Z370 / Z390 VRM Discussion Thread - Page 4 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

Z370 / Z390 VRM Discussion Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-06-2017, 12:02 PM
Newb to Overclock.net
 
mouacyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,806
Rep: 166 (Unique: 123)
Anyone know if the VRM on the Asus Strix Z370 ITX is upgraded from the Z270 version? Considering the higher power draw of Z370, I certainly hope it is but need to know specifics. If anyone can share its VRM details, thanks.

CPU: Q6600 X5470 2100T 1680V2 9900K
GPU: 8800GT 9800GTX+ 750Ti 1080Ti
RAM: 2x8GBTZ
Gentoo64 in Water
(14 items)
LGA775 X5470
(6 items)
CPU
9900K 5GHz 1.224v
Motherboard
EVGA Z370 Micro
GPU
MSI 1080TI GXEK 2100.5/12627
RAM
16GB Trident Z 4000C16
Hard Drive
970 EVO 500GB
Power Supply
Seasonic X850 Gold
Cooling
480mm Radiator Custom
Case
Silverstone FT03
Operating System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Operating System
Gentoo Linux 64 Multi-Lib
Monitor
Acer Predator XB271UH 165Hz
Keyboard
Logitech G710+
Mouse
Logitech G502
Audio
Sound Blaster Z
CPU
X5470 4GHz (stock v)
Motherboard
GA-EP45-UD3P
GPU
EVGA 9800 GTX+ 512MB
RAM
8GB 4x2GB GSkill 1066MHz DDR2
Cooling
XSPC Rasa, D5 + Res, 240mm Rad
Case
Lian-Li PC7-HX
▲ hide details ▲
mouacyk is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-06-2017, 12:12 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
asdkj1740's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 997
Rep: 12 (Unique: 6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaC View Post

IMHO the Taichi is the same price and comes with wifi + audio AMP and supposedly better VRM components (if it's the Fairchild FDPC5030SG ones as on Fatal1ty pro)
Back of the board has doublers.

Also this confirms the Killer SLI is bad. It doesn't even have USB 3.1 gen2 , dual BIOS, or ALC1220, so for the $10 price difference to the Extreme4 it is really bad.

The VRM is at least $20 upgrade , audio is minimal (maybe $10) , USB 3.1 probably $15-20 based on add-in card pricing.

The Taichi is using Fairchild FDPC5030SG parts while the Extreme4 looks to use Sinopower SM7341EH.

FAIRCHILD http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions/product.do?id=FDPC5030SG
Channel 1
RDS(on) = 5.0mΩ @ V_GS = 10V , I_D = 17A
RDS(on) = 6.5mΩ @ V_GS = 4.5V , I_D = 14A
2ns rise time (10ns max), 2ns fall time (10ns max)
Channel 2
2.4mΩ @ V_GS = 10V , I_D = 25A
3.0mΩ @ V_GS = 4.5V , I_D = 22A
4ns rise time (10ns max) , 3ns fall time (10ns max)

SINOPOWER SM7341EH www.sinopowersemi.com/temp/SM7341EHKP_datasheet.pdf
Channel 1
30V/24A,
RDS(ON) = 3.9mΩ (max.) @ V_GS = 10V
RDS(ON) = 6.5mΩ (max.) @ V_GS = 4.5V
9.6ns rise time, 19ns fall time
Channel 2
30V/44A,
RDS(ON) = 1.2mΩ (max.) @ V_GS =10V <--- the marketing number comes from here
RDS(ON) = 2mΩ (max.) @ V_GS =4.5V
14ns rise time, 25ns fall time

asdkj1740 , the ubiq parts might be what are used on MSI GPUs.
QN3101 high side , QN3107 low side seems to be what is on Zotac's GTX 1080 Ti amp
asrock has been cheaping out on audio part in recent generation..
asdkj1740 is offline  
post #33 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-06-2017, 01:35 PM
⤷ αC
 
AlphaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10,661
Rep: 871 (Unique: 575)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asdkj1740 View Post

exactly, i have no idea why on the back of the taichi pcb there are 12 little ic which seem to be all drivers...

https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/intersil/documents/isl6/isl6596.pdf
should be this model..
it is just a driver, not a doubler, i guess...
although it states that it can driver two dual n channel mosfet, there are two pin (UGATE (Pin 1) & LGATE (Pin 5)) for high side and low side respectively.

the question then is, where the f are those doublers! there is no way for that pwm controller to drive true 8+4 phases.

datasheet says "Drives Two N-Channel MOSFETs"


See

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/reference/chpt-9/transistors-insulated-gate-field-effect-igfet-or-mosfet/

► Recommended GPU Projects: [email protected] , [email protected] (FP64) (AMD moreso) ► Other notable GPU projects: [email protected] (Nvidia), GPUGrid (Nvidia) ► Project list


AlphaC is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #34 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 01:39 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
VRMfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 133
Rep: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by br0da View Post

@αC: Impressive post, awesome!
I'd guess it's a 8+4+1+1 since I can't find any other converters for VCCIO and VCCSA but that wouldn't fit the doubler sheme. headscratch.gif

Edit: I'm going to update this post and the hardwareluxx list as soon as I can but atm I'm quite busy and there's a huge amount of info that needs to be added.

