Valley Benchmark vs Heaven Benchmark - - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

Valley Benchmark vs Heaven Benchmark

Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 12-07-2017, 01:27 PM - Thread Starter
Linux Lobbyist
-javier-'s Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 865
Rep: 24 (Unique: 16)
How come i see peeps with newer cards running heaven benchmark instead of valley which is new?
-javier- is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 12-07-2017, 02:52 PM
Blameless's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 30,086
Rep: 3135 (Unique: 1869)
Because the benchmarks are quite different.

Heaven is more geometry heavy and Valley stresses memory better.

...rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law,' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual. -- Thomas Jefferson
Blameless is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 12-10-2017, 03:27 PM
New to
Retrorockit's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 611
Rep: 28 (Unique: 13)
I guess I'll post in this thread since my question might be relevant here.
First off I like to over clock old Dell computers. Workstations, old Pentium 4 beasts with Core2 extremes. I decided to try a low end $20 Optiplex 380 that I thought had some hidden potential. i started with simple drop in mods that anybody could do for my baseline.
Q9505S 65W 2.83GHz. (2.9 now) 8GB DDR3 1066 RAM, 120GB SSD, and Zotac GTX1050Ti 4GB mini.
It runs all the benchmarks (FS, SD, CZ,CB,PM,GB,3DM11) just fine and scores 93fps in Heaven, and 61fps in Valley.
But in Valley it Has an issue. 15fps minimum. It seems to hang alittle every now and then. Mostly when panning or zooming out and there is a lot of new scenery to draw.
I can think of a couple things this could be.
1- The dreaded CPU bottleneck. But Firestrike is OK so I don't think that's it.
2- The 4GB GPU is taking up too much system ram and it's a RAM bottleneck. Windows Performance page says 3.7GB RAM "shared" with GPU.

I have a similar performing GTX760 ITX 2GB that I haven't tried yet. It would require a PSU upgrade and I want to explore the budget mods first.
Does anybody know if the 4GB GPU / Valley combo requires over 8GB RAM? I'm already running 2x what Dell says it supports.
I advise people at Tomshardware about upgrading old delll office computers so I would like to know if the 4GB GPU is a step too far.

I went to Game Debate and ran the Can I Run it program and found out that 16GB RAM is recommended. 8GB is the minimum. I think the 4GB GPU is making it worse. It will be funny if a game improves with a lesser GPU. Yheir result said it would run 100% on low, and "Too Buggy" due to the RAM issue. The Xeon 5470 I plan on swapping in seems to be just right though.

Dell Dimension E520 [email protected]
Delta GFB1212VHG, 8GB DDR2-800
R9-285 ITX 2GB DDR5, 240GB SSD
Retrorockit is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off