Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community - Reply to Topic

Thread: ROG Crosshair VII overclocking thread Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-22-2019 06:11 PM
Xenozx im on 2606 and when I change my core voltage from AUTO or MANUAL to - (negative) OFFSET and do 0.025 or 0.05 the core voltage goes from auto of 1.45 to 1.1 or less? Obviously thats why too low, and it didnt do this on older bios, any idea why 0.05 or any # really, drops it so low? I am not fat fingering and missing the .0 either.
08-22-2019 01:20 PM
Xenozx
Quote: Originally Posted by Duvar View Post
If CPU is stuck @ 3.8GHz or another Clockspeed, try enabling Core Performance Boost in the BIOS.
i have this issue. Its stuck at 3.8 no matter what, until i open ryzen master and enable the media profiel, then it will jump up to 4.3 in cpu-z.
08-22-2019 01:07 PM
Yoizhik latest stable bios is 2606, right?
08-22-2019 11:16 AM
Duvar
Quote: Originally Posted by Mandarb View Post
Anyone tried 2606? It didn't boost for me and the CPU was stuck at 3.8GHz. Anyone else seen this behaviour?
If CPU is stuck @ 3.8GHz or another Clockspeed, try enabling Core Performance Boost in the BIOS.
08-22-2019 09:30 AM
Mandarb Anyone tried 2606? It didn't boost for me and the CPU was stuck at 3.8GHz. Anyone else seen this behaviour?
08-22-2019 08:08 AM
gupsterg
Quote: Originally Posted by jaygau View Post
We could debate a lot about that. I don't think this millisecond spark at 76C that HWinfo shows to you while your average temp during the display cycle was actually 65C is really representative of the reality. If AMD switched to average it's because they think it's a far better representation of the chip real temperature and I think they are right.
You may wish to read this post.
08-22-2019 08:06 AM
nick name
Quote: Originally Posted by oreonutz View Post
-snip-

You still want some Cookies my brother? What kind do you want??? LOL!
Whoa there, Google. Calm down with the cookies. Lol.

Thank you, but you save up for that new 3950X.
08-22-2019 07:44 AM
jaygau
Quote: Originally Posted by oreonutz View Post
Tdie in Hwinfo is the most reliable. AMD Switched to an Average Temp, so while it gives you a good overview of your Average temp, it is not realtime data, like HWinfo tdie is.
We could debate a lot about that. I don't think this millisecond spark at 76C that HWinfo shows to you while your average temp during the display cycle was actually 65C is really representative of the reality. If AMD switched to average it's because they think it's a far better representation of the chip real temperature and I think they are right.
08-22-2019 04:50 AM
chakku
Quote: Originally Posted by harderthanfire View Post
That's only if you go too far. You can get better boost and much better benchmark results with a negative offset compared to regular PBO or boost due to the better thermals but the amount you can offset is pure luck.


I can manage -0.1V and be rock solid stable, most others seem to manage -0.85, -0.75 or even -0.50.


Per CCX overclocking still had the best overall performance for me but until the AsusWMI bug is fixed I don't want to run that.
It's not about stability, the system will appear fine and stable and boost clocks look to be increased but performance will decrease because monitoring software won't pick up the throttling going on in the CPU. From what has been reported on negative offset voltages any benefits appear to drop off beyond -0.025V to -0.05V and anything beyond results in worse performance/benchmarks. Only way to confirm it is with benchmark numbers as clock readings go out the window when you're limiting voltage to the CPU.
08-22-2019 12:40 AM
hurricane28
Quote: Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
I have put my comment beneath that YT video.
Awesome comment Mumak. I just felt the need to show you and others what Assus is on about.. I simple don't like it when they BS around good questions and simply lying about and towards us and ever Reviewers.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off