Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community (https://www.overclock.net/forum/)
-   Monitors and Displays (https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-monitors-displays/)
-   -   Alienware 55 inch Oled Monitor $3999 September 30th Release Date (https://www.overclock.net/forum/44-monitors-displays/1731794-alienware-55-inch-oled-monitor-3999-september-30th-release-date.html)

animeowns 08-19-2019 08:54 PM

Alienware 55 inch Oled Monitor $3999 September 30th Release Date
 
https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/19/2...e-date-pricing

I am glad I didn't wait for this monitor now with dp 1.2 and no HDR support in sight but at least it has the fast response time and freesync support.

Update: Dell has gotten back to us, confirming that their original spec sheet was wrong, and that the monitor comes with DisplayPort 1.4 rather than 1.2. So the display does in fact have enough bandwidth for [email protected] with 8bpc color.

CallsignVega 08-19-2019 11:45 PM

There is all sorts of things wrong with this launch.

The original spec sheet is wrong, it does have DP 1.4 (which is needed for 4K/120).

No HDR I think is some lame attempt to keep the panel wear down/burn in potential down for demanding PC use.

The response time listing of 0.5ms GTG is nonsensical, since there is no such thing as G2G when testing the speed of an OLED panel. Not to mention LG OLED panel pixel response is sub 0.1ms per the manufacturer.

Basically they are just filling the gap between now and when HDMI 2.1 video cards hit. For a $2500 price premium considering you can get a 55" C9 OLED for $1500. Come those HDMI 2.1 video cards, the C9 *may* be better because of the superior native HDR. I say *may* because we don't know if NVIDIA will allow VRR over HDMI 2.1 yet. If they don't, the Alienware will actually be the better choice since it has VRR.

ToTheSun! 08-20-2019 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CallsignVega (Post 28095314)
The response time listing of 0.5ms GTG is nonsensical, since there is no such thing as G2G when testing the speed of an OLED panel. Not to mention LG OLED panel pixel response is sub 0.1ms per the manufacturer.

To be fair, RTINGS measured OLED panels in LG and Sony TV's having around 0.2ms average for 80% transitions and up to around 2ms average for 100% transitions. It's entirely possible that, if measuring for something like, say, 90% transitions, 0.5ms would be a pretty accurate number.

Yukon Trooper 08-20-2019 10:42 AM

I hope Nvidia/ATI release an HDMI-VRR driver to spite Dell and that ridiculous launch price.

airisom2 08-20-2019 10:54 AM

Well, I wanted one, but not at that price. Lack of HDR is a bummer too. Maybe they'll release an HDR firmware to requesting customers at the cost of their warranty hehe.

But the good news is that we'll get 4k 120Hz oled this year. Better news is that we'll get it next year even cheaper when HDMI 2.1 cards are released and LG C9s are on closeout. 2020 oleds will be better at lower prices too.

CallsignVega 08-20-2019 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToTheSun! (Post 28095578)
To be fair, RTINGS measured OLED panels in LG and Sony TV's having around 0.2ms average for 80% transitions and up to around 2ms average for 100% transitions. It's entirely possible that, if measuring for something like, say, 90% transitions, 0.5ms would be a pretty accurate number.

I'm not convinced RTINGS has the equipment good enough to evaluate such speed. This Blurbusters article has 0.1ms:

https://www.blurbusters.com/high-spe...les-at-960fps/

ToTheSun! 08-20-2019 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CallsignVega (Post 28096230)
I'm not convinced RTINGS has the equipment good enough to evaluate such speed. This Blurbusters article has 0.1ms:

https://www.blurbusters.com/high-spe...les-at-960fps/

Unless I'm mistaken, they recorded AMOLED, not LG's WRGB OLED. But, regardless of panel type, how did they reach the 0.1ms measurement? I'm not seeing anything regarding that. Individual frame analysis of a 960 FPS video would only allow the viewer to infer values closer to 1ms, not distinguish between sub-milisecond response times.

Even then, after watching the video, I could still see remnants (very faint ghosts) from previous frames in new ones. At 0.1ms response times, it would be impossible to see ghosting between 2 or more frames of the video.

CallsignVega 08-21-2019 01:43 AM

Shouldn't matter on the OLED version. Even with "only" 960 fps you can still see the very tiny fade wipe in the video, which blurbusters was referencing.

Every topic I've ever read on OLED has it substantially faster than 0.5ms. LG themselves claim "1,000" times faster than LCD, which would easily put it sub 0.1ms.

https://www.oled-info.com/lg-55em9700

http://www.displaymate.com/LG_OLED_TV_ShootOut_1.htm

https://depts.washington.edu/cmditr/...why_oleds.html

I'm just saying I am not totally sold on RTINGS testing method fort such a fast display. 2ms is an eternity for an emissive display. It would be interesting if someone like TFTCentral did some tests.

ToTheSun! 08-21-2019 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CallsignVega (Post 28096860)
I'm just saying I am not totally sold on RTINGS testing method fort such a fast display. 2ms is an eternity for an emissive display. It would be interesting if someone like TFTCentral did some tests.

I suppose. Short of believing LG's own material (which would still be pretty inconsequential, given that, regardless, OLED is fast enough, anyway), a second independent source would help prove or disprove RTINGS' measurements.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.