Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: Ryzen 2600 does boost when already overclocked? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
01-30-2019 04:23 AM
rul3s
Quote: Originally Posted by rdr09 View Post
....You got a nice motherboard. It can easily take a 7nm cpu...
Yes, that was my idea from the first day!
01-30-2019 04:09 AM
rdr09
Quote: Originally Posted by rul3s View Post
Thought that maybe, for some miliseconds and only for one core (only one reported 4.7GHz) XFR and PBO where doing it's thing!
So, with Ryzen 2600 on stock, max speed is 3.9GHz, yes? Because on stock I was reading 4.2GHz on HWMonitor.... but now I understand that maybe it's the same thing.
Just use the recommended app - HWINFO64. Uninstall others. Our non-X Ryzens do not have PBO. When OC'ed it boosts to the highest value set in BIOS. In your case, 4.1GHz. Better than stock. Set Windows Power plan to Balance and Minimum Processor State in Advance setting to around 25%, so that both Clocks and Vcore downclock. My 2700 downclocks to 1.5GHz/0.8V or about 13W at idle. I keep mine at stock cos it boosts to 4.1GHz.


You got a nice motherboard. It can easily take a 7nm cpu.
01-30-2019 04:07 AM
BroadPwns It's boosting to 4.1GHz due to XFR2.

Never mind the other part, just reread that you used HWGarbage.
01-30-2019 03:39 AM
rul3s
Quote: Originally Posted by BroadPwns View Post
HWMonitor is plain garbage, always was. How can you even consider 4.7GHz a legit score?
Thought that maybe, for some miliseconds and only for one core (only one reported 4.7GHz) XFR and PBO where doing it's thing!
So, with Ryzen 2600 on stock, max speed is 3.9GHz, yes? Because on stock I was reading 4.2GHz on HWMonitor.... but now I understand that maybe it's the same thing.
01-30-2019 03:26 AM
white owl
Quote: Originally Posted by BroadPwns View Post
HWMonitor is plain garbage, always was. How can you even consider 4.7GHz a legit score?
I had to carefully word my post to make it nicer but yeah pretty much.
01-30-2019 03:23 AM
BroadPwns HWMonitor is plain garbage, always was. How can you even consider 4.7GHz a legit score?
01-30-2019 03:23 AM
white owl 4.7ghz is wrong, HWinfo is the only software you can really trust as it gets constant updates. Also using lots of software polling your sensors together can cause issues.
Manually overclocking past your boost speed obviously negates the lower stock boost speed.


If you have something manually set to 4100mhz and something reports 4700mhz it's probably safe to say that it's an incorrect reading.
01-30-2019 03:14 AM
rul3s
Ryzen 2600 does boost when already overclocked?

Hi mates!
I have a Ryzen 2600 (my signature rig) and when on stock settings was always boosting to it's max, 3.9GHz on stock voltage 1.35v.
I saw that already on stock voltage, it does 4.1GHz, setting it on BIOS multiplier 41 and FSB 100 fixed.

The thing is that I have two monitor softwares, HWMonitor and HWInfo, and the first one reports a maximum core clock of 4.7GHz and the second one reports maximum core clock of 4.1GHz, so I don't know which one is lying.... I understand that if HWMonitor is right, 2600 can boost from oced speed as it does from stock speed, is this right? Or HWMonitor is wrong and there is no boost speed when manually ocing from UEFI?

THanks!

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off