9900KS lottery thread - Page 41 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community
Forum Jump: 

9900KS lottery thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #401 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-14-2020, 07:48 PM
no regurts
 
Kalm_Traveler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 495
Rep: 3 (Unique: 2)
Quote: Originally Posted by munternet View Post
Ambient will have a large effect on temps at idle so they will be different for different regions etc.
Unless idle temps are ridiculous I would only be concerned with loaded temps
aye, was just odd to me that the idle temp literally stayed exactly the same after delidding and going direct die. 34-35 C in 21.4 ambient. Meanwhile the 7960x delidded + LM rig I'm crash-testing next to it has cores mostly around 25-28 C with light use.

HEDT Overkill
(13 items)
CPU
Core i9 7960x
Motherboard
Asus Rampage VI Extreme
GPU
Titan RTX
GPU
Titan RTX
RAM
G.Skill Trident-Z RGB
Hard Drive
Samsung 960 Pro
Hard Drive
Samsung 850 EVO
Power Supply
Corsair AX1600i
Case
Thermaltake Tower 900 - black
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
LG 38GL950-G
Keyboard
Massdrop CTRL
Mouse
Speedlink Decus Respec
CPU
9900ks
Motherboard
Maximus XI Extreme
GPU
2080 Ti Kingpin
RAM
GSkill Trident Z RGB
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 Evo Plus
Power Supply
Corsair HX1200
Case
Cooler Master COSMOS C700M
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Asus PG348Q
Keyboard
Corsair K70 LUX RGB
Mouse
Corsair Ironclaw RGB
Audio
Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1
CPU
Core i7 9750H
GPU
RTX 2080 Max-Q
Hard Drive
Samsung 960 Pro
Keyboard
Razer Blackwidow TE Chroma V2
Mouse
Razer Mamba Wireless 2018
▲ hide details ▲
Kalm_Traveler is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #402 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 01:26 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Rep: 0
I think I've got my i9900ks where I want it now. I'm going to get a waterblock for my 2070 FE super to add to my custom loop. AVX offset at 0, LLC at level 7.
Any observations and/ or suggestions gratefully received.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	desktop.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	319156  

Col Frost is offline  
post #403 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 01:51 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
munternet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 369
Rep: 13 (Unique: 7)
Quote: Originally Posted by Col Frost View Post
I think I've got my i9900ks where I want it now. I'm going to get a waterblock for my 2070 FE super to add to my custom loop. AVX offset at 0, LLC at level 7.
Any observations and/ or suggestions gratefully received.
That's pretty decent if it's stable
LLC7 is higher than recommended. 5 or maybe 6 seems more stable although the vcore with the cpu relaxed is higher but there are less transients/fluctuations as load comes on or off. Voltage under load can be a bit lower.

Intel Memory Overclocking Quick Reference https://www.overclock.net/forum/27784556-post7836.html
CPU
9900ks
Motherboard
Asus Maximus XI Gene
GPU
EVGA 1080 Ti Superclock 2 Black
RAM
F4-4400C19D-16GTZSW
Hard Drive
Samsung M.2 1TB 970 EVO Plus
Hard Drive
Samsung M.2 1TB 970 EVO
Power Supply
Corsair HX1200i
Cooling
EK 140D5 Pump, waterblocked CPU, Ram, GPU with 1 x 360mm and 1 x 420mm Radiators and Vardar Furious Fans
Case
ThermalTake V51
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Asus PG349Q 34.1 inches 3440 x 1440 pixels @ 120 Hz
Keyboard
Corsair K95 RGB Platinum
Mouse
Asus Spatha Wireless Gaming
Mouse
Ligitech G602 wireless
Mousepad
1000x500x3
Audio
Steelseries Siberia800 wireless Headset
CPU
8700k @ 5.2ghZ
Motherboard
Maximus X Hero
GPU
EVGA 1080 Ti Superclock 2 Black
RAM
32GB 1xF4-4400C19D-16GTZSW & 1xF4-4400C19D-16GTZKK
Hard Drive
Samsung M.2 1TB 970 EVO Plus
Hard Drive
Samsung M.2 1TB 970 EVO
Power Supply
Corsair HX1200i
Cooling
EK 140D5 Pump, waterblocked CPU, Ram, GPU with 1 x 360mm and 1 x 420mm Radiators and Vardar Furious Fans
Case
ThermalTake V51
Operating System
Windows 10 Lite
Monitor
Asus PG349Q 34.1 inches 3440 x 1440 pixels @ 120 Hz
Keyboard
Corsair K95 RGB Platinum
Mouse
Asus Spatha Wireless Gaming
Mouse
Ligitech G602 wireless
Mousepad
1000mm x 500mm
Audio
Steelseries Siberia800 wireless Headset
CPU
i7-4770k
Motherboard
Asus Maximus VII Ranger
GPU
Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX980
RAM
G.SKILL Trident X 16GB 2 x 8GB 2400 Memory F3-2400C10D-16GTX
Hard Drive
Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Optical Drive
LG DVD Rom
Power Supply
PSU Coolermaster V1000W
Cooling
Custom Loop
Case
Case Thermaltake V51 Full Window
Operating System
Windows 7
Monitor
Shimian 2650x1440
Keyboard
Thermaltake Poseidon Z
Mouse
Logitech G602
▲ hide details ▲
munternet is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #404 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 02:04 PM
hazed is lazed
 
