Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: [Tom's Hardware] Rumor Outlines Intel Comet Lake Features, Specifications, and Launch Window Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-29-2019 07:20 AM
reqq You think this 10 core will use mesh or ringbus?
08-12-2019 08:20 AM
Particle
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
PCI-e 4.0 has been out for quite some time on IBM's Power 9 boards since maybe around June of 2018.
While technically correct (the best kind of correct), the non-x86 enterprise market is esoteric enough to not really be relevant to the discussion I'd think.
08-09-2019 01:51 PM
WannaBeOCer
Quote: Originally Posted by skupples View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by guttheslayer View Post
By right the PCIe double the bandwidth, which mean u only need half the lane as usual. But I guess current market still don't see mass adaption to PCIe 4.0 devices.
didn't it just now hit market? like, this year, n on AMD's platform only.
PCI-e 4.0 has been out for quite some time on IBM's Power 9 boards since maybe around June of 2018.
08-08-2019 07:38 PM
skupples
Quote: Originally Posted by guttheslayer View Post
By right the PCIe double the bandwidth, which mean u only need half the lane as usual. But I guess current market still don't see mass adaption to PCIe 4.0 devices.
didn't it just now hit market? like, this year, n on AMD's platform only.
08-07-2019 08:28 PM
guttheslayer
Quote: Originally Posted by Asmodian View Post
It is actually the PCIe lanes that are the most important to me. If I had PCIe 4.0 devices it would be fine but I want my GPU, 40 GbE card, 900P, and 960 Pro to have their own lanes.
By right the PCIe double the bandwidth, which mean u only need half the lane as usual. But I guess current market still don't see mass adaption to PCIe 4.0 devices.
08-07-2019 11:49 AM
m4fox90
Quote: Originally Posted by WannaBeOCer View Post
Sounds like you need a work station. There are two platforms that already address this. ThreadRipper and Xeon-W.
Oh I don't really need any of it, I just like to play around inside my budget and time. The long-term trend should be increasing what's available to consumers within a given budget and we've been stuck on dual channel and 16 PCIe lanes for quite a while. Just as we've seen HEDT core counts come to mainstream, other features will follow. Just a matter of time.
08-07-2019 11:45 AM
WannaBeOCer
Quote: Originally Posted by m4fox90 View Post
Maybe if we're lucky, by 2030 we can have quad channel memory and plentiful PCIe lanes on all platforms
Sounds like you need a work station. There are two platforms that already address this. ThreadRipper and Xeon-W.
08-07-2019 11:32 AM
m4fox90 Maybe if we're lucky, by 2030 we can have quad channel memory and plentiful PCIe lanes on all platforms
08-06-2019 07:59 AM
skupples ^^ why i woefully regret going back to a 16 lane chip.
08-05-2019 06:29 PM
Asmodian
Quote: Originally Posted by guttheslayer View Post
If you aint picky about the 2 memory channel i think the R9 3950X would have been perfect for you.
It is actually the PCIe lanes that are the most important to me. If I had PCIe 4.0 devices it would be fine but I want my GPU, 40 GbE card, 900P, and 960 Pro to have their own lanes.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off