Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: Which is better 4x8gb or 2x16gb Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
09-12-2019 09:43 AM
JMattes Thank you all for the insight and advise!
09-12-2019 09:30 AM
ajlueke
Quote: Originally Posted by JMattes View Post
I don't know much about ram and how motherboards work when using ram. I know theres (4) slots, but I think theres dual channel and quad channel.. So I rather buy the right ram the first time them mess up and have chips not being utilized.

Upgrading RAM on my Media Server mother board is ASUS Prime-Z270-AR
https://www.asus.com/us/Motherboards/PRIME-Z270-AR/

Trying to figure you if I should get 4x8gb sticks or 2x16gb sticks.
I think the 2x16gb is the way to go.

Looking at the Ballistix Spot LT 3200mhz

I could buy one 16gb chip for now and upgrade to a second in the future, but I think ram is best in pairs?
On a bit of a buget, but if I have to buy the full 32gb now, I will.
As others have mentioned, it is best to buy RAM in a complete kit that has been tested to work together. As for which is better, 2X16GB or 4X8GB, theoretically they are the same. In both instances you have 2 ranks per channel, so your overall bandwidth should be identical. In practice, it may be a bit easier to overclock 2X16GB, since the two interleaved ranks on each channel are going over a single motherboard trace (socket). So there shouldn't be any variations like there could be when using two different sockets. I haven't actually seen it make much difference though.
09-12-2019 09:18 AM
TopM5
Quote: Originally Posted by JMattes View Post
So basically, 2 sticks over 4 sticks would be better as it offers less stress and may result in a higher OC for the system and better stability. But I can have 4 x 8gb sticks and they technically could preform the same as 2x16gb in stock environments.



Stupid Question:

Is there a huge draw back to just putting in 1x16gb for now and upgrading to a second when I get the money?
You can go with 1x16GB. Performance difference won't be noticeable daily life usage, because your memory is running at 3200Mhz (25.6GB/s bandwidth) .Though you may see slight performance difference in gaming. If you still want to get 4x8GB, go with it. There wont be performance difference between two vs four sticks. I guess you will not be manually overclocking it to 3200+. Enabling XMP will get it running at 3200mhz. Also check your motherboard manual, some allows you to use all 4 memory slots at full speed, but some motherboard limits speed to 2800mhz when 4 sticks are used.
09-12-2019 09:18 AM
JMattes
Quote: Originally Posted by ThrashZone View Post
Hi,
You didn't say what frequency is on the 2x8gb kit you already have yet.
Nor which 3200 either shoot for C14
https://benzhaomin.github.io/bdiefinder/
Currently I have only one Ballistix Sport LT 8gb 2666mhz stick.
Why I only bought one at the time for my machine IDK, was probably mining..
However getting a second 2666mhz stick is like $40.. which is nuts.
09-12-2019 09:06 AM
ThrashZone Hi,
You didn't say what frequency is on the 2x8gb kit you already have yet.
Nor which 3200 either shoot for C14
https://benzhaomin.github.io/bdiefinder/
09-12-2019 09:05 AM
skupples i think its more like, one side of the CPU is doing more work, because it can't split the task to both memory channels, so one memory channel is stuck doing all the lifting. Monitoring software may not properly discern this.

but yeah, feed it the standard. Also, what's your workload? 64gb isn't really a thing most folks chuck into their gaming or benchmark rigs.

don't make the mistake many many many of us have made, specially if your budget is tight. Don't buy into the extreme memory hype machine. 16gb is more than adequate for a general purpose PC. GP includes gaming, meme making, photoshop/other light Adobe products, crunching...

no need for 32gb+ unless you plan to do some actual heavy lifting.
09-12-2019 09:03 AM
The Pook like already said your platform only supports dual channel, using 4 sticks will still only give you dual channel

If your mobo uses daisy chain DIMM topology then filling all four DIMM slots is going to limit the clocks your RAM can reach.

If your board uses T-Toplogy then using 4 sticks shouldn't be an issue.

Though regardless if your mobo is T-Toplogy or Daisy Chain, dual rank DIMMs will always OC worse than single rank.
09-12-2019 08:53 AM
JMattes
Quote: Originally Posted by shilka View Post
Single channel going to be slower but how much slower depends on the work load and task
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
Wow that was nuts.. I mean HUGE difference in FPS.
It is also very odd that the 8gb used less GPU, but more CPU.. didnt make sense.
09-12-2019 08:40 AM
ThrashZone Hi,
Buy in packs
If you want 16gb sticks get a 2x16gb kit
Later you can try another 2x16 kit

Never buy one stick and expect to match it later that makes no sense
Stick with 2x8gb if the budget is that limited.
09-12-2019 08:39 AM
shilka Single channel going to be slower but how much slower depends on the work load and task
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off