eminded1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
Posts: 226
Rep: 4 (Unique: 4)
Quote: Originally Posted by Col Frost View Post
I think I've got my i9900ks where I want it now. I'm going to get a waterblock for my 2070 FE super to add to my custom loop. AVX offset at 0, LLC at level 7.
Any observations and/ or suggestions gratefully received.
nice clock speed... what AVX Offset are you using at 5.3? what is your vcore and set at.. how are your temps in prime95 smallfft with AVX/ NON AVX Loads?? stable? Im at 5.1 NON AVX Stable, and 4.9 AVX Stable. But I can push to 5.2 AVX and NON AVX Stable but not with prime95 but with aida64/ Intel XTU, Realbench, passes those all day long with LLC at 6 and Vcore set at 1.4

Iv gotten it up to 5.5 in windows using DIPS, but wont pass any stress test and idles high and the transient loads jump to 70 right in the desktop plus the vcore is at max (1.52)
eminded1 is offline  
post #405 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 02:11 PM
hazed is lazed
 
eminded1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
Posts: 226
Rep: 4 (Unique: 4)
Quote: Originally Posted by Col Frost View Post
I think I've got my i9900ks where I want it now. I'm going to get a waterblock for my 2070 FE super to add to my custom loop. AVX offset at 0, LLC at level 7.
Any observations and/ or suggestions gratefully received.
nice oc, what is your AVX offset set at? What Vcore? did you try prime 95 small FFT what are temps..

Im prime95 stable at 5.1 NON AVX and 4.9 AVX Loads, vcore is set at 1.4 and llc of 6, Temps don't break 83c under any condition, but I did try 5.2 both with AVX and Without (0 Offset) and its stable under every stress test program like Realbench, Linx, Intel XTU, Aida64 at the same voltage as 5.1, except prime95.

I have pushed it to 5.5GHZ but not stable and max Vcore used at 1.52 and it was barley stable. kept crashing I attached a pic I took when I was at 5.5, but yea.. amazing how 5.2 with 0 AVX offset is stable with all those stress test programs except prime95... but im picky when it comes to stability I don't want to crash that why im staying at 5.1 with -2 AVX Offset for work purposes, but when gaming I may push up to 5.2 0 AVX using at 1.4 v core and its stable under gaming. 5.2 with AVX load is asking ALOT from the chip and temps go to 100C instantly and its 100% unstable if I even to try to run prime95
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	sssscsd.png
Views:	57
Size:	801.1 KB
ID:	319158  


haze is lazed
eminded1 is offline  
post #406 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 02:15 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Falkentyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riverside
Posts: 6,818
Rep: 418 (Unique: 293)
Quote: Originally Posted by eminded1 View Post
nice oc, what is your AVX offset set at? What Vcore? did you try prime 95 small FFT what are temps..

Im prime95 stable at 5.1 NON AVX and 4.9 AVX Loads, vcore is set at 1.4 and llc of 6, Temps don't break 83c under any condition, but I did try 5.2 both with AVX and Without (0 Offset) and its stable under every stress test program like Realbench, Linx, Intel XTU, Aida64 at the same voltage as 5.1, except prime95.

I have pushed it to 5.5GHZ but not stable and max Vcore used at 1.52 and it was barley stable. kept crashing I attached a pic I took when I was at 5.5, but yea.. amazing how 5.2 with 0 AVX offset is stable with all those stress test programs except prime95... but im picky when it comes to stability I don't want to crash that why im staying at 5.1 with -2 AVX Offset for work purposes, but when gaming I may push up to 5.2 0 AVX using at 1.4 v core and its stable under gaming. 5.2 with AVX load is asking ALOT from the chip and temps go to 100C instantly and its 100% unstable if I even to try to run prime95
You should be very careful with what you're doing.
That chip saw 1.687 going into it when you either started or stopped that prime95 test. You do NOT want to burn through the oxide gates and destroy that CPU. I'm hoping that's a misreported bug and not a transient spike it happened to log.

