ROG Crosshair VII overclocking thread - Page 867 - Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community

Forum Jump: 

ROG Crosshair VII overclocking thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #8661 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-21-2019, 10:27 PM
Tech Enthusiast
 
oreonutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 506
Rep: 41 (Unique: 24)
Quote: Originally Posted by Baio73 View Post
Am I blind or I can't see the URL for partecipating to the test?

Baio

Interesting…

I got 6/8 cores hitting 4.392MHz max boost with AMD Ryzen Balanced power plan
4/8 cores hitting 4.342MHz max boos with AMD Ryzen High Perfromance power plan

Second try on Balanced, 4.392MHz but only 4/8 cores.

BIOS 2501

Drivers/BIOS must have some problem…

Baio
Hey brother, want to make sure you saw the link for entering. Its: https://forms.gle/ii4Vfgnktzxr12uZA

-MattTheTech

Offical Ryzen 9 3900x Owner!
DodekaZen3000
(28 items)
CPU
Ryzen 9 3900x
Motherboard
ASUS Crosshair VII Hero
GPU
EVGA 1080ti FTW3 Hybrid
RAM
G.SKILL Flare X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) 3200Mhz (PC4 25600) - F4-3200C14D-16GFX (x2 Kits)
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 Evo 1TB
Hard Drive
Samsung 850/860 Evo (x3 Raid 0 Game Drive)
Hard Drive
WD Black 4TB (x2 Raid 0 Storage Drive)
Hard Drive
860 Evo
Optical Drive
LG Blu-Ray Burner (Model BH16NS40)
Optical Drive
5.25" to One 3.5" and One 2.25" Bay (Model Syba SY-MRA55006)
Power Supply
Corsair RM1000i
Cooling
EKWB Phoenix 360mm Modular Cooler
Case
Old Jonesbo Case
Operating System
Windows 10 Enterprise
Monitor
Samsung NU8000 55Inch TV (Its a 4k TV But I run in it 1440p 120hz)
Monitor
LG 1080p 34 Inch Diplay
Keyboard
Corsair k70 RGB Lux Mk2
Mouse
Logitech G700s
Mousepad
Razer Vespula V2
Audio
Custom Built 7.1 Surround System
Audio
HT-Omega eClaro 7.1 Sound Card
Audio
Focusrite Scarlett 18i20
Other
Aquantia 10Gb NIC
Other
LSI 9211-8i
Other
Oculus Rift HMD
Other
10 ML120 + 2 ML140 Corsair Maglev Fans
Other
Phanteks Halo aRGB LUX x5
▲ hide details ▲
oreonutz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #8662 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-21-2019, 11:27 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 65
Rep: 2 (Unique: 2)
Quote: Originally Posted by chakku View Post
Have you confirmed an actual performance boost? Recorded max clocks will increase when you limit voltage on the CPUs because of clock stretching.

That's only if you go too far. You can get better boost and much better benchmark results with a negative offset compared to regular PBO or boost due to the better thermals but the amount you can offset is pure luck.


I can manage -0.1V and be rock solid stable, most others seem to manage -0.85, -0.75 or even -0.50.


Per CCX overclocking still had the best overall performance for me but until the AsusWMI bug is fixed I don't want to run that.
harderthanfire is offline  
post #8663 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 12:34 AM
Overclocker
 
hurricane28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 6,910
Rep: 155 (Unique: 92)
Quote: Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
ASUS wasn't aware that the ITE chip is such a crap, they realized it too late when design was finished long ago and production ongoing.
It took them long enough though, they use this similar chip for over 5 years now. My 990FX Sabertooth had the same chip, perhaps slightly different but it had the same issues.

Hopefully they never use this crap again. But then again, these chips are very cheap too. You can buy 15 of them for a couple of bucks..

Nevertheless, i haven't got this fan speed or any other problem when monitoring from this chip happening on my CH7, Good job Mumak, you're the best.

hurricane
(13 items)
CPU
AMD RYZEN 2600x
Motherboard
Asus Crosshair hero 7
GPU
MSI GTX 970 gaming 4G
RAM
G.Skill F4-3200C14D-16GFX
Hard Drive
Samsung 950 pro, 256 GB
Power Supply
Cooler Master V850
Cooling
Alphacool Eisbaer 360
Case
Phanteks Enthoo Luxe tempered glass
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Asus VG248Q
Keyboard
Logitech G910
Mouse
Logitech G900
Audio
logitech Z-2300
▲ hide details ▲
hurricane28 is offline  
post #8664 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 12:40 AM
Overclocker
 
hurricane28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 6,910
Rep: 155 (Unique: 92)
Quote: Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
I have put my comment beneath that YT video.
Awesome comment Mumak. I just felt the need to show you and others what Assus is on about.. I simple don't like it when they BS around good questions and simply lying about and towards us and ever Reviewers.

hurricane
(13 items)
CPU
AMD RYZEN 2600x
Motherboard
Asus Crosshair hero 7
GPU
MSI GTX 970 gaming 4G
RAM
G.Skill F4-3200C14D-16GFX
Hard Drive
Samsung 950 pro, 256 GB
Power Supply
Cooler Master V850
Cooling
Alphacool Eisbaer 360
Case
Phanteks Enthoo Luxe tempered glass
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro
Monitor
Asus VG248Q
Keyboard
Logitech G910
Mouse
Logitech G900
Audio
logitech Z-2300
▲ hide details ▲
hurricane28 is offline  
post #8665 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 04:50 AM
Realist
 
chakku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 372
Rep: 3 (Unique: 3)
Quote: Originally Posted by harderthanfire View Post
That's only if you go too far. You can get better boost and much better benchmark results with a negative offset compared to regular PBO or boost due to the better thermals but the amount you can offset is pure luck.


