Do you use FurMark, why or why not? [Poll] - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

View Poll Results: Do you use FurMark?
Yes 26 34.21%
No, I use other tests 31 40.79%
No! It destroys your GPU! 16 21.05%
No, not applicable 3 3.95%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 

Do you use FurMark, why or why not? [Poll]

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-15-2013, 11:45 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Colorado, US
Posts: 574
Rep: 44
I was recently reading a thread here about a person who was getting 100 degree C temperatures from running FurMark at stock clocks (that was an isolated issue that I think is resolved now). In that thread though, I saw several people arguing that FurMark is not a useful test and only serves to damage hardware. While I have always known it is not representative of real usage, I had not heard before that it should be avoided. I personally use it for a couple minutes at a time to get an idea if my core clock and voltage are remotely stable or not, then proceed to run benchmark type tests (3DMark) for a more realistic stress test.

In your opinion:
Is FurMark useful?
Are you concerned about hardware lifespan from it?
More generally, what do you use for stability testing?



frogger4 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-15-2013, 11:50 PM
Tech Enthusiast
 
deafboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 11,958
Rep: 430
I don't because it was advised against from the card manufacturer... not worried about temps or anything, there just isn't any point.

Fold.

IN HONOR OF SYRILLIAN, R.I.P.
ASUS ROG Rampage IV Black Owners Club || PNW Overclockers Club
BMW TJ07 Build Log -- The Ultimate Cooling Machine
2 year anniversary In Remembrance of a Great - RIP Syrillian
Overkill FreeNAS
(11 items)
Play Server
(10 items)
CPU
Intel i7 3930k @4.8-5.2
Motherboard
Asus Rampage IV Black Edition
GPU
nVidia Titan XP
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB
Hard Drive
Intel 750 400GB
Hard Drive
Intel 750 1.2TB
Power Supply
Corsair AX1200i
Cooling
2x Swiftech D5 w/ EK Dual Pump Top
Cooling
XSPC EX480, EX360 & 2x Phobya 1080
Cooling
EK Supremacy EVO CPU Block
Cooling
EK Advanced 250mL Res
Cooling
Lamptron FC-5V2
Cooling
EK Rampage IV BE Water Block
Cooling
Copper Tubing w/ push fittings
Cooling
EK-FC Titan XP Copper/Acetal
Case
Silverstone TJ07, heavily modified
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Samsung U28D590D 4K
Keyboard
Leopold Otaku
Mouse
Corsair M65
Mouse
Corsair MM600
Audio
Sennheiser HD595 / HD428 / HD280
Audio
Corsair SP2500
Other
Mellanox Connectx-2 10Gb SFP+ NIC
CPU
E5-2670v1
CPU
E5-2670v1
Motherboard
Supermicro X9DRL-iF
Hard Drive
12x HGST 4TB CoolSpin
Hard Drive
6x WD Red 8TB
Hard Drive
SanDisk Ultra II 960TB SSD
Power Supply
Corsair AX750
Cooling
2x Noctua nh-u9dxi4
Cooling
3x Scythe AP-30
Case
Norco 4224
Operating System
FreeNAS
CPU
Intel Xeon L5640
CPU
Intel Xeon L5640
Motherboard
Dell R710 Mobo
RAM
Hynix 144GB DDR3 ECC PC3L-10600R
Hard Drive
Intel X25-M G2 80GB
Power Supply
Redundant 840W PSU
Case
Dell 710 2.5" - Google Search Appliance
Other
Mellanox Connectx-2 10Gb SFP+ NIC
Other
Dell Perc H700 Raid Controller
Other
Dell iDRAC6 Enterprise
▲ hide details ▲


deafboy is offline  
post #3 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-15-2013, 11:53 PM
Probably sleep deprived
 
PhilWrir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Murrican Southwest
Posts: 5,581
Rep: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by deafboy View Post

I don't because it was advised against from the card manufacturer... not worried about temps or anything, there just isn't any point.

Fold.

Generally speaking, Overclocking is advised against too and folding does pretty much the same thing to the card, albeit a bit more gently. biggrin.gif

I use it for preliminary testing.
20 minutes stable in furmark means I can graduate to gaming benches and folding for longer term stability testing and use.

So, Yes its useful, and no im not worried about lifespan.
If my temps havent stabilized within 20 minutes, i have other problems besides stability to deal with.
As long as they level out at a reasonable level, im fine.
Furmark is basically worst case scenario anyway.

