Want to lower sandy bridge voltage, please read. - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community
Forum Jump: 

Want to lower sandy bridge voltage, please read.

 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 04:09 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
eduardmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,062
Rep: 54 (Unique: 47)
Be patient with me since english is not my native language.

So far i have been able to lower my voltage from 1.520v to 1.456v stable @ 5.1ghz. how did i do it?

i got my sandy bridge on release day and have been overclocking, trying to find out a stable highest clock with lowest voltage. People might think that it is easy but is not cause is to much time consuming. You are never satisfy with your speed cause you want you reach a new safe limit of it.

after trying so many thing and having a good batch (i know it doesnt matter much) i couldn't understand why everyone was beatting my voltage.

The problem lies in the RAM and VCCIO voltage. Sandy bridge overclocking seems to be afected by ram (size and overclocking) and VCCIO volage somehow. i see that must overclocker can achive higher core/lower voltage with only 4gb (2x2gb) while people with (2x4gb) can also reach it but with higher voltage (core voltage).

i started tweaking with all voltage. i spend 2 entire days doing this, enabling and disabling, prime95 and all. I found out that if you have 8gb and overclocking your ram is limiting to have a stable overclock with lower voltage and you might think is the CPU fault.

After working with all the voltage my motherboard has to offer, i went back to VCCIO voltage (every other voltage on auto) and notice that if i decreased it my overclocking at same VCORE would become instable (0.800v). BUT increasing VCCIO BECAME STABLE AT LOWER VCORE. i was able to decrease my vcore from 1.520v to 1.456v by increasing VCCIO voltage to 1.18V. Do not go overboard on VCCIO voltage and try to maintain 1.2v or lower.

Before my pc would not boot 5.1ghz with 1.48V and now i'm prime95 4 hours stable with 1.456v. I even think that i can go even lower.

Please do not bash my post just trying to help because that is why we are here right...
eduardmc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 04:18 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Kalak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep: 0
Nice there smile.gif
And is that with HT on?
Kalak is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 04:21 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
koven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 5,821
Rep: 204 (Unique: 180)
that's weird, in my testing with VCCIO, i've found that no difference between 1.1v and 1.2v, no effect on my vcore, still needed the same

sandy bridge 2011
┌ 2600K · TP67XE · 570 SC · AX750 · 700D · Ripjaws X · C300 · ZR24W
┌ EK HF · EK FC · RX360 · Scythe GT · FrozenQ · PrimoFlex · Bitspower

coffee lake 2019
┌ Evolv X · 9900K · TBD


koven is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 04:51 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
ugotd8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CO
Posts: 1,620
Rep: 106 (Unique: 73)
Nice post. I've been struggling with my 24/7 4.8GHz OC as of late. I've found better stability by *lowering* my VCCIO below standard in BIOS. I've tried all the BIOS revisions from Biostar, and finally noticed that Biostar's BIOS overvolts VCCIO slightly. For example, when I set it to 1.05 in BIOS, that reads 1.104 under load (per Toverclocker). When I set it to 1.025 I get 1.068 - 1.080 under load. Since then, I have gotten the machine very close to stable.

As far as increasing VCCIO to replace VCORE, the way I understand it it's really all the same, since the VCCIO is for the IMC, which is on the chip anyway. Makes sense more VCCIO needs less VCORE, but in my testing, adding VCCIO added way more heat and no stability. The consensus seems to be that high VCCIO is only needed for running really high memory frequencies.

I don't have the answer, your method may in fact work on your board. It just seems to me that this method is robbing peter to pay paul. smile.gif

Boondoggle
(9 items)
CPU
3950X
Motherboard
X570 Aorus Xtreme
GPU
GTX 1070
RAM
Gskill flareX (F4-3200C14D-16GFX)
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 EVO Plus
Power Supply
Seasonic Ultra Platinum
Cooling
Custom Water
Case
Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Operating System
W10 1909
▲ hide details ▲


ugotd8 is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 04:53 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
koven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 5,821
Rep: 204 (Unique: 180)
^ i'm gonna have to try it that way, i just recently realized too, that the tp67xe overvolts the vccio a bit

sandy bridge 2011
┌ 2600K · TP67XE · 570 SC · AX750 · 700D · Ripjaws X · C300 · ZR24W
┌ EK HF · EK FC · RX360 · Scythe GT · FrozenQ · PrimoFlex · Bitspower

coffee lake 2019
┌ Evolv X · 9900K · TBD


koven is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old 02-16-2011, 08:59 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Scorpion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,257
Rep: 120 (Unique: 111)
^

Also noticed that.

I tried 1.025v vccio to counter the overvoltage and it was stable gaming for a day or so, I put it (VCCIO) back up to stock cause I was paranoid of idle BSOD's but it never happened. If I BSOD I will try lowering it again. Yea I was having some stability issues at 1.43v 5ghz I bumped it up to 1.44 and it seems good. The problem was that it passed every stress test including 8 hour blend but when gaming it only drew like 1.42v instead of 1.43v so I overvolted to counter this.

dust bucket
(14 items)
CPU
Intel i7 3930k 4.6 1.37v
Motherboard
Asus Rampage IV Ext.
GPU
EVGA 1080TI FTW3 Hybrid 2050/6147
RAM
Samsung 2133 9-10-10-28 1t
Hard Drive
3x Samsung Sata SSD
Power Supply
EVGA 1300G2
Cooling
EVGA CLC280 aio
Case
Fractal Arc Midi R2
Operating System
Win 10 stripped
Monitor
Benq XL2420T 120hz
Keyboard
Corsair K70 / Cherry Reds
Mouse
Finalmouse Ultralight 2
Mousepad
Steelseries QCK+
Audio
Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless
▲ hide details ▲
Scorpion667 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off