Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: please check this build and tell me if i can improve on anything Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-07-2019 02:49 PM
Ceadderman
Quote: Originally Posted by cybman View Post
"it really doesn't even need to be overclocked" lol your opinions are disregarded now but these are the current specs:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/dFsqtg


I get the idea of asking for feedback. What I don't get is the above attitude regarding the resulting feedback.

I's your dime, but I have to say I side in @TwoCables camp here. i7 9700k is a good CPU. But why spend that kind of money when i7 8700k will give you similar performance for less. Money that you could throw at your build elsewhere. Say @ the MB or the PSU?

Biostar has been out of the game for so long I won't even contemplate it. Sure it's probably a solid board but why? What features about that board cry out begging for purchase?

We had this talk about PSU. Rosewill is a respected brand for budget consumers but that Monitor you have in the list doesn't suggest "Budget".

Get what you want , it's your monies after all. But $45 could be better spent elsewhere for the ~15% gain you're getting from the i7-9700k.

~Ceadder
05-07-2019 01:04 AM
Cryptedvick
Quote: Originally Posted by TwoCables View Post
I think the 9700K is a waste of money. I really, really, really urge you to consider keeping the 8700K. Ask around if you don't want to only take my word for it (but you would be benefiting from the weeks of daily research I did on this).

Here's why I think you shouldn't buy the 9700K:

  • It doesn't have Hyper Threading (yet Intel calls it an i7?!). The 8700K has HT, and yes, some games do benefit from it.
  • It will result in having inconsistent frametimes (noticeable frametime spikes, resulting in gameplay that isn't always butter-smooth). In all the tests I have seen, the 8700K gives better frametime consistency. Frametime consistency is what makes games seem smoother.
  • For gaming, its performance is usually identical to the 8700K, and sometimes it's inferior due to the lack of Hyper Threading. The 9700K is never better by enough of a margin to even begin to justify the higher price.
  • It is much more expensive (I know I'm being redundant here, but this is something I feel is worth stressing)

Also consider what you're upgrading from.

Seriously, with how expensive the 9700K is, this wouldn't be a wise purchase. It doesn't offer anything over the 8700K to justify the much higher price.
I think TwoCables are making a good point here (intentional bad grammar XD), but regarding frametime, it's not as if a 9700k is gonna give you choppy gameplay. In some situations where the CPU is heavily utilized (say, AC Origins for instance) you may get slightly worse frametimes but not to the point where it would stress you out or you would actually notice it. The 9700k is a very strong CPU and overall, slightly better than the 8700k but it does not warrant the price difference, I agree. In some situations where multi threading is involved, the 8700k would be better. Say you have a bunch of tabs open in Chrome, straming active and you're playing AC Origins and you would notice the CPU hitting 100% and frametimes being a little inconsistent but I doubt you would actually notice choppy gameplay.

Say you were severely CPU bottlenecked, like running a 7600k with a 1080ti or 2080 or even 2070, then you would see what bad frametime due to CPU bottleneck looks like.

All in all, I also urge you to keep the 8700k. The only sane upgrade from that is the 9900k.
05-06-2019 11:43 PM
TwoCables
Quote: Originally Posted by cybman View Post
i have everything on that list besides 9700k but i can return any of it for refund and get something else
I think the 9700K is a waste of money. I really, really, really urge you to consider keeping the 8700K. Ask around if you don't want to only take my word for it (but you would be benefiting from the weeks of daily research I did on this).

Here's why I think you shouldn't buy the 9700K:

  • It doesn't have Hyper Threading (yet Intel calls it an i7?!). The 8700K has HT, and yes, some games do benefit from it.
  • It will result in having inconsistent frametimes (noticeable frametime spikes, resulting in gameplay that isn't always butter-smooth). In all the tests I have seen, the 8700K gives better frametime consistency. Frametime consistency is what makes games seem smoother.
  • For gaming, its performance is usually identical to the 8700K, and sometimes it's inferior due to the lack of Hyper Threading. The 9700K is never better by enough of a margin to even begin to justify the higher price.
  • It is much more expensive (I know I'm being redundant here, but this is something I feel is worth stressing)

Also consider what you're upgrading from.

