Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: [Recode] U.S. internet speeds rose nearly 40 percent this year Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-25-2018 12:31 PM
Shaded War Unfortunately, my internet speeds have not gone up at all and the prices only rise.

My local ISP has a monopoly over much of the area. They were awarded money from my state government to upgrade the lines for fiber but the new lines would be available to other ISPs to offer service through. So guess what, they haven't spent a cent upgrading lines to existing homes or apartments. They will only use it on new buildings to cover the installation costs. This way they can keep their monopoly over the majority of the customer base.

So they can still charge us $75/mo for 25/1 internet with a 650GB download cap.
12-25-2018 09:50 AM
ToTheSun!
Quote: Originally Posted by ttnuagmada View Post
So, that NN repeal that went into effect a few months ago is somehow responsible for speed increases that were years in the making? What good are those speed increases with data caps?
Looks like it wasn't just Imouto who didn't even read the article.
12-25-2018 01:20 AM
jagdtigger I dont live in the USA but i seriously want ISP's to leave the dark ages behind and drop asymmetric connections... 10Mbits up is way too slow (the best i could get is 20).
12-24-2018 05:56 PM
ttnuagmada So, that NN repeal that went into effect a few months ago is somehow responsible for speed increases that were years in the making? What good are those speed increases with data caps?
12-24-2018 10:34 AM
phaseshift

I've been waiting for this for a long time
12-24-2018 03:46 AM
VicsPC For all those interested, this is what you can do with high speeds, and this is to an HDD not even an SSD and have zero issues reaching and attaining that.

12-22-2018 07:09 PM
DaaQ
Quote: Originally Posted by bucdan View Post
I'm just happy that we're going somewhere. Personally, I'd be fine with 50Mb down, but I would love a higher upload speed. For some reason, copper broadband providers rather not give you symmetrical speeds, but fiber providers do.

As for the speeds still slower compared to other countries, with some countries only the size of 1 state in the US, of course it'll be easier and cheaper to build out to them, as compared to the select metro cities in the US vs the rural areas around the country.


Now as for the previous post, reason I posted them was because it was the first source I read. Agree with it or not, it was a news post that linked to the actual report which I provided in case some people didn't want to visit the "unfavorable" site. Just trying to be fair.
It's not that copper providers would rather not give symmetrical speeds, there are physical limitations which prevent it. DOCSIS 3.1 has provisions to alleviate this limitation, but there are still large technical barriers to get the performance out of it.

For example, my ISP offers 60/5, 100/10, 200/20, 500/40, and 1000/60. Reason is channel bonding AND limited bandwidth within a coax cable, modulation techniques, and downstream vs upstream carriers. D3.0 used channel bonding which I'm sure you're all familiar with the modems listing 4x4 or 16x4 or 32x4 which are the channel bonds.

My ISP uses 16 bonded channels for DOCSIS 3 with 3 upstream carriers. DOCSIS 3.1 uses OFDM modulation to combine 16 channels into one block. They must still support the other 16 D3 bonded channels tho for the older modems on the network. It's a slow upgrade process getting customers to WANT to let you come in and replace equipment.

Our system will be launching a 4th upstream carrier, but the limitations are that it will be much more susceptible to noise, (loose, old, corroded, ect connections.) which can have a massive negative impact on everyone on that particular node.
Most Coax ISP networks in the US are HFC networks. Hybrid Fiber Coax networks.

Mind you, all these "channels" are 6MHz wide analog QAM 256 carriers, the upstream carriers are QAM64, due to the susceptibility of transient noise.

Just throwing this in as a technical response to try and explain it's ust not as easy as "wanting" to not offer symmetrical DL/UL speeds. It's a compromise with trying to use the available bandwidth most effectively. Remember they have to also have video streams on the additional 6MHz transport streams. Which are usually the ones from 400MHz up towards the 1GHz spectrum.

Quote: Originally Posted by JackCY View Post
The asymmetric D/U is likely caused by ISPs not wanting to pay more for upload capacity, as in they gotta pay to who ever they are connected to for the speed or even amount they want to send out where as data flowing to them is probably "unlimited". Similar to: you don't pay the post/courier for receiving packages but you gotta pay them if you want to send any.

That's why we are seeing so much of the 100/10 nonsense connections. Sure it works for the average joe who only browses web but if you're a content creator it's a nightmare. Internally the ISP networks don't really care and are likely symmetric as is most consumer networking equipment. It's only higher up where the networks differ and you start to pay for "slots" to send data. The ISPs gotta be connected somewhere right and those are yet another networking companies who operate large networks for profit, connecting countries, having country wide networks, etc. Where as ISP only often does the last mile and aggregating these end users to a small number of lines.