Edit2:
Due to mosfet count per phase I'd expect this to run in 4+1 mode with one doubler used for VCCGT (can be seen in the picture near the inductor).
I'd agree with asdkj1740's interpretation of the cheap MSI design.

Edit3: I'm drowning in Reviews!
http://www.coolpc.com.tw/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=243608&sid=5953aa46427649d74420df2cd02cb957
-> Intersil drivers on the backside of the Taichi:

I still don't get how this design works. headscratch.gif

http://www.coolpc.com.tw/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=243595&sid=5953aa46427649d74420df2cd02cb957
http://www.coolpc.com.tw/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=243584&sid=5953aa46427649d74420df2cd02cb957
https://www.chiphell.com/article-18765-1.html
https://www.overclockers.ua/motherboard/asus-rog-strix-z370-e-gaming/
So Asus Z370 Strix E/F have worse VRM than X370-F? I mean, i have 10 IR3555s and this uses classic HS+LS config with the SiRa fets.
VRMfreak is offline  
post #35 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 02:23 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
HKPolice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Rep: 0
Here's the spec sheet for the mosfets on the Gigabyte Aorus Gaming 7: https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/isl9/isl99227-27b.pdf

Efficiency looks impressive but the rise/fall times seem a bit slow? I'm not sure which specs are important.
HKPolice is offline  
post #36 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 04:25 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
VRMfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 133
Rep: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKPolice View Post

Here's the spec sheet for the mosfets on the Gigabyte Aorus Gaming 7: https://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/isl9/isl99227-27b.pdf

Efficiency looks impressive but the rise/fall times seem a bit slow? I'm not sure which specs are important.
The times are related to efficiency, so you just look on the graph and you're gtg.
Tr/Tf are used in HS switching heat loss calculation which goes like this: Psw= Vin * 0.5 * Iout * (Tr+Tf)s * Fsw
The times dont really matter on LowSide
VRMfreak is offline  
post #37 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 06:22 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
br0da's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 249
Rep: 22 (Unique: 18)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaC View Post

The Taichi is using Fairchild FDPC5030SG parts while the Extreme4 looks to use Sinopower SM7341EH.

What is the guess about the Extreme4 FETs based on? smile.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by asdkj1740 View Post

it is just a driver, not a doubler, i guess...
[...]
the question then is, where the f are those doublers! there is no way for that pwm controller to drive true 8+4 phases.

Yes these are just 12 drivers.
My guess is that the controller runs in 4+2 mode, ASRock is using each PWM signal for two phases.
The last two phases are for VCCIO and VCCSA.

Having @Nickshih here for clearing things up would be great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VRMfreak View Post

So Asus Z370 Strix E/F have worse VRM than X370-F?

Yes you are right about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VRMfreak View Post

The times dont really matter on LowSide

For lowside it matters as much as for highside.
br0da is offline  
post #38 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 06:25 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
VRMfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 133
Rep: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by br0da View Post

For lowside it matters as much as for highside.
But when lowside has most of its losses as resistive (conductive), then the Tr/Tf have less impact on the overall efficiency compared to highside (???????)
VRMfreak is offline  
post #39 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 06:32 AM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
br0da's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 249
Rep: 22 (Unique: 18)
Okay of course the impact of switching losses on the overall efficiency is lower if the conductive losses are ways too high. biggrin.gif
But still each MOSFET in a buck converter is getting switched two times each period no matter if it's used as a control or sync FET.
br0da is offline  
post #40 of 4127 (permalink) Old 10-07-2017, 08:14 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Zyther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 302
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by VRMfreak View Post

So Asus Z370 Strix E/F have worse VRM than X370-F? I mean, i have 10 IR3555s and this uses classic HS+LS config with the SiRa fets.

Aww I was really hoping to maybe get one of the z370e or f

How bad are the vrms for over clocking on it. Is it just they will use more power?



Zyther is offline  
Reply

Tags
K6 Motherboard , Msi , voltage regulator , z370 vrm , z390 , z390 vrm

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off