Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: [TechPowerUP] NVIDIA Releases GeForce Drivers that Add DXR to Select GeForce GTX GPUs Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
04-14-2019 04:37 PM
UltraMega It would be cool if you could use a second card for RT the same way you can for PhysX.
04-13-2019 04:47 PM
ZealotKi11er
Quote: Originally Posted by zGunBLADEz View Post
after trying this in shadow and metro on my 1080ti, just to see whats the fuzz about, i would not trade resolution, IQ overall "HELLOW DLSS by Bleach"....
space screen reflection do the job just fine + reshade.

RT as current implementation on those games any time given considering the perf impact and what i have to trade off no good at all.. 2080ti with RT on looks pathetic as well.

conclusion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXRrpYATYl0

get the magnifying glass XD
I can see some difference but can easily dismiss them as artistic desitions. RT is so not worth it right now. We need path tracing like in Quake.
04-13-2019 03:16 PM
zGunBLADEz after trying this in shadow and metro on my 1080ti, just to see whats the fuzz about, i would not trade resolution, IQ overall "HELLOW DLSS by Bleach"....
space screen reflection do the job just fine + reshade.

RT as current implementation on those games any time given considering the perf impact and what i have to trade off no good at all.. 2080ti with RT on looks pathetic as well.

conclusion

get the magnifying glass XD
04-13-2019 01:06 PM
Celcius
04-13-2019 10:58 AM
mouacyk
Quote: Originally Posted by JackCY View Post
That's not Q2RTX or NVQ2 or what ever NV calls their unreleased version, this is Q2VKPT from github.
I run around 3/5 of 2560px and 3/4 of 1440px so 1600x1024 is close to that, around 100fps on RTX 2070.

While it's path traced it has minimal bounce and a temporal filter to speed it up, it's doing as little work as it can, hence it still looks Q2 like = as a potato.



Rescale the window. I don't think there has been an update, it has some "user friendliness" issues taken from the Q2 variant it's based on. I don't think I will bother going into the code and recompile it with some fixes, even the author didn't seem interested in making it more user friendly and while it's a nice demo of path tracing there is a lot to be tweaked and such for it to look nice, run faster and have all features. You can increase the number of bounces to get better visuals but performance will plummet, plus you have to recompile Which on Windows is a pain the way the project is setup, you have to manually compile the shaders... eh. Too much work to do only to see how it will look with more bounces and some user friendliness fixes while it runs 10fps or something lol.

If I remember right it's based on Q2PRO. Hence all the menus and what not are different from OG Q2. Some settings don't work as they don't apply to VKPT and useful settings to set but mainly to keep set resolution are missing, you can set it in config but it gets ignored or overridden.
Thanks. Wow, just 5 minutes without mouse invert and now my FPS look is messed up when going back to inverted games.
04-13-2019 10:15 AM
JackCY
Quote: Originally Posted by ChronoBodi View Post
i've tested quake 2 RTX on Titan X pascal, basically a 1080 ti.

its.... impressive for not having RT cores at all.

can do what feels to be 1080p, but fps rates of 30 to 45 fps.

1600x900 fairs a bit better, in the 50fps-55 rangeish or so.

and i find myself playing RTX quake 2 far more than i should, the lighting is so gorgeous.
That's not Q2RTX or NVQ2 or what ever NV calls their unreleased version, this is Q2VKPT from github.
I run around 3/5 of 2560px and 3/4 of 1440px so 1600x1024 is close to that, around 100fps on RTX 2070.

While it's path traced it has minimal bounce and a temporal filter to speed it up, it's doing as little work as it can, hence it still looks Q2 like = as a potato.

Quote: Originally Posted by mouacyk View Post
How do you change the resolution? Can't see to find the option in menus.
Rescale the window. I don't think there has been an update, it has some "user friendliness" issues taken from the Q2 variant it's based on. I don't think I will bother going into the code and recompile it with some fixes, even the author didn't seem interested in making it more user friendly and while it's a nice demo of path tracing there is a lot to be tweaked and such for it to look nice, run faster and have all features. You can increase the number of bounces to get better visuals but performance will plummet, plus you have to recompile Which on Windows is a pain the way the project is setup, you have to manually compile the shaders... eh. Too much work to do only to see how it will look with more bounces and some user friendliness fixes while it runs 10fps or something lol.

If I remember right it's based on Q2PRO. Hence all the menus and what not are different from OG Q2. Some settings don't work as they don't apply to VKPT and useful settings to set but mainly to keep set resolution are missing, you can set it in config but it gets ignored or overridden.
04-13-2019 08:47 AM
ThrashZone
Quote: Originally Posted by mouacyk View Post
How do you change the resolution? Can't see to find the option in menus.
Hi,
nvidia control panel maybe.
04-13-2019 08:43 AM
ZealotKi11er I am quite impressed by the performance 1080 Ti can give with no RTX. Want to now see what AMD can do without dedicated RTX. They do have FP16 like GTX Turing. They also have more Tflops in general.
04-13-2019 08:24 AM
mouacyk
Quote: Originally Posted by ChronoBodi View Post
i've tested quake 2 RTX on Titan X pascal, basically a 1080 ti.

its.... impressive for not having RT cores at all.

can do what feels to be 1080p, but fps rates of 30 to 45 fps.

1600x900 fairs a bit better, in the 50fps-55 rangeish or so.

and i find myself playing RTX quake 2 far more than i should, the lighting is so gorgeous.
How do you change the resolution? Can't see to find the option in menus.
04-13-2019 07:02 AM
ThrashZone Hi,
Kind of silly one has to be on 1903 to get features to stop additional updates from installing when ever ms feels the need too lol a little late at that point
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off