[email protected] ghz, RX Vega 64, 32GB DDR4, Gigabyte Aorus Master, Seasonic Platinum 1000W, Corsair 760T
Alt: MSI GT73VR Throttlebook with 7820HK @ 4.7 ghz, GTX 1070 MXM TDP mod to 230W, 32 GB RAM
Falkentyne is online now  
post #407 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 02:39 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Rep: 0
Quote: Originally Posted by eminded1 View Post
nice clock speed... what AVX Offset are you using at 5.3? what is your vcore and set at.. how are your temps in prime95 smallfft with AVX/ NON AVX Loads?? stable? Im at 5.1 NON AVX Stable, and 4.9 AVX Stable. But I can push to 5.2 AVX and NON AVX Stable but not with prime95 but with aida64/ Intel XTU, Realbench, passes those all day long with LLC at 6 and Vcore set at 1.4

Iv gotten it up to 5.5 in windows using DIPS, but wont pass any stress test and idles high and the transient loads jump to 70 right in the desktop plus the vcore is at max (1.52)
AVX offset is 0, vcore is 1.34v.
I'm not an experienced overclocker as such, haven't run prime95 yet, but have downloaded and am about to.
I have got to 5.5 too, but only on silly voltage, and 5.4 at 1.41v. I even managed 5.4 at 1.395v, but think maybe that voltage is a bit high, given my LLC level and the potential for the voltage to spike to an unacceptable high.
it's been interesting playing around with the settings, and took me a while to get the RAM seemingly stable at 3800MHz with 15-15-15-32 timings on 1.47v.
Col Frost is offline  
post #408 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-15-2020, 02:43 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 32
Rep: 0
Quote: Originally Posted by munternet View Post
That's pretty decent if it's stable
LLC7 is higher than recommended. 5 or maybe 6 seems more stable although the vcore with the cpu relaxed is higher but there are less transients/fluctuations as load comes on or off. Voltage under load can be a bit lower.
Thanks for the input, I will try setting the LLC to a slightly lower level
Col Frost is offline  
post #409 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-19-2020, 10:03 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
SneakyBushNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 245
Rep: 22 (Unique: 18)
Quote: Originally Posted by Col Frost View Post
AVX offset is 0, vcore is 1.34v.
I'm not an experienced overclocker as such, haven't run prime95 yet, but have downloaded and am about to.
I have got to 5.5 too, but only on silly voltage, and 5.4 at 1.41v. I even managed 5.4 at 1.395v, but think maybe that voltage is a bit high, given my LLC level and the potential for the voltage to spike to an unacceptable high.
it's been interesting playing around with the settings, and took me a while to get the RAM seemingly stable at 3800MHz with 15-15-15-32 timings on 1.47v.
Sounds like you're well on your way to a solid overclock. Couple of tips, always keep the vcore below 1.4, you'll get serious degradation very rapidly above that level, especially with an aggressive LLC setting. Also, finish overclocking your processor to 100% where you want it and stable before touching the memory. If you're making changes to both memory and core you'll always have doubts about what caused the issue, so it's better if you're sure that one is stable prior to messing with the other.

I'd also avoid an AVX offset, personally. The majority of loads will only turbo to your avx-off speeds and you'll only really be getting those non-avx speeds on the desktop. Only a small handfull of the games I tested with were turboing to the non-avx speed with the majority topping out at the avx speeds (so for me personally it brought nothing to the table, YMMV though).

*edit* and run prime95 small fft with the AVX options unchecked for at least 10 or 15 minutes with a given setting just to see what kind of worst case scenario thermals and power draw you're looking at. To chime in on the prime95 debate it is certainly a great test to ensure stability. It's not a realistic workload, but that's why we love it.



Last edited by SneakyBushNinja; 01-19-2020 at 10:07 AM.
SneakyBushNinja is offline  
post #410 of 420 (permalink) Old 01-19-2020, 02:43 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
boostedevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seatt-hole
Posts: 127
Rep: 8 (Unique: 7)
Got rid of the 9700k for this 9900ks. Instead of making new thread figured I’d throw SS here.

9900ks, 52x, -2 AVX offset, adaptive vcore, -50 mV vcore offset, all c-states
Z390 Dark, Default LLC
Gskill 4000 XMP ram
2x480 rads, ambient/indoor temps were 65*F/18.3*C

I started out with -25 LLC but going to Default gave better temps. -25 LLC needed a -80 mV offset whereas Default I’m currently at -50mV. I would run Prime blend without AVX for 2 hours, Prime Large with AVX for 2 hours, then switching between cine r20 15 minute loops and Prime Small FFT with and without AVX until I got a wea error. Each time I got a wea error I would add -5 back to the offset and try again. Pretty happy with this current chip; I might delid etc if it ends up being a good clocker. Been testing like this since Friday and I think I’m about done with the 5.2 preset. Currently no wea errors and playing Fallen Order and Destiny 2 all afternoon.


2hr Prime blend without AVX (67* temps, 1.249 load vcore)
10 min Prime Small FFT with AVX (79* temps, 1.296 load vcore)
15 min Cine r20 loop (63* temps, 1.266 load vcore)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	3CCA8A32-DD28-4CAF-B0C9-5975CDAE3CE1.jpeg
Views:	26
Size:	250.4 KB
ID:	320158  

Click image for larger version

Name:	22A72CD7-D2E6-4A02-B78A-1CD053594B97.jpeg
Views:	22
Size:	248.8 KB
ID:	320160  

Click image for larger version

Name:	4848AB1D-A5F0-4888-86C8-AD2FD3FB8396.jpeg
Views:	27
Size:	188.3 KB
ID:	320162  


boostedevo is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off