30/30, last time I checked my ISP was offering something around 50/10 at same price... now I can't even search my address to see the offerings as the search results are empty for my location... other locations in town offering optic... 40/10, 100/100 for negligible more... and 250/150 for a little more. Problem is... the whole house is connected via 200/200 antenna so... yeah good luck getting 100/100 from them I bet as they would have to upgrade the antenna and there certainly wasn't any construction in recent years laying down optic cables around. Even elsewhere I'm curious how they offer optic connection in a house, maybe they finally bought optic from some telco to connect the town or they are simply trying to offer higher speed to fill in their wireless town-town capacity. As to upgrading the 200/200 house antenna, yeah well I'm not sure how many if even any people in here really care to use internet much for them to be worth it to upgrade this over $6k antenna to a higher speed probably more expensive model.

Must be nice to live in areas where optic connections were done, the town/city cares about it's residents and tries to improve offered services in reliability and speed. Thing is most places don't have optic connections and someone would have to connect the towns, then rip up the whole town's tarmac and lay cables into ground in each street to each house... oh yeah, not cheap as you can imagine.

Maybe I will go ask my ISP in person one day, see what is going on in this town with internet speed from them and if it's gonna stay as nowdays kind of behind and slow with wonky reliability. The only plus is it doesn't cost a fortune.

DSL and what not... dead, no one should be using these telco services anymore but sometimes you don't have a choice as no one wants to invest in small towns to offer better competitive services. US is far from the only country having problems with building infrastructure for up to date technologies and services. Tons of money gets poured into mobile devices/services because they also love to charge you outrageous fees for it on a monthly basis and is where the rip off telco has moved to. Even then getting good data speeds on mobile largely depends on location as again only most populated and flat terrain areas get good signal.

Another rubbish ISPs love to do is connect you to their network and not to internet really as in you gotta pay extra, and sometimes that extra is quite large monthly fee compared to what your monthly fee is for the connection itself, to get a public static IP accessible from internet.
Quote: Originally Posted by Chargeit View Post
Upload bandwidth is a joke. Currently running 200/10. Makes uploading videos a chore. Also notice the lack of upload when a game like Skyrim uploads its save data.

If I could get a solid 200/100+ I'd have to set up a nice home server.
I know your in the EU, but in response to your first sentence see the above response.

Sorry about any formatting, the new site platform sucks for people that don't know the BB code formatting as a second language, or off the top of the head.
12-22-2018 08:04 AM
konspiracy I have worked for 7 years in the WISP industry all across Texas-Oklahoma area. I work for a local WISP my buddy started 5 years ago. We have offered a max speed package of 20down and 4up. Hopefully next year we can offer 50mb down 10up but that really depends on if Ubiquity can put out an Access Point that can provide 25cx at least 70% of said speed package during peak hours. Also wireless wise we are running out of spectrum especially now that most people have 3+ wireless options. Bleed over on 20mhz channels are incredible not to mention other companies are pushing 40mhz with insane bleed over. Not only screwing their customers but ours as well.

Mass 4g implementation will be the next step in my mind. 5g will be awesome but it cuts down range from our current 5-7 miles max to roughly 2 miles. That said when I started doing this in rural Texas 7 years ago the max you could get was 5down and 1up. 4k streaming is a nightmare especially with new smart T.V.'s that auto play all content at 4k using the total 20mbs down we offer. It's not to big of a concern though as even competitors that offer 50mb cant truly offer it during peak hours, which is all customers care about anyway.
12-21-2018 04:56 AM
JackCY At those speeds it's faster bandwidth wise to transport harddrives physically to the destination XD Just worse latency. That's how bad internet speeds are at times for transmitting larger and nowadays quite normal 100GB game install data for example. Uploading videos on below 50mbps is a damn chore especially when YouTube for example also loves to throttle their download on top of it, gives priority to Chrome users, etc.
12-20-2018 03:22 PM
Jspinks020
Quote: Originally Posted by rluker5 View Post
Four years ago, my old town of Hollandale, WI pop 290 maxed out at 1.5m down and I could only get 768k. Now it is 25m down/3m up. Yours will get better. Just takes more time when less profit is involved.
No it's not better 45-50mbps and get 5-6mps...lol. sub 3 is really bad and needs to go lol. And yeah some of it is a little Pricey....Some people are still paying ALOT...

Suppose to be More Modern in 2020
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off