[Official] - Xeon X5660-X58 Review & Discussion [and Xeon L5639 benchmarks inside] - Page 3 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

View Poll Results: Was my review helpful?
Yes 250 95.42%
No 12 4.58%
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 

[Official] - Xeon X5660-X58 Review & Discussion [and Xeon L5639 benchmarks inside]

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #21 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-23-2014, 03:59 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Kana-Maru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,927
Rep: 198 (Unique: 128)
I can only suggest the Asus Sabertooth X58. It's the only board I have used for years. I'm used to the board, but it might be overwhelming to new users. It does offer some nice settings and features.

Steam: Xeon_Kana_Maru
Origin: Xeon-Kana-Maru
Kana-Maru is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-23-2014, 04:05 PM
new to OCN?
 
PontiacGTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 26,368
Rep: 1536 (Unique: 924)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kana-Maru View Post

I can only suggest the Asus Sabertooth X58. It's the only board I have used for years. I'm used to the board, but it might be overwhelming to new users. It does offer some nice settings and features.
i would like a cheaper mobo.hiw much that sabertooth costs?
PontiacGTX is offline  
post #23 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-23-2014, 04:08 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Bonn93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 291
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
I've come from your other thread, such a good job on everything. The X58 platform still performs and surprises everyone.

I'm trying to find a 6 core now!

Bonn93 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #24 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-23-2014, 04:40 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Kana-Maru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,927
Rep: 198 (Unique: 128)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacGTX View Post

i would like a cheaper mobo.hiw much that sabertooth costs?

Thanks to the widespread news of the hex cores, USED Asus Sabertooth X58’s have increased in price. It’s going to be hard to find a cheap one now. Anywhere from $230-$300+ is what I’ve been seeing since late last year. Sabertooth X58 were as low as $110-150, but not anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonn93 View Post

I've come from your other thread, such a good job on everything. The X58 platform still performs and surprises everyone
I'm trying to find a 6 core now!

Thank man! X58 users should unite. We are still using an extremely viable platform that can still run any graphic card released today. I’m sure the platform does surprise everyone, which is probably why the X58 boards have been skyrocketing over the past year or so. I saw a Sabertooth X58 for $800 brand new on Amazon. Funny thing is someone actually purchased it. Now there’s only 1 for $229.99. I’m going to posting my gaming benchmarks soon.

A lot of the 6-cores have been selling out all across Ebay. Good luck man. I hope you find a nice chip one that's good and not defective.

Steam: Xeon_Kana_Maru
Origin: Xeon-Kana-Maru
Kana-Maru is offline  
post #25 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-23-2014, 06:33 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Vlasov_581's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX/Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 8,608
Rep: 540 (Unique: 461)
yea prices are hella low on the x5XXX series. on eBay you can grab an SR-2 for $350ish, and 2 x5650s for $250ish for both, and have a 12C/24T computing monster eek.gif



Vlasov_581 is offline  
post #26 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-24-2014, 05:41 AM
new to OCN?
 
PontiacGTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 26,368
Rep: 1536 (Unique: 924)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlasov_581 View Post

yea prices are hella low on the x5XXX series. on eBay you can grab an SR-2 for $350ish, and 2 x5650s for $250ish for both, and have a 12C/24T computing monster eek.gif
where do people sell their sr 2?
PontiacGTX is offline  
post #27 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-24-2014, 01:28 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Kana-Maru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,927
Rep: 198 (Unique: 128)
Alright I've gotten getting my GPU\Gaming Benchmark scores together. I will be updating my post on the first page with all new info I post throughout this topic. I've taken the L5639 info from my L5639 topic and compared both processors - here:

The L5639 topic is here:
https://www.overclock.net/t/1442498/x58-in-2014-i-was-thinking-about-upgrading-to-x79-or-haswell-l5639-comparison-review

Alright here are my Gaming Benchmarks. I will post more benchmarks as I complete them. I’m going to be comparing my X5660, L5639 and i7-960 benchmarks. If you would like to compare your scores please post them. I tried to remember some my i7-960 scores. 4Ghz-4.2Ghz is all most gamers will need anyways with Hex-cores. The X5660 will be a better choice if you stream games online in HD. It should be able to handle the load and specific settings in certain streaming programs for high end CPUs.

