Intel Broadwell-C Ownership Club - Page 374 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

Intel Broadwell-C Ownership Club

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #3731 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-17-2019, 11:31 AM
Are you sure about that?
 
TwilightRavens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: OBX, North Carolina
Posts: 930
Rep: 9 (Unique: 7)
I still don’t get how dense you have to be to not understand the read and write are done on the same clock cycle, like I have a “tardy” 5 y/o nephew that could understand that much, and the fact that since they are done in the same cycle its still miles ahead of DDR4, even in quad channel regardless of speed and latency. Like its not rocket science, I mean if he can’t realize that I don’t know how the dude even completes a catchpa, or puts his name on a document where it says “Name:_____”.

But In the same sense it would not make it better where more cores benefit in said workload, only in the sense where it’s cache sensitive and on rare occasions memory intensive. Like said above, don’t feed stray animals or trolls under the bridge or they might end up following you home. And before anyone claims this as “attacking someone” its not, i’m just stating the obvious, and it’s pretty obvious the guy doesn’t get it, nor wants to get it.

"In Yorkfield, crossing the Ivy Bridge to get over Coffee Lake, while Ryzen to the challenge with my Broadwell."
LGA 775 *Updated*
(14 items)
LGA 1150
(16 items)
CPU
Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX9650 4.10GHz (1.48v) 432 x 9.5
Motherboard
EVGA nForce 790i SLI Ultra (132-CK-NF79)
GPU
MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G
RAM
Patriot Signature DDR3 2 x 4GB (8GB) 1726MHz CL9
Hard Drive
Kingston A400 2.5" SATA III SSD 120GB
Hard Drive
Crucial MX400
Power Supply
Thermaltake White 80+
Cooling
Cooler Master MasterLiquid Lite ML240L RGB
Case
Fractal Design Focus G
Operating System
Windows 7 Ultimate Service Pack 1 (x64)
Keyboard
Logitech G213 Prodigy RGB
Mouse
Logitec M510 Wireless Mouse
Other
Noctua NF-F12 PWM
Other
Noctua NF-F12 PWM
CPU
Intel® Core™ i7-5775C 4.4GHz (1.4v)
Motherboard
ASUS Z97-E/USB 3.1 (LGA 1150)
GPU
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Superclocked 2.1GHz (boost) 1325MHz GDDR5X
RAM
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 4 x 8GB (32GB) 2400MHz 11-13-13-31-2T (1.675v)
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Evo SATA III SSD 120GB
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM HDD 2TB
Power Supply
Corsair RM850 850W 80+ Gold Efficiency
Cooling
Corsair H100i v2
Case
Corsair Carbide Clear 400C
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro x64
Monitor
42” HDTV (Temporary)
Keyboard
Logitech G213 Prodigy (RGB Illuminated)
Mouse
Logitech M510 Wireless Mouse
Other
Coollaboratory Liquid Ultra
Other
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Other
Xbox One Wireless Controller for Windows w/ Wireless USB dongle
CPU
Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard
GIGABYTE X470 AORUS Ultra Gaming AM4
GPU
EVGA GTX 1070 Superclocked (2050MHz boost)
RAM
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4 DRAM 3200MHz CL16 2 x 8GB (16GB)
Hard Drive
Crucial MX300 SSD
Hard Drive
HGST 1TB 2.5"
Optical Drive
ASUS CD/DVD Drive
Power Supply
Corsair CX650
Cooling
Wraith Spire AM4 Cooler
Case
DEEPCOOL ATX Case Kendomen TI
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro x64
Monitor
Samsung 24" 1080p curved
Keyboard
Standard Dell wired keyboard from the early 2000's
Mouse
Logitech Standard Wired Mouse
▲ hide details ▲

Last edited by TwilightRavens; 04-17-2019 at 11:41 AM.
TwilightRavens is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #3732 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 01:59 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
8051's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,669
Rep: 21 (Unique: 15)
Quote: Originally Posted by Groove2013 View Post
Guys, don't feed him. Be smarter than him.
He refuses to understand, that it's not purely about bandwidth, that by itself doesn't benefit much to games, then let him think this way.
Um, the latencies people are getting w/some DDR4 setups exceed your eDRAM and it's bandwidth simultaneously. The epeen castration complex here is palpable. Too bad the techreport article doesn't support your delusions of superiority. What kind of IDIOT would think 100 GiB/sec bandwidth doesn't make a difference over ~60 GiB/sec?
8051 is offline  
post #3733 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 02:01 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
8051's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,669
Rep: 21 (Unique: 15)
Quote: Originally Posted by TwilightRavens View Post
I still don’t get how dense you have to be to not understand the read and write are done on the same clock cycle, like I have a “tardy” 5 y/o nephew that could understand that much, and the fact that since they are done in the same cycle its still miles ahead of DDR4, even in quad channel regardless of speed and latency. Like its not rocket science, I mean if he can’t realize that I don’t know how the dude even completes a catchpa, or puts his name on a document where it says “Name:_____”.