"In a relatively short time we've taken a system built to resist destruction by nuclear weapons and made it vulnerable to toasters." — Jeff Jarmoc


PhilWrir is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 12:01 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,624
Rep: 365
how else you gonna heat a cold room?? gtx 480's ftw thumb.gif
Master__Shake is offline  
post #5 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 12:05 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Capt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,148
Rep: 148
I have always used FurMark when bought a new GPU. If your GPU survives FurMark then you have nothing to worry about. I don't think it can kill your GPU even if you leave it for 24hrs unless you have a crappy case with zero airflow or the cooler on the card is crap but otherwise you have nothing to worry about.
Capt is offline  
post #6 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 12:16 AM
Retired Staff
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Here nor there
Posts: 25,201
Rep: 1299
Furmark doesn't do much more than tell you how hot your card can get.

Passed Furmark plenty of times only to have games crash.

These are some old furmark power figures of mine.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
Quote:
Uninstalled the 480, booted, kill a watt displayed 120w.

Test numbers below, efficiency not figured in.
All numbers read from the kill a watt


No GPU 120w

Desktop

GPU idle .91v/145w = 25w
GPU-Z open 1.0v/190w = 70w


Crysis

Stock speeds 1.0v/340w = 220w
830/1660/1000 1.063v/390w = 270w
875/1750/1000 1.138v/448w = 328w


L4D2

Stock speeds 1.0v/242w = 122w


Collatz Conjecture

Stock speeds 1.0v/275w = 155w
830/1660/1000 1.063v/325w = 205w
875/1750/1000 1.138v/376w = 256w


[email protected]

Stock speeds 1.0v/276w = 156w
800/1600/1000 1.10v/342w = 222w


Power Virus Furmark

Stock speeds 1.0v/400w = 280w
Stock speeds 1.063v/452w = 332w
Stock speeds 1.138v/506w = 386w

830/1660/1000 1.063v/502w = 382w
875/1750/1000 1.138v/580w = 460w





Remember, efficiency not figured in.

I find CBT to be more reliable as a stability test.


grunion is offline  
post #7 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 03:13 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
glina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 430
Rep: 12
Yes. I use it to check how my cooling mods affect temperatures. It's fast, reliable and the only thing to guarantee a maximum load.
I don't want my card to overheat under any load, and that includes Furmark.
Farcry 3 actually comes prette close to Furmark as far as extreme temperatures go, it just takes more time to get there.
glina is offline  
post #8 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 03:26 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
chalamah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 267
Rep: 8
I don't see the point in furmark really. It makes my GPU and VRMs get way hotter than they will in any game and therefore stops me from overclocking further because it just gets uncomfortably hot. Unigine Heaven is what I have been using. I can go as far as I can knowing that the temperatures I see during the run are going to be what i get running the latest titles. Also like someone else mentioned before me, being stable in furmark doesn't mean your stable for all games too.
chalamah is offline  
post #9 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 05:05 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
verbatim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 315
Rep: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by frogger4 View Post

I was recently reading a thread here about a person who was getting 100 degree C temperatures from running FurMark at stock clocks (that was an isolated issue that I think is resolved now). In that thread though, I saw several people arguing that FurMark is not a useful test and only serves to damage hardware. While I have always known it is not representative of real usage, I had not heard before that it should be avoided. I personally use it for a couple minutes at a time to get an idea if my core clock and voltage are remotely stable or not, then proceed to run benchmark type tests (3DMark) for a more realistic stress test.

In your opinion:
Is FurMark useful?
Are you concerned about hardware lifespan from it?
More generally, what do you use for stability testing?

That guy is new to the game who left furmark on for ages while he went off somewhere. He came back to a cooking card.
I use it the same as you, for little tiny bursts. I dont think it should be used for new guys as it provides no real data for them. It causes confusion due to AMD and Nvidia throttling with it and can cause damage if left too long.

♦░▒█▓▒░♦ [Official] NVIDIA GTX 780 Ti Owner's Club] ♦░▒█▓▒░♦
verbatim is offline  
post #10 of 50 (permalink) Old 02-16-2013, 09:44 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
sinnedone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,513
Rep: 74
Ive also found running furmark stable for 30 minutes or so only to completely crash in games.

Ive found heaven and 3dmark better tests for stable overclocks. Follow that by a couple of hours of gaming and your set. smile.gif

Temperature wise to test cooling mods seems like the best use case for furmark.

sinnedone is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off