GTX 670 2-way SLI @ 980Mhz [except 3DMark Cloud Gate and Vantage which was ran @ 915Mhz]

3DMark 11:



[email protected] = P16449
[email protected] = P15692
[email protected] was around P12000-P13000

Looks like the GTX 670 2GB 2-Way SLI is pushing max with the Hex cores. The X5660 increased my Graphics [+174 points], Physics [+1,736 points] and Combined Score [+809 points]. If I could get both GPUs to run @1000Mhz+ I’m sure I could probably crack the 17000 mark. The benchmarks were smooth with Hex-CPUs. To the naked eye I couldn’t notice any difference. My GPUs are running on air so heat did become an issue.

3DMark Vantage:



[email protected] = P47325
[email protected] = P45164

Here is another minor difference in score.

3DMark Ice Storm:



[email protected] = P197876
[email protected] = P173914
i7-960 @ 4Ghz = P157635

Now we can see some bigger differences in the score and performance %. The X5660 scored 26% higher than the i7-960. The X5660 performed 14% better than the L5639. The X5660 performed pretty good with the GTX 670s @ 960Mhz.

3DMark Fire Strike:



[email protected] = 11205
[email protected] = 10900
[email protected] = 9787

Using Hex cores definitely makes the benchmark much smoother. The X5660 offered a 14.4% increase over my [email protected] and only 2.7% over the L5639. Fire Strike depends on the GPU.

Steam: Xeon_Kana_Maru
Origin: Xeon-Kana-Maru
Kana-Maru is offline  
post #28 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-24-2014, 01:30 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Kana-Maru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,927
Rep: 198 (Unique: 128)
Real Time Benchmarks

The real time benchmarks are games that I have played while capturing real time data. Instead of relying on a benchmark tool found in a lot of games nowadays, I play through the levels looking for micro stutter and or delays. The L5639 handled Maxed High End games like Crysis 3, Tomb Raider and Metro: LL etc. Let's see how the X5660 handle Crysis 3,

GTX 670 2-Way SLI @ 915Mhz

Welcome to the Jungle - 1920x1080p

[email protected]
CPU Max Temps:58c
GPU 1: 83c
GPU 2: 71c

Those temps were pretty much steady throughout the benchmark and gameplay. Due to heat concerns I had to run the GPU cores @ 915Mhz instead of 980Mhz.



FPS:
Avg: 53
Max: 136

Min: 18

As you can not much has changed in this category. I actually gained 3 frames per second and the frame rate was well above 60fps throughout the level. I’m guessing it’s safe to say that 4Ghz-4.2Ghz will be fine for high end gaming with the Hex cores. With no more CPU bottlenecking I’ve finally hit the max on my graphic cards. I was only getting 25fps to 35fps with my [email protected] Two extra cores make a huge difference. The L5639 and X5660 is fine for high end gaming.




Average Frame time: 19ms
My frame times were slightly better. The game played fine on both CPUs. The higher clocked X5660 gave it a edge over the L5639. However, I’m sure if both CPUs were clocked at the same speed the difference wouldn’t matter. just as they do not now. So i7-920 to i7-960 and pretty much all Bloomfield users will see a tremendous upgrade. Gaming wise there is no comparisons.

Steam: Xeon_Kana_Maru
Origin: Xeon-Kana-Maru
Kana-Maru is offline  
post #29 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-24-2014, 03:09 PM
new to OCN?
 
PontiacGTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 26,368
Rep: 1536 (Unique: 924)
People with SB/IB/HW give your results

OP could you test BF4,BF3,Crysis 1,2,3,Metro LL,Metro 2033,Alien vs predator 3,Grid 2,CIV 5,Starcraft II?
PontiacGTX is offline  
post #30 of 8108 (permalink) Old 01-24-2014, 04:47 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
Kana-Maru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,927
Rep: 198 (Unique: 128)
I don't have BF3 or BF4.

Steam: Xeon_Kana_Maru
Origin: Xeon-Kana-Maru
Kana-Maru is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off