[Official] - X58 Xeon Club - - Page 1485 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

View Poll Results: How many years have you owned your X58 - Tylersburg platofrm?
More than 1 year 75 11.94%
More than 2 years 33 5.25%
More than 3 years 46 7.32%
More than 4 years 61 9.71%
More than 5 years 118 18.79%
More than 6 years 295 46.97%
Voters: 628. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 

[Official] - X58 Xeon Club -

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #14841 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-03-2019, 02:24 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 10
Rep: 0
I'd say the fact I have all 6 slots filled is why I need a higher QPI/Vtt
Zetren is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14842 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-03-2019, 02:36 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 40
Rep: 0
Quote: Originally Posted by Zetren View Post
I'd say the fact I have all 6 slots filled is why I need a higher QPI/Vtt
Totally. If they aren't all matching that could contribute to unstable ram as well

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
MayoTheGreat is offline  
post #14843 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-03-2019, 03:52 PM
Mentally Insane User
 
99belle99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 418
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
Yea I forgot to mention I only use 3 sticks.

Ryzen 7 3700X Owner!

Radeon RX 5700 XT Owner!
99belle99 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #14844 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-16-2019, 08:39 PM
Mentally Insane User
 
99belle99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 418
Rep: 5 (Unique: 5)
Still rocking my X58 build. Playing GTA V at 4k 60Hz is pretty good going for this 10 year old build. Gone through a fair few graphics cards over the years and SSD's. HyperX Predator PCIe SSD is my current C drive with a 960GB SATA III SSD for storage and games. The Hyper X is faster than SATA but not up there with current NVMe SSD's.

I've had a graphics card not really worth mentioning as I didn't game at first and then a GTX 580, R9 290, R9 Fury X, Rx Vega 56 and my current Rx 5700 XT which I am amazed with. It's a great card beats out the 56 easily.

Ryzen 7 3700X Owner!

Radeon RX 5700 XT Owner!
99belle99 is offline  
post #14845 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-17-2019, 12:38 AM
Guru
 
SmOgER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,065
Rep: 29 (Unique: 26)
VTT was just shy of 1.4V and running 3.74Ghz uncore (DDR3 2200 CL10) for 3 consecutive years of PC running almost constantly (idling when I'm not around or doing some stuff by itself overnight and whatnot). And only now I'm starting to see some manageable degradation. What did I do do manage it? Of course up the VTT a couple of notches!

Xeon X5650 @ 4.0Ghz | Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME | Tactical DDR3 TC 12GB @ 2200Mhz 10-10-10-26 1T | 3.74Ghz Uncore

Last edited by SmOgER; 09-17-2019 at 12:42 AM.
SmOgER is offline  
post #14846 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-17-2019, 03:50 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 40
Rep: 0
Quote: Originally Posted by SmOgER View Post
VTT was just shy of 1.4V and running 3.74Ghz uncore (DDR3 2200 CL10) for 3 consecutive years of PC running almost constantly (idling when I'm not around or doing some stuff by itself overnight and whatnot). And only now I'm starting to see some manageable degradation. What did I do do manage it? Of course up the VTT a couple of notches!
You actually probably want to bring down the vtt and the uncore. Vtt on xeons shouldn't run above 1.35 or they degrade which is what your seeing. If you have to drop your ram speed down to 2000 or 1800 you won't be losing much accessing speed. By lowering the clock speed of the ram you may also be able to tighten timings so you won't even notice a difference.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
MayoTheGreat is offline  
post #14847 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-17-2019, 07:32 AM
Guru
 
SmOgER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,065
Rep: 29 (Unique: 26)
Quote: Originally Posted by MayoTheGreat View Post
You actually probably want to bring down the vtt and the uncore. Vtt on xeons shouldn't run above 1.35 or they degrade which is what your seeing. If you have to drop your ram speed down to 2000 or 1800 you won't be losing much accessing speed. By lowering the clock speed of the ram you may also be able to tighten timings so you won't even notice a difference.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
On X58 platform RAM and uncore speed is hands down better than tight timings and low speed - tested numerous times. If it took the whole 3 years for some degradation to occur I simply don't sweat about it. Plus it's not like these CPUs are expensive nowadays anyway.

Xeon X5650 @ 4.0Ghz | Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME | Tactical DDR3 TC 12GB @ 2200Mhz 10-10-10-26 1T | 3.74Ghz Uncore
SmOgER is offline  
post #14848 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-17-2019, 07:38 AM
Guru
 
SmOgER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,065
Rep: 29 (Unique: 26)
So IMHO at the present time swearing by that magical VTT number of 1.35 or uncore ("max 3.6Ghz"?) is ridiculous. If it degrades it degrades - but that's very unlikely to happen soon. Worst case scenario - you replace a CPU for affordable price and OC it again.

Xeon X5650 @ 4.0Ghz | Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME | Tactical DDR3 TC 12GB @ 2200Mhz 10-10-10-26 1T | 3.74Ghz Uncore
SmOgER is offline  
post #14849 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-17-2019, 05:24 PM
Fix it till its broke
 
Owterspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 667
Rep: 9 (Unique: 5)
1.35v max vtt is ridiculous. I gave my x5690 es 1.39v for at least 5 years 24/7. I found with my x58 that it was hard on power supply’s. Anyways, I always thought the people that recommended a max vcore of 1.35v was also laughable. Thats pretty much where mine started lol and just means they need to work on their cooling. Mine needs 1.275 for 4000 and 1.58 for 4800. As for tight timings at lower mem speeds, you gotta run a high uncore, you won’t generate the bandwidth of high speed ram, but you can nail down that latency. I run mine with some old Super Talent Chrome 2000c8 @ 1600 6-6-6-20 1T 1.655v. My x5690 clocks better than my old 970 did, but my 970 could run fast ram. Wouldn’t mind getting a W series with all the dividers. And a new psu:/

3770K @ 4700MHz 1.35v/Thermalright True Spirit 140 Power TY-143 Push/Pull
ASRock Z77 OC Formula|8GB G.Skill Mix @ 1100MHz 9-11-9-28-2T 1.68v
EVGA GTX 980 Classified 3988 @ 1497/2001|Intel 545S 256 Striped
CM Silent Pro M2 850|Fractal Define R4/5x 120x38 1x 92x38|ZM-MFC2
Owterspace is offline  
post #14850 of 15514 (permalink) Old 09-18-2019, 05:41 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 10
Rep: 0
What's the consensus on HPET for this architecture, enable or disable?
Zetren is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (1 members and 3 guests)
theister
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off