Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: 2400g vs 6700k @ 4Ghz - Zen 2 for future comparison Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-21-2019 07:31 AM
The Pook
Quote: Originally Posted by Redwoodz View Post
Isn't it amazing AMD can take a $140 processor and match an Intel $300 processor? Great job AMD!

/thread

Only 3 years late
05-21-2019 07:19 AM
Redwoodz Isn't it amazing AMD can take a $140 processor and match an Intel $300 processor? Great job AMD!

/thread
05-20-2019 08:19 PM
WannaBeOCer
Quote: Originally Posted by rdr09 View Post
Unfortunately, the same Hardware Fixes make these cpu more vulnerable to another type of exploit called - Fallout. It's never ending.
Ha thanks for pointing that out! Curious if the fixes in Cascade Lake addressed Fallout since it was delayed much longer than it should have due to mitigations.

Was reading the white pages on here regarding Fallout: https://mdsattacks.com/

Quote: Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post
Are the new 3200G/3400G Zen+? If so they would be interesting to test also.
That's what rumors are saying but I hope it's Zen 2 based. From every other reviewer testing Zen+ was only 3% faster than Zen core vs core.
05-20-2019 06:53 PM
ZealotKi11er Are the new 3200G/3400G Zen+? If so they would be interesting to test also.
05-20-2019 05:30 PM
WannaBeOCer
Quote: Originally Posted by ozlay View Post
The 2200g and 2400g use 4+0. Where as the 1200, 1300x, 1400, 1500x are all 2+2.

The 200ge, 220ge, 240ge are 2+0.
Thanks for responding, that's the reason why I bought the 2400g for testing.
05-20-2019 04:42 PM
ozlay The 2200g and 2400g use 4+0. Where as the 1200, 1300x, 1400, 1500x are all 2+2.

The 200ge, 220ge, 240ge are 2+0.
05-20-2019 03:59 PM
ZealotKi11er
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
That's correct the 2400G is based on 14nm(Zen)
Since its a APU. How are the CCXs configured? Is it just 4 or 2+2.
05-20-2019 02:57 PM
WannaBeOCer
Quote: Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post
2400G is not Zen+ right?
That's correct the 2400G is based on 14nm(Zen)
05-20-2019 02:48 PM
ZealotKi11er 2400G is not Zen+ right?
05-20-2019 02:00 PM
rdr09
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
Obviously if going the route of disabling Hyper Threading, the multi-threaded workloads will be even more impacted. I trust the sources I download my software from so I do not need to turn off hyper-threading. It's only those that don't trust the software mitigations that will disable HT. 8th and 9th gen already have hardware fixes for MDS.
Unfortunately, the same Hardware Fixes make these cpu more vulnerable to another type of exploit called - Fallout. It's never ending.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off