Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: 4 GBs x 8 VS 8 GB x 4 [Quad Channel] Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
10-22-2019 03:20 AM
XLifted
Quote: Originally Posted by TopM5 View Post
On a single CPU motherboard (x99 / x299 / amd x399) both will run in quad channel, so no performance difference at all. If you're running a dual CPU server (C602/C612), then 8 sticks will run in octa channel or say dual quad channel.
Makes sense. It will be x99 in single CPU set up.
I thought maybe 8 GBs would provide higher buffer, before it overflows into another bank of memory, granted it's not exactly how it works, since it pings all channels, but thought maybe 8 gb sticks provide better buffer, since it doesn't get "full" right away before switching to another banks.

I don't know exactly how the information flows from bank to bank though

I also thought in another scenario maybe 4 gb sticks would be better since it has less ram per bank.

I know it's not HDD, but 7200 rpm 3 TB HDD will be slower than 7200 rpm 1 TB, because it has smaller surface distance on the platter to scan.

RAM structure is a bit of mystery to me.

Until this year, I had no idea that if you put 8 / 4 / 8 / 4 and 4 / 8 / 4 / 8 gb sticks into the set up, it will still run in quad channel. I read it in HP workstation manual, and kind of shrugged it off, and then actually tried it in Lenovo S30, and also saw same set up in HP z420, mismatched ram sizes, but still running in QUAD channel.

I also noticed that mismatched config per channel ran better than just 8 gbs x 4 sticks.

The more you know
10-22-2019 02:36 AM
TopM5 On a single CPU motherboard (x99 / x299 / amd x399) both will run in quad channel, so no performance difference at all. If you're running a dual CPU server (C602/C612), then 8 sticks will run in octa channel or say dual quad channel.
10-22-2019 02:34 AM
XLifted
4 GBs x 8 VS 8 GB x 4 [Quad Channel]

Is there downsides of running 4 GB sticks in 8 slot config, versus 8 GB sticks in 4 slots for quad channel?

I know memory controller will work harder with 8 slot config, but actual performance in games or rendering?
Does it change anything, when you still have 32 GBs of ram.

I can't find a definite answer in any of my google searches.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off