Seriously, with how expensive the 9700K is, this wouldn't be a wise purchase. It doesn't offer anything over the 8700K to justify the much higher price.
05-06-2019 08:50 PM
cybman i have everything on that list besides 9700k but i can return any of it for refund and get something else
05-06-2019 08:49 PM
cybman
Quote: Originally Posted by TwoCables View Post
No, no, no.... what system do you own right now?
just this x220 laptop using external peripherals
05-06-2019 08:46 PM
TwoCables
Quote: Originally Posted by cybman View Post
"it really doesn't even need to be overclocked" lol your opinions are disregarded now but these are the current specs:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/dFsqtg
No, no, no.... what system do you own right now?
05-06-2019 08:26 PM
cybman "it really doesn't even need to be overclocked" lol your opinions are disregarded now but these are the current specs:
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/dFsqtg
05-06-2019 08:22 PM
TwoCables
Quote: Originally Posted by cybman View Post
i need criticism



i actually bought the 8700k and its still here in its box untouched but i changed my mind and i'm sending it back to amazon. the 9700k will be here tomorrow. my goal is for highest fps minimums possible while considering price/performance and i concluded that 9700k was worth it. its the slightly higher clock speed that does it for me + the fact that it will get better thermals being soldered which saves me from buying the deliding tool + liquid metal for eliminating the potential thermal bottleneck that the 9700k will already have removed (for the most part, this is my understanding) i need higher minimums because i intend to cap frame rate across the board with RTSS in order to eliminate frame time variance stuttering with a frame rate cap of like 100fps. if i'm ensuring that my minimums are kept as close as possible to this then i suppose thats the best i can do while using gsync so that i can get the smoothest gameplay at the lowest latency for my price/performance level.
k. It's your money. I think you should stay with the 8700K though. It has a lower price, it provides lower and more consistent frametimes, and it really doesn't even need to be overclocked. Then if you DO overclock it, you likely won't ever need to overclock it so high that you have to delid just to improve thermals.

Everything you just got done saying you want will be delivered by the 8700K, and then some.

What are your system's specs right now?
05-06-2019 07:30 PM
cybman i need criticism


Quote: Originally Posted by TwoCables View Post
Yes, that's what I found in my research when I was trying to decide between the 9600K, 8600K, 8700K, and 9700K. I haven't made any purchases yet (it's looking like I won't have enough money for several months now), but all my research points me to one inescapable conclusion: the 8700K should provide the best gaming performance and overclocking, and the price is much more reasonable.
i actually bought the 8700k and its still here in its box untouched but i changed my mind and i'm sending it back to amazon. the 9700k will be here tomorrow. my goal is for highest fps minimums possible while considering price/performance and i concluded that 9700k was worth it. its the slightly higher clock speed that does it for me + the fact that it will get better thermals being soldered which saves me from buying the deliding tool + liquid metal for eliminating the potential thermal bottleneck that the 9700k will already have removed (for the most part, this is my understanding) i need higher minimums because i intend to cap frame rate across the board with RTSS in order to eliminate frame time variance stuttering with a frame rate cap of like 100fps. if i'm ensuring that my minimums are kept as close as possible to this then i suppose thats the best i can do while using gsync so that i can get the smoothest gameplay at the lowest latency for my price/performance level.
05-06-2019 05:14 PM
TwoCables
Quote: Originally Posted by cybman View Post
i changed the 8700k for 9700k for the boost in minimums although i'm afraid that it may have higher frame time variance which produces stuttering
Yes, that's what I found in my research when I was trying to decide between the 9600K, 8600K, 8700K, and 9700K. I haven't made any purchases yet (it's looking like I won't have enough money for several months now), but all my research points me to one inescapable conclusion: the 8700K should provide the best gaming performance and overclocking, and the price is much more reasonable.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off