline
Audio
SMSL M8A
▲ hide details ▲
WannaBeOCer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #52 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 06:44 AM
News Fiend
 
ryan92084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: 'merica
Posts: 2,033
Elchap's ryzen 2nd gen review early wasn't too hot iirc several of the scores were lower than more reputable sites. Probably from non release drivers etc and this one has leaked even earlier than last time.

Meh '12
(13 items)
CPU
Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard
ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
GPU
XFX Fury X
RAM
G.SKILL TridentZ Series 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3200 F4-3200C14D-16GTZSW
Hard Drive
SAMSUNG 970 PRO M.2 2280 512GB PCIe Gen3. X4, NVMe
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro-Series
Hard Drive
Seagate 4TB Enterprise NAS SATA (ST4000VN0001)
Hard Drive
WD Black 1TB Performance Desktop Hard Drive WD1003FZEX
Power Supply
SEASONIC PLATINUM-860 860W RT
Cooling
Black Ice Nemesis 360GTS Radiator x2
Cooling
Monsoon MMRS Reservoir + D5 pump + mountings
Cooling
XSPC Raystorm Neo Metal
Cooling
EKWB Fury X
Cooling
Monsoon Free Center 1/2ID 3/4OD fittings + Rotaries + plug + Temp probe
Cooling
BeQuiet SilentWings 3 High Speed PWM x 9
Case
Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
LG 27" IPS 27UK650
Keyboard
Massdrop CTRL
Mouse
Logitech g403
Mousepad
HAYATE KOU FX SOFT NINJA Black L
Audio
Blue Yeti Black
Audio
Massdrop x AKG K7XX
Other
LIAN LI O11D-1X ,Riser Cable and cover bracket for PC-O11D
CPU
i5 3570k
Motherboard
Z77x-UD5H
GPU
Zotac 670 GTX AMP!
RAM
G.Skill f3-2400c10D-16gtx
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB
Optical Drive
Some old thing
Power Supply
Seasonic platinum 860w
Cooling
Custom water
Case
Customized Thermaltake Armor
Operating System
Win 10 pro
Monitor
Dell U2413
Keyboard
Ducky Shine
Mouse
Logi G502
▲ hide details ▲


ryan92084 is offline  
post #53 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 07:34 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Asterox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 360
Rep: 20 (Unique: 18)
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
The Ryzen 5 3600 single core performance is 6.49% faster than Skylake in Cinebench R15 at the same clock speed.
Cinebench R15 is old software, so only "Cinebench R20 is version" that should be used for good comparison.

"Singlethread Cinebench R20"

Intel Skylake CPU 4.2ghz, 445

AMD Ryzen 3000 4.2ghz, 487


https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comment...t/r5_3600_r20/

https://www.computerbase.de/thema/pr...ead-ergebnisse

Asterox is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #54 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 08:36 AM
5.3 Ghz 8 Core When
 
aDyerSituation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,292
Rep: 93 (Unique: 66)
Quote: Originally Posted by Redwoodz View Post
You do realize this review shows a stock,6 core Ryzen 3 3600 MATCHING an 8 core I9-9900K in gaming on a non-overclocking bios with bad memory timings, and that is your conclusion?
What benchmarks are you looking at?

Dang
(16 items)
CPU
i7 7820x @ 4.6ghz, 3.2ghz Mesh Delidded
Motherboard
X299 ASUS ROG Strix-E
GPU
MSI Quicksilver 1070 8GB
RAM
32gb 3800mhz 16-17-16-37-1T (Model F4-3600C16Q-32GTZKK)
Hard Drive
Intel 730 256gb SSD
Hard Drive
Intel 530 256gb SSD
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 2TB HDD
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDD
Power Supply
EVGA 750w G2
Cooling
Deepcool Captain 240EX White
Case
NZXT H440
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
AOC G2460PF 24” 144hz FreeSync
Mouse
Zowie EC1-A
Mouse
Huge
Other
Dr Pepper, Monster, and Vape
▲ hide details ▲
aDyerSituation is offline  
post #55 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 09:16 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
zGunBLADEz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,502
Rep: 99 (Unique: 72)
Quote: Originally Posted by aDyerSituation View Post
What benchmarks are you looking at?
idk but that 3600 is pretty close on those benchmarks against the 9900K which dont follow tdp to begin with and boost to 50x
mind you 42x $199 cpu is not even the x cpu

you going to show fps on 1080P and 720P show me as well gpu usage graphs as i want to see how far they are between both in that department..

dont see no point of seeing fps with 60-70% load on a gpu uncapped fps.. we need gpu load graphs on cpu bottlenecks

even a ram tweak match that

btw 42x on skylakeish cpu in cb15 is 180
amd have the ipc advantage big time this time..


