| Topic Review (Newest First) |
| 11-05-2018 09:45 AM | |
| Murlocke |
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmdve
What for? A game that nobody plays.
The game has been selling very well for them, though at this point they need to rebrand it under "Enhanced Edition" or something to get rid of the negative launch day reviews. It's not the same game it was at launch. It even has multiplayer now. |
| 11-05-2018 02:44 AM | |
| termathor |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenLautner
It's difficult to say coz these people don't exactly say why they hate the game in their reviews.
They play the game for 400 hours and just say "it's bad"... ? They never mention on what ground is it bad. I see countless posts, here and there, of someone asking "should I buy, given the negative reviews". And that's for brilliant games with lots of contents ... |
| 11-04-2018 09:24 AM | |
| keikei |
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrews2547
Nice, they've nearly finished developing it.
I'm not quite sure. Murray is an odd one. He can surely create whatever game he wants next, but he seems to be laser focused on finishing NMS. We just don't know what 'finish' means here. Only Murray does. |
| 11-04-2018 01:32 AM | |
| KenLautner |
Quote:
Originally Posted by tpi2007
Yeah, there is something to be said about those people. What did they expect? A game that would last forever and would provide an interesting A.I. generated perpetual storyline that would have them hooked on the game forever and ever?
The game does seem to be in a vastly better place than it was when it was launched and while it may have promised the moon (and a few more rocks), I'd say that it's at least a reasonable game now for people with reasonable expectations of what can be made. They can probably still put in a second storyline for people to explore, give it more purpose, more objectives. They play the game for 400 hours and just say "it's bad"... ? They never mention on what ground is it bad. Personally all I can say is that I've paid $60 for games like Tomb Raider which I played for 12-15 hours max and then never touched. Comparitively playing NMS for 40 hours, paying only $20 for it is a much better deal. This is when I've not even done everything the game has to offer yet. I will probably go beyond 100 hour mark in this game so for $20, I fail to find any other game that can do that. And for people who complain about grinding... well the game has had a creative mode for 2 years, which gives you unlimited resources. There, all grinding eliminated. |
| 11-01-2018 08:18 AM | |
| andrews2547 | Nice, they've nearly finished developing it. |
| 11-01-2018 08:13 AM | |
| 7850K |
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmdve
What for? A game that nobody plays.
|
| 11-01-2018 08:11 AM | |
| tpi2007 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenLautner
I'm surprised people still think that NMS is a failure.
It sold well and it's still selling well. It received updates since release and has hours of content. It was the top 10 most played games worldwide couple of weeks back when they released their NMS NEXT update and it's still up there in the top 100. It's also at the top of the chart in the top sellers list with every update since 1.3 or something which was 2 years ago. Game goes on sale with every update - I got the game for $20 and have around 40 hours in the game. I'm more surprised that on Steam people have 400 hours in the game and give it a negative review. Yeah, there is something to be said about those people. What did they expect? A game that would last forever and would provide an interesting A.I. generated perpetual storyline that would have them hooked on the game forever and ever? The game does seem to be in a vastly better place than it was when it was launched and while it may have promised the moon (and a few more rocks), I'd say that it's at least a reasonable game now for people with reasonable expectations of what can be made. They can probably still put in a second storyline for people to explore, give it more purpose, more objectives. |
| 11-01-2018 05:51 AM | |
| keikei |
Quote:
Originally Posted by xenophobe
Man that guy in the video posted by the OP is so freaking annoying. I was expecting to see gamplay video, not some dolt droning on and on about patch notes plugging his reaction video of a trailer.
I have better things to do than listen to someone who does not. |
| 11-01-2018 04:23 AM | |
| KenLautner |
I'm surprised people still think that NMS is a failure. It sold well and it's still selling well. It received updates since release and has hours of content. Quote:
Originally Posted by farmdve
What for? A game that nobody plays.
It's also at the top of the chart in the top sellers list with every update since 1.3 or something which was 2 years ago. Game goes on sale with every update - I got the game for $20 and have around 40 hours in the game. I'm more surprised that on Steam people have 400 hours in the game and give it a negative review. Quote:
Judge it for yourself and don't take my word for it. I've played 397 hours so i obviously enjoyed it at one point! Now not so much!
|
| 11-01-2018 02:35 AM | |
| termathor |
Like others, I think the devs should be praised for adding *free* content, so long after release ! How cool is that ? And who else is doing this ? Heck, WB ceased to even fix Arkham Knights, 3 months after the broken release ! |
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | |
| Posting Rules | |