But In the same sense it would not make it better where more cores benefit in said workload, only in the sense where it’s cache sensitive and on rare occasions memory intensive. Like said above, don’t feed stray animals or trolls under the bridge or they might end up following you home. And before anyone claims this as “attacking someone” its not, i’m just stating the obvious, and it’s pretty obvious the guy doesn’t get it, nor wants to get it.
Um, in a quad channel setup reading and writing can be done on separate channels simultaneously.

Furthermore, your L3 cache is captive to your L4 "cache" in the sense that the L4 cache tags are stored in the L3 cache.

Techreport debunked your epeen months ago.
8051 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #3734 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 05:39 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
kicurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 33
Rep: 2 (Unique: 2)
In games I play, the 5775c still has great performance plus I did not have to buy expensive ddr4. Next built is a Ryzen 2. why anyone would buy a furnace like the 9900k plus exspensive cooler and memory is beyond me. I play in vr only now so the real life low latency in games with the 5775c is great. As a matter of fact the lowly 5675c is still great in most games. I use it with 1080 TI for vr games that are less demanding in room scale.
kicurry is offline  
post #3735 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 09:06 AM
Water-cooler
 
NBrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Derpville USA
Posts: 1,539
Rep: 45 (Unique: 39)
Quote: Originally Posted by kicurry View Post
In games I play, the 5775c still has great performance plus I did not have to buy expensive ddr4. Next built is a Ryzen 2. why anyone would buy a furnace like the 9900k plus exspensive cooler and memory is beyond me. I play in vr only now so the real life low latency in games with the 5775c is great. As a matter of fact the lowly 5675c is still great in most games. I use it with 1080 TI for vr games that are less demanding in room scale.
The 5775c is still a great performer for sure. Mine has been retired to backup rig duty, but the reason wasn't lack of performance. Just wanted something new to play with.

The 9900k really doesn't run as hot as people complain about...sure if you leave your mobo to run whatever voltage it wants to do the "multi core enhancement" it will run warmer than it should. Most of the people complaining about the 9900k I see on reddit are trying to use cheap air coolers and not turning off the "multi core enhancement" stuff. While it doesn't need a custom water loop, people can't expect a 20 dollar cooler to keep an 8 core cool at 5GHz.


I hope when/if AMD brings some great competition we start seeing flagship CPUs from Intel with the L4 cache.



NBrock is offline  
post #3736 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 09:34 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
KraxKill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 534
Rep: 48 (Unique: 35)
Quote: Originally Posted by 8051 View Post
Um, in a quad channel setup reading and writing can be done on separate channels simultaneously.

Furthermore, your L3 cache is captive to your L4 "cache" in the sense that the L4 cache tags are stored in the L3 cache.

Techreport debunked your epeen months ago.
I am really sorry for you man. You lack an understanding of eDram or how it affects workloads. Not entirely sure what you are trying to prove either? That a 6yo chip is finally outpaced by DDR4 platforms? You are looking at AIDA which is affected by both bandwidth and clock. You are comparing a TechReport article which conveniently left the CPU at stock clock settings, stock eDram clocks and ran the crappiest RAM they could find?

Anybody with an impartial mind can look at that and say, WOW an old ass 5775C on stock settings with trash ram is keeping up with current systems.

Like I said, my friend runs a 9900K and gets one extra frame per second than me in ARMA3. We play together daily. If anybody is stretching their epeen it's you. The very fact you mention the term at all lol. You're on this board, don't own this CPU, don't have any experience with it and are here running garbage about the subject you don't understand. You don't understand what a "cache miss" is or how it is handled by either architecture.

Here is some education on the subject.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/9582/...ure-analysis/5

Your post to rep ratio, along with your post history should tell everyone about your intentions and lack of substance.

For everybody else that can see past the hype, actually cares to see how eDram improves IPC performance and can compare apples to apples. Here's a bench for you. 2 members of this board are in the top 10, on significantly lower core clocks than anything around. (Now don't go looking for oranges trying to compare 6 and 8 core CPUS to quad cores.) Rather, imagine an 8 core eDram equipped CPU and what it would do to a DDR4 system.

https://hwbot.org/benchmark/winrar/r...=0#interval=20

CLEARLY there is a huge advantage to eDram style caching compared to having to run through the mem controller out to the DDR for any CPU utilizing it. Sure DDR has got faster over the last few years. It took more than 6y to get on par. I'm not sure any 5775C owner is surprised by this or disappointed by their purchases. You on the other hand do seem particularly sour to keep coming back to this thread. If anything this has made my epeen grow for making such a smart purchase way back when.

If anything we all hope to see an 8core CPU with eDram style caching which would make for a monumental leap in performance over existing architecture worth upgrading to.