Last edited by zGunBLADEz; 06-25-2019 at 09:22 AM.
zGunBLADEz is offline  
post #56 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 10:31 AM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,154
Rep: 904 (Unique: 590)
It's a good thing PC gaming isn't where the money is being made with Ryzen (they're using salvages from EPYC and probably keeping some for Threadripper). There's so many people that are simply too young to remember a time when AMD was on top (Athlon 64). Those same people tend to be the techtubers and such. I don't know how AMD can shake the "value brand" stigma after being close but not faster for so many years along with the epic failure of the Bulldozer line.

Anyone with an impartial view can see that Intel is in deep trouble because people that actually use their PCs for more than just gaming at 720p/1080p will benefit from higher efficiency , higher IPC, and automatic boosting to max clock on all cores even on stock cooler (Wraith Spire was used for R7 1700 as well). That is not even counting the Intel security patches that haven't been finalized. If you have a 65W part on stock cooler at out of the box clocks even close to the performance of an i7-9700K/i9-9900K how is that not a win for AMD? It's $200 versus a $400-500 part which requires more cooling, a Z390 motherboard that isn't garbage (~$100 MSI Tomahawk or ~$130 B450 Pro Carbon is likely to run the Ryzen 5s), and also z390 has zero upgrade path whereas any half decent AM4 board is going to be able to go up to 12 cores and 16 if you have x570.

Before Ryzen 3rd gen Intel still had an AVX2 advantage, with Ryzen 3rd gen the AVX2 performance is double wide. The only thing that remains for Intel is AVX-512 which is very rarely used.

If you recall Athlon64 was to Pentium 4 what this Ryzen 3rd gen chip generation will likely be to the 14nm+++ Intel chips. Athlon XP/MP was already competitive with Pentium 4 as it largely improved FPU, also was first CPU to 1GHz. Guess who led K8 (Athlon64)? Jim Keller. Who had a large hand in the Zen architecture? Jim Keller.

Even before that the K6-III led in frequency versus the Pentium III although pricing was not a strong suit. K6 is credited with bringing computing to the masses , clock for clock matching Pentium II except when FPU was used.

It wasn't until Intel Core that Intel really was ahead.

Anyhow consoles are bought by people that don't care about the brand of CPU. Zen 2 is also going into consoles. For the first time in a very long time AMD CPUs are also being used in mainstream laptops and even the iconic Thinkpad rather than low-end budget models. Every laptop / ultrabook / all-in-one worth buying that doesn't have strong Nvidia GPU or an 8th gen Intel CPU with 6+ cores is an AMD Ryzen product more or less.


It was definitely a smart business decision by Lisa Su and all others involved not to market to DIY. Breaking into the cloud space with Google Stadia (people don't care if they don't even own the GPU), breaking into the Apple ecosystem with radeon GPUs (guess what people don't care about the GPU if it's Apple products), breaking into mobile with Samsung partnerships, going for cloud compute with Amazon AWS + Baidu + Alibaba and Microsoft Azure as well is going to help AMD generate funds for R&D. Anything that needs x86 still isn't run on ARM yet without work done compiling , which isn't always feasible for closed source.

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is offline  
post #57 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 10:38 AM
5.3 Ghz 8 Core When
 
aDyerSituation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,292
Rep: 93 (Unique: 66)
I want to see what the 3800x can clock to. 4.7 all core should match a ~5ghz 9900k hypothetically

Dang
(16 items)
CPU
i7 7820x @ 4.6ghz, 3.2ghz Mesh Delidded
Motherboard
X299 ASUS ROG Strix-E
GPU
MSI Quicksilver 1070 8GB
RAM
32gb 3800mhz 16-17-16-37-1T (Model F4-3600C16Q-32GTZKK)
Hard Drive
Intel 730 256gb SSD
Hard Drive
Intel 530 256gb SSD
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 2TB HDD
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDD
Power Supply
EVGA 750w G2
Cooling
Deepcool Captain 240EX White
Case
NZXT H440
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
AOC G2460PF 24” 144hz FreeSync
Mouse
Zowie EC1-A
Mouse
Huge
Other
Dr Pepper, Monster, and Vape
▲ hide details ▲
aDyerSituation is offline  
post #58 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 01:56 PM
Madonion.com
 
Damage Inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 76
Rep: 1 (Unique: 1)
Quote: Originally Posted by AlphaC View Post
It's a good thing PC gaming isn't where the money is being made with Ryzen (they're using salvages from EPYC and probably keeping some for Threadripper). There's so many people that are simply too young to remember a time when AMD was on top (Athlon 64). Those same people tend to be the techtubers and such. I don't know how AMD can shake the "value brand" stigma after being close but not faster for so many years along with the epic failure of the Bulldozer line.

