AMD X 4 Battle Royale - time to get your Geek on! ( unofficial competition ) - Page 5 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

AMD X 4 Battle Royale - time to get your Geek on! ( unofficial competition )

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #41 of 47 (permalink) Old 03-30-2016, 03:02 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,383
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Quote:
Originally Posted by schubaltz View Post

Not the prettiest in terms of voltage, it's the best range i can do that's stable at least haven't got the time to tweak since it ain't my 24/7 setting

schubaltz 4ghz - single 2242 multi 7582 - Phenom II X4 960T @4ghz





Looking at your sig ts I never felt this humilated. The 960T I got is just filthy biggrin.gif. The best oc I can do is 3.8ghz on 5 cores at 1.49v.

Nice scores, but I'm going to have to bump you up to the 4.5 ghz bracket as you are running over 4ghz redface.gif
If you want to compete in the 4 ghz bracket , get the clock below 4ghz and I'll accept that score for the lower bracket smile.gif

Thanks for the sub:thumb:.
cssorkinman is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #42 of 47 (permalink) Old 03-30-2016, 03:06 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
drmrlordx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,315
Rep: 74 (Unique: 51)
Interesting how the 960T is reacting to Geekbench 3. Your scaling from single thread to multithread is 84.5%, while the SR scaling appears to be around 78%.

Watch this space for future . . . uh . . . stuff! Yeah. That.
drmrlordx is offline  
post #43 of 47 (permalink) Old 03-30-2016, 03:40 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,383
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Never took the time to do the math on this 965 run
http://hwbot.org/submission/3158356_
cssorkinman is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #44 of 47 (permalink) Old 03-31-2016, 02:47 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
drmrlordx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,315
Rep: 74 (Unique: 51)
That 965 is scaling at 90.2% efficiency.

Watch this space for future . . . uh . . . stuff! Yeah. That.
drmrlordx is offline  
post #45 of 47 (permalink) Old 03-31-2016, 02:55 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,383
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmrlordx View Post

That 965 is scaling at 90.2% efficiency.

Makes me wonder what is going on with the bench.
cssorkinman is offline  
post #46 of 47 (permalink) Old 04-01-2016, 08:42 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
drmrlordx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,315
Rep: 74 (Unique: 51)
Good question! It may have as much to do with the OS/scheduler as anything else. Or maybe I'm talking out of my arse. Geekbench is a bit weird in any case.

Watch this space for future . . . uh . . . stuff! Yeah. That.
drmrlordx is offline  
post #47 of 47 (permalink) Old 04-19-2016, 05:28 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
cssorkinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,383
Rep: 462 (Unique: 262)
Just for fun

cssorkinman is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off