If your intention is to somehow say that eDRAM is irrelevant in improving IPC you're delusional as that is precisely where both AMD and Intel are headed in advancing IPC performance adding more and more caching closer to the core.

Now imagine you're this guy. You're mostly into gaming, bought a 5820K, spent a ton of money for an x99 board + DDR4 and later found out that your 6 core is outpaced by an older quad core out of an iMac, and can't compete with the 6700K, 7700K or the 8700K while a on old ass 5775C on an old ass x97 on DDR3 is running circles around you in all that is relevant. So he is here talking trash trying to make himself feel better. https://www.overclock.net/forum/5-in...l#post23601301
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2019-04-24 at 7.50.42 AM.png
Views:	12
Size:	177.8 KB
ID:	266474  


Last edited by KraxKill; 04-24-2019 at 11:02 AM.
KraxKill is offline  
post #3737 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-24-2019, 12:59 PM
Like a fox!
 
kithylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,056
Rep: 77 (Unique: 58)
Quote: Originally Posted by 8051 View Post
Um, the latencies people are getting w/some DDR4 setups exceed your eDRAM and it's bandwidth simultaneously. The epeen castration complex here is palpable. Too bad the techreport article doesn't support your delusions of superiority. What kind of IDIOT would think 100 GiB/sec bandwidth doesn't make a difference over ~60 GiB/sec?
Even in quad channel computer ram, all ram, even from the old SDRAM to modern DDR4 can only do either one write or one read per clock cycle. The amount of channels does not change this. This is a basic function of the technology of system RAM. I would suggest you read this article because you clearly do not even grasp the basics of computer technology: https://computer.howstuffworks.com/ram.htm

eDRAM inside a processor can do both a read and a write on each clock cycle. Computer System ram can not. There is a -BIG- difference.

Last edited by kithylin; 04-25-2019 at 04:33 AM.
kithylin is offline  
post #3738 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-25-2019, 12:06 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Groove2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 198
Rep: 8 (Unique: 8)
Lol, seen an Intel roadmap and 14 nano until the end of 2021 )))

Q2 2020 10 cores Comet Lake and Q2 2021 10 cores (refresh) Rocket Lake.

Now I'm sure I will buy the i7-5775C, for ArmA only, for 3 more years on same platform.
I will get almost 10 FPS more, which will be fine (for ArmA) till 2022.
Sure, 350$ from AliExpress + shipping is a lot, but much less than buying a very expensive CPU (i9-9900K 5.2 GHz) + very expensive RAM (32 GB 4000 MHz CL17) + expensive mobo + custom watercooling.
For less than 10 FPS, average, singleplayer.

i7-4790K 4.8/4.4 GHz core/cache (non AVX) @ Conductonaut | NH-D15S @ Conductonaut | Maximus VII Hero (Z97)
Trident X 32 GB (4x8) 2400 MHz 10-11-12-18-204-1 (F3-2400C10Q-32GTX) (Samsung ICs)
Strix 1070 Ti Advanced Binned 2050/9600 MHz CUDA/vRAM
AX860i (71,6 A 12 V single rail 80+ Platinum)
Groove2013 is offline  
post #3739 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-25-2019, 12:45 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 10
Rep: 0
Anyone overclocked their iGPU?
Tried it out of curiosity, but my results are a bit weird. Performance scaling is pretty good.
8.2k with 3dmark Night Raid at 1150
8.8k at 1250
But with anything over 1250 is gets back 8.2k. For some reason frequency drops back to 1150 with anything higher than 1250 (While benchmarking. After the boot GPU-Z reports it as it should be).
Anyone knows a reason for this weird frequency drop?
Northfear is offline  
post #3740 of 3766 (permalink) Old 04-25-2019, 01:16 AM
The last VRM burner
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,185
Rep: 9 (Unique: 7)
I did. I can't remember what clocks were at all, but it gave me 25-30FPS in desert area in NieR Automata on 720p, everything but shadows and effects on high. Started with 18-22 . I think it was 1250ish too on 1.3V on iGPU, going for higher clocks provided visual glitches. But the clocks were stable.

PC for all
(18 items)
CPU
i7 5775c @4.2GHz/3.8GHz
Motherboard
Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 5
GPU
Sapphire Radeon RX580 8GB Nitro+
RAM
2x KHX2400C11D3/8GX 11-12-12-32-1T-250
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 Pro
Hard Drive
Toshiba HDWD10 (P300)
Power Supply
Corsair CS650M
Cooling
Raijintek Tisis + Arctic Cooling MX4
Case
LianLi 330X
Operating System
Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Monitor
Benq GL2250 80Hz
Keyboard
Corsair Strafe Red
Mouse
SteelSeries Rival 310
Mousepad
SteelSeries QCk Mini
Audio
Audio in Motion SC808
Audio
AKG K240 Studio 1st rev
Other
NZXT Hue+
Other
Mayflash F300
▲ hide details ▲
BroadPwns is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off