Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: Why are there no 32" 144HZ IPS monitors? Reply to Thread

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
09-12-2019 08:16 PM
JackCY There is only one from AUO in the whole list, with 240Hz and not a single monitor announced yet with that panel. Even the 27" variant is fairly delayed by now and was I think so far only in that Lenovo, no that was a TN.
So if they get panels manufactured low volume at Q1 2020, maybe some monitors with it will show up in stores in Q4 2020...
09-10-2019 11:36 PM
glenster They're coming soon:
09-10-2019 03:38 PM
JackCY Because 1080p is 4x easier to render than 2160p
I would gladly use 15.6" 4k OLED from a laptop But with that density the monitor better be a 31.2" 8k OLED. At least the GUI scaling in all OSes would finally make any sense.

27" 4k 200% scaling is a bit large and non integer scaling is often subpar.
09-10-2019 02:07 PM
deafboy Why do people have issues with 27" 4k but have no issues with 13" laptops or phones at 1080p?
09-07-2019 05:27 AM
karel88l I want 28"-29" QHD (non ultrawide).Probably will never happen.
09-06-2019 02:26 PM
Quote: Originally Posted by pewpewlazer View Post
Who actually WANTS a 27" 4k monitor?
People who like to wear these
09-06-2019 01:14 PM
Quote: Originally Posted by pewpewlazer View Post
Who actually WANTS a 27" 4k monitor?
I have a 28" 4k monitor for work... if the 27" was an option when I bought I likely would have gone with that, lol
09-06-2019 12:37 PM
Quote: Originally Posted by deafboy View Post
Because the market as a whole for high refresh rate high resolution monitors is super niche that it makes no sense to make one a couple inches bigger because a small handful of people might buy one

They're a business, they'll make whatever the market wants and will actually buy.
Who actually WANTS a 27" 4k monitor?
09-02-2019 07:33 PM
Quote: Originally Posted by aweir View Post
There are plenty of 27" IPS but not one 31.5" or 32" monitor. the highest is 75Hz. There are a plethora of 32" VA panels.

I was disappointed by the same. I had a 32" 2560x1600 (16:10) 60Hz IPS, then it broke and I had a 27" 1440p IPS, then I researched for my current Dell 27" 155Hz freesync TN, which is amazing, and TN has improved vastly from what I remember.

I could afford the cheapest 27" 4K 60Hz panels, or a high RR panel. And there's barely anything 32" and high RR anyways, and they are way over $1,000

There was a 32" VA panel I was close to getting, was that 144Hz? wow I am am so glad I got a fast panel.

The g-sync and F/s Dell's were cheap, and keep going on a great sale. I hope only the PSU fails, I can fix that, after warranty has gone.
09-02-2019 07:43 AM
animeowns they are coming in Q1 2020 if you just wait 4k @ 144hz 32 inch ips panels
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off