I can manage -0.1V and be rock solid stable, most others seem to manage -0.85, -0.75 or even -0.50.


Per CCX overclocking still had the best overall performance for me but until the AsusWMI bug is fixed I don't want to run that.
It's not about stability, the system will appear fine and stable and boost clocks look to be increased but performance will decrease because monitoring software won't pick up the throttling going on in the CPU. From what has been reported on negative offset voltages any benefits appear to drop off beyond -0.025V to -0.05V and anything beyond results in worse performance/benchmarks. Only way to confirm it is with benchmark numbers as clock readings go out the window when you're limiting voltage to the CPU.

PC
(19 items)
CPU
AMD Ryzen R7 3700X
Motherboard
ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero (Wi-Fi)
GPU
ASUS ROG Strix GTX 1080 Ti OC
RAM
G.Skill Ripjaws V F4-3200C14D-32GVK
Hard Drive
Samsung 970 Pro 512GB NVMe
Hard Drive
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
Hard Drive
STOREMI (Intel 730 Series 240GB + Hitachi Ultrastar 7K4000 4TB)
Power Supply
EVGA SuperNOVA 850 P2
Cooling
Noctua NH D15 SE-AM4
Case
Phanteks Enthoo Evolv X Satin Black
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro 1809 64-bit
Monitor
Dell P2715Q
Monitor
Dell P2715Q
Keyboard
Topre Realforce 87U 55g Uniform (Norbaforce/BT-500 Bluetooth)
Mouse
Logitech G Pro Wireless
Mousepad
Artisan Hayate Kou
Audio
Benchmark DAC2 HGC
Audio
JBL LSR305
Audio
Sennheiser HD6XX
▲ hide details ▲
chakku is offline  
post #8666 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 07:44 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1
Rep: 0
Quote: Originally Posted by oreonutz View Post
Tdie in Hwinfo is the most reliable. AMD Switched to an Average Temp, so while it gives you a good overview of your Average temp, it is not realtime data, like HWinfo tdie is.
We could debate a lot about that. I don't think this millisecond spark at 76C that HWinfo shows to you while your average temp during the display cycle was actually 65C is really representative of the reality. If AMD switched to average it's because they think it's a far better representation of the chip real temperature and I think they are right.

Last edited by jaygau; 08-22-2019 at 07:50 AM.
jaygau is offline  
post #8667 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 08:06 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,413
Rep: 17 (Unique: 9)
Quote: Originally Posted by oreonutz View Post
-snip-

You still want some Cookies my brother? What kind do you want??? LOL!
Whoa there, Google. Calm down with the cookies. Lol.

Thank you, but you save up for that new 3950X.

AMD Ryzen 2700X  |  Fractal Design S36 360 AIO w/6 Corsair SP120L fans  |  Asus Crosshair VII WiFi X470  | G.SKILL TridentZ 3636MHz @ 14-15-14-28 2x8GB  | EVGA 1070 Ti SC GAMING ACX 3.0 Black  |  Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe 500GB - Boot Drive  |  Samsung 850 EVO SSD 1TB - Game Drive  |  Seagate 1TB HDD - Media Drive  |  EVGA 650 G3  | Thermaltake Core P3 Case |
nick name is offline  
post #8668 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 08:08 AM
Meddling user
 
gupsterg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lurking over a keyboard
Posts: 7,160
Rep: 774 (Unique: 354)
Quote: Originally Posted by jaygau View Post
We could debate a lot about that. I don't think this millisecond spark at 76C that HWinfo shows to you while your average temp during the display cycle was actually 65C is really representative of the reality. If AMD switched to average it's because they think it's a far better representation of the chip real temperature and I think they are right.
You may wish to read this post.
gupsterg is offline  
post #8669 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 09:30 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Mandarb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 197
Rep: 5 (Unique: 4)
Anyone tried 2606? It didn't boost for me and the CPU was stuck at 3.8GHz. Anyone else seen this behaviour?
Mandarb is offline  
post #8670 of 9858 (permalink) Old 08-22-2019, 11:16 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Duvar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 133
Rep: 4 (Unique: 4)
Quote: Originally Posted by Mandarb View Post
Anyone tried 2606? It didn't boost for me and the CPU was stuck at 3.8GHz. Anyone else seen this behaviour?
If CPU is stuck @ 3.8GHz or another Clockspeed, try enabling Core Performance Boost in the BIOS.
Duvar is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Overclock.net - An Overclocking Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off