Intel Core i7 980x Vs. Intel Core i7 2600k? - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

View Poll Results: Faster Processor?
Intel Core i7 980x 101 71.13%
Intel Core i7 2600k 41 28.87%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 

Intel Core i7 980x Vs. Intel Core i7 2600k?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 10:21 PM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 547
I read this article here:

http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/

Saw the conclusion.. "Compared to the fastest desktop processor in the world, at stock speed, the 2600k is almost 30% behind. Using KitGuru’s building skills, we cranked the voltage to 1.6, rolled the clocks up to a steady 5.1Ghz and watched it breeze past the Extreme Edition by more than 10%."

What do you guys think is the fastest processor overall?
Electric is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 10:28 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 828
Rep: 49 (Unique: 38)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electric;11882422 
I read this article here:

http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/can-the-intel-core-i7-2600k-5-1ghz-slay-its-980x-goliath/

Saw the conclusion.. "Compared to the fastest desktop processor in the world, at stock speed, the 2600k is almost 30% behind. Using KitGuru’s building skills, we cranked the voltage to 1.6, rolled the clocks up to a steady 5.1Ghz and watched it breeze past the Extreme Edition by more than 10%."

What do you guys think is the fastest processor overall?

They arent running it like most normal overclockers would. I doubt many people would run it at 1.6v for every day overclock. It looks to be a great CPU though. I just wish they would run it with normal OC voltage.

slaney30 is offline  
post #3 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:30 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Stupidhatmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 373
Rep: 18 (Unique: 17)
The 980x has 6 cores which makes it a better processor all things considered. Clock for clock the difference narrows quite a bit. If you are factoring cost then the 2600K is a better processor IMO. If you have a 1366 board I would go with the 980x, if you are starting from scratch then no question 2600k.

Stupidhatmatt is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:35 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
dejanh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,880
Rep: 105 (Unique: 76)
What a lousy test...let's test processors at stock, then lets overclock one and compare it to the stock of the other...

Even Intel is not dumb enough to put out a budget chip that can compete with it's top end chips. Clock for clock the hexa-cores will always thrash the SB chips.
dejanh is offline  
post #5 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:35 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Chewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tree House
Posts: 3,322
Rep: 205 (Unique: 183)
The 980x is an awsome processor!, but thats before you tell me the price,

either way if the tooth fairy gave me $1000 id still buy a 2600k.


Chewy is offline  
post #6 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:35 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Pillz Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,944
Rep: 131 (Unique: 120)
Stupid poll. Overclock the 980x to 5.1ghz and watch what happens.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wG5TAdvydw[/ame]

EDIT: This video shows that a 4.5ghz 980x gets 11.50 points in Cinebench compared to the 9.86 points the 2600k gets at 5.1ghz. I think that answers your question OP.

Whoever voted for the 2600k isn't very smart.



Pillz Here is offline  
post #7 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:40 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,975
Unfair comparisons? Who would run 1.6v on a 32nm chip 24/7 let alone on a 65nm Chip...

980x easily wins at stock v stock.... Just imagine a 980x at 5ghz?
Jesse^_^ is offline  
post #8 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-03-2011, 11:47 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Pillz Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,944
Rep: 131 (Unique: 120)
It's silly to even compare a hexa core i7 vs a quad core i7 anyway. A more fair comparison would be the 980x vs. the upcoming LGA 2011 socket processors.



Pillz Here is offline  
post #9 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-05-2011, 11:43 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillz Here;11883025 
It's silly to even compare a hexa core i7 vs a quad core i7 anyway. A more fair comparison would be the 980x vs. the upcoming LGA 2011 socket processors.

This... Although to be fair, the replacement for the i980 will be the 8 core ivy bridge so we may never really see true apples to apples

To me these new parts are about bang for the buck more than outright perf gains over prior core i's. Sort of odd that the tech sites are crowing as if these parts are delivering transformational perf gains when they aren't. Perf per dollar definitely.

When ivy bridge comes I'll certainly mothball my 980/1366, but I'm not chomping at the bit really based on SB.
mlambert890 is offline  
post #10 of 34 (permalink) Old 01-14-2011, 03:59 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
zo1o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Santo Domingo
Posts: 71
Rep: 2 (Unique: 2)
just like couple of guys said upthere, its not fair compare a quad core processor and a hexa core processor... im new at this overclocking world but what i know is the 980x takes the ***** out of the 2600 wish is very good and the performance is amazing compared to the prize!

BC2: zo1o | Steam: dionys_ds | Xfire: dionysds
zo1o is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off