Anyone with an impartial view can see that Intel is in deep trouble because people that actually use their PCs for more than just gaming at 720p/1080p will benefit from higher efficiency , higher IPC, and automatic boosting to max clock on all cores even on stock cooler (Wraith Spire was used for R7 1700 as well). That is not even counting the Intel security patches that haven't been finalized. If you have a 65W part on stock cooler at out of the box clocks even close to the performance of an i7-9700K/i9-9900K how is that not a win for AMD? It's $200 versus a $400-500 part which requires more cooling, a Z390 motherboard that isn't garbage (~$100 MSI Tomahawk or ~$130 B450 Pro Carbon is likely to run the Ryzen 5s), and also z390 has zero upgrade path whereas any half decent AM4 board is going to be able to go up to 12 cores and 16 if you have x570.

Before Ryzen 3rd gen Intel still had an AVX2 advantage, with Ryzen 3rd gen the AVX2 performance is double wide. The only thing that remains for Intel is AVX-512 which is very rarely used.

If you recall Athlon64 was to Pentium 4 what this Ryzen 3rd gen chip generation will likely be to the 14nm+++ Intel chips. Athlon XP/MP was already competitive with Pentium 4 as it largely improved FPU, also was first CPU to 1GHz. Guess who led K8 (Athlon64)? Jim Keller. Who had a large hand in the Zen architecture? Jim Keller.

Even before that the K6-III led in frequency versus the Pentium III although pricing was not a strong suit. K6 is credited with bringing computing to the masses , clock for clock matching Pentium II except when FPU was used.

It wasn't until Intel Core that Intel really was ahead.

Anyhow consoles are bought by people that don't care about the brand of CPU. Zen 2 is also going into consoles. For the first time in a very long time AMD CPUs are also being used in mainstream laptops and even the iconic Thinkpad rather than low-end budget models. Every laptop / ultrabook / all-in-one worth buying that doesn't have strong Nvidia GPU or an 8th gen Intel CPU with 6+ cores is an AMD Ryzen product more or less.


It was definitely a smart business decision by Lisa Su and all others involved not to market to DIY. Breaking into the cloud space with Google Stadia (people don't care if they don't even own the GPU), breaking into the Apple ecosystem with radeon GPUs (guess what people don't care about the GPU if it's Apple products), breaking into mobile with Samsung partnerships, going for cloud compute with Amazon AWS + Baidu + Alibaba and Microsoft Azure as well is going to help AMD generate funds for R&D. Anything that needs x86 still isn't run on ARM yet without work done compiling , which isn't always feasible for closed source.
I leaked AMD64 numbers a month before its official release. Put a 3200+ on top of the ORB too. Back then, no o/ced P4 could touch an average 3200+ unless cooled with LN2. I sure hope you're right and I want AMD to beat Intel, but that vcore at 4.2Ghz worries me unless AMD use the worse silicon on the entry level chips.

Some people do remember. I'm the guy who leaked the 3200+ scores back in 2004 if I remember correctly, put one on top of the ORB twice after years of Intel's 3D dominance. I think me and JCViggen were the first people to post the FX-51 numbers too.
Damage Inc is offline  
post #59 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 04:15 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,154
Rep: 904 (Unique: 590)
https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/20...0-x570-review/

(x570 board)
The AIDA64 memory write is still busted it seems but the latency is now 75ns.

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is offline  
post #60 of 112 (permalink) Old 06-25-2019, 06:17 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
tyvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 114
Rep: 14 (Unique: 10)
[QUOTE=Pendulum;28016230]The 3700X/3800X aren't going to be much faster than the 3600 in single core/gaming is my point. I paid $288 for my 6700K 4 years ago, while it was initially slightly more expensive than the 3600 that was also 4 years ago and my CPU is considered ancient tech at this point.
While I want AMD to dethrone Intel to break up their monopoly it doesn't look like they're going to do so in gaming performance quite yet and hopefully AMD can gain the lead until Intel can produce 7nm.

Your CPU isn't considered ancient tech. The days of CPUs becoming obsolete rapidly are over, for good or ill, and will probably never come back. GPUs are probably hitting that point now.

With silicon chip design hitting hard physical limits in what can be done, we may be looking at much longer development times for improved processors.

Lots of efforts will now be spent in optimizing chip layouts (by hand even) and software, to give us those last bits of IPC increases without ballooning die sizes, while software cuts out the cruft to run more efficently. Thats the future of computing technology over the next decade or two.

Last edited by tyvar; 06-25-2019 at 06:21 PM.
tyvar is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off