Overclock.net banner

1 - 20 of 20 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
156 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Hi, all! Since Kaby Lake, the good-average chip will do 5ghz at 1.35vcore under load benchmark stable. Does anyone here own a 10900k that requires more than that? Not necessarily for p95 avx stability or something excessive.
The worst 8700k and 9900k I ever saw was something like 4.9ghz 1.45v just for benchmark stability.
 

·
Overclocker in training
Joined
·
14,315 Posts
Hi,
Most will do at least 5.2 with less vcore voltage than 1.35v.
VID is another thing though lol that can be over 1.4v
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
753 Posts
FYI
 

Attachments

  • Rep+
Reactions: ThrashZone

·
Facepalm
Joined
·
9,870 Posts
Hi, all! Since Kaby Lake, the good-average chip will do 5ghz at 1.35v benchmark stable. Does anyone here own a 10900k that requires more than that? Not necessarily for p95 avx stability or something excessive.
Please state whether this 1.35v is BIOS SET VOLTAGE or load measured voltage please. Because the voltages for 10th gen chips seem to be just better than previous. Even 10700k's are on average doing better than the average non KS 9900k's were.

Because for example a 9900k that requires 1.35v LOAD VR VOUT at 5 ghz is horribly completely awful. And 1.35v set in BIOS means nothing without knowing what loadline calibration level and motherboard was tested.

And I have yet to see a single 10900k that needs 1.35v load voltage for 5 ghz. Zero. Even the worst SP63 chips don't need that much when trying to run small FFT AVX prime95!
I think the worst 10900k I saw needed like 1.240v for 5 ghz and 1.29v for 5.1 ghz, full load (AVX disabled prime95).

I don't even think there are any 10700k's that need anything too close to 1.35v load for 5 ghz, but plenty that are struggling to reach 5.1.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,206 Posts
^^^^^^ Legend
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
125 Posts
5.0 cache 4.7 AC/DC load line 1/1 iddle voltage 1.315
5.2 cache 4.7 iddle voltage 1.435

MSI Z490 Unify
CPU batch x015e217

Im Winner here I think :D
At last IMC isnt bad. 2x16 can do 4600MHz cl17 flat. Maybe higher but mainboard bios limitation.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,553 Posts
Just booted my 10700k for the first time, set memory to 4266 XMP and CPU multiplier to 51. Voltage is 1.2v. Prime 95 small fft currently running for a 5 minutes and all cores still at 100%. I might have hit the mega millions. Let’s see how high I can push it!

Edit: Now 5.2 @ 1.3v, but one of the cores is getting to 93 C.
 

·
Facepalm
Joined
·
9,870 Posts
Just booted my 10700k for the first time, set memory to 4266 XMP and CPU multiplier to 51. Voltage is 1.2v. Prime 95 small fft currently running for a 5 minutes and all cores still at 100%. I might have hit the mega millions. Let’s see how high I can push it!

Edit: Now 5.2 @ 1.3v, but one of the cores is getting to 93 C.
What's the load voltage?
Are those voltages you are given what you set in the BIOS or at full load? If they are what you set in the BIOS, we need your loadline calibration level, (motherboard will help) and voltage at full load. If the newest beta of HWinfo64 shows VR VOUT on your board, that is even better.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,553 Posts
What's the load voltage?
Are those voltages you are given what you set in the BIOS or at full load? If they are what you set in the BIOS, we need your loadline calibration level, (motherboard will help) and voltage at full load. If the newest beta of HWinfo64 shows VR VOUT on your board, that is even better.
That's just what I set it to in the bios. Actual voltage is about 0.013V higher than what I set it to. I don't mean to hijack this thread, so can you please help me get the most of this thing in the 10700k thread? You seem to know alot about CPU overclocking and I have some updated results over there.
 

·
Flight Sim Enthusiast
Joined
·
330 Posts
I don't even think there are any 10700k's that need anything too close to 1.35v load for 5 ghz, but plenty that are struggling to reach 5.1.
My 10700k is stable at 5ghz at just shy of 1.3v under load, but produces temps that at times are over 90c. 5.1 is stupidly doable for me, but any serious load thermal throttles under my out-classed at this level NH-D15S.
 

·
Flight Sim Enthusiast
Joined
·
330 Posts
HA...I could make identical pics, that's the same SP rating as my 10700k, also from Vietnam. My take: getting an extra 100 or 200 hz of clock is more of a mind game than something I'll really notice when using my computer.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,553 Posts
HA...I could make identical pics, that's the same SP rating as my 10700k, also from Vietnam. My take: getting an extra 100 or 200 hz of clock is more of a mind game than something I'll really notice when using my computer.
My 10700K was made in Vietnam and it clocks really well, so that can’t be it. All I did was set the multiplier to 52 and CPU voltage to 1.3 and it runs at 5.2 all core at 1.31 vcore. Temps are in the high 80s to low 90s in Prime95 small ffts.
 

·
Flight Sim Enthusiast
Joined
·
330 Posts
Well, seems my invitation to the 10700k loser's club has finally arrived. All my recent attempts to lock down a fully stable all core, 16 thread 5.0Ghz OC have failed: my NH-D15S just can't handle the temps generated by the load voltage needed to pass muster on being rock solid stable, not to mention my discomfort with the voltage needed. I don't blame my cooler, though I could. I could "fake it", but why bother for my 4.9Ghz, cache at 4.6Ghz, OC passes muster with complete comfort, as has 5.0/4.7 with HT disabled. At least my g.skill 2x16 3600 15-15-15-32 2T sticks are helping things out here @1.37v (though this is far from something to brag about).

Update: More details. 5.0 stable (if you want to call it that) takes a 1.39v manual voltage setting, (impolite phrase with words F and S removed)! An OCCT load averages about 1.3v, AVX loads average about 1.27v. OCCT and things like Blender, Cinebench, AIDA stress (full and fpu) demonstrate stability with temps from mid 70c up to the occasional mid 90c for OCCT linpack @ 222w. Prime95 AVX anything overwhelms my cooler and thermal throttles within two minutes. All these temps are reduced 10c when running at my 4.9 OC.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
768 Posts
My 10850K requires 1.47V VID which translates to LLCd 1.32V for 5Ghz all cores with HT.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
149 Posts
My 10900k at 5Ghz on all cores vcore voltage at bios 1.25, LLC level 3, when stress testing vid voltage is 1.275. ran aida64, occt , for 1 hour max temp was 78c, cinebench r23 for 30 mins same temps no errors i think this is good on aircool
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Please state whether this 1.35v is BIOS SET VOLTAGE or load measured voltage please. Because the voltages for 10th gen chips seem to be just better than previous. Even 10700k's are on average doing better than the average non KS 9900k's were.

Because for example a 9900k that requires 1.35v LOAD VR VOUT at 5 ghz is horribly completely awful. And 1.35v set in BIOS means nothing without knowing what loadline calibration level and motherboard was tested.

And I have yet to see a single 10900k that needs 1.35v load voltage for 5 ghz. Zero. Even the worst SP63 chips don't need that much when trying to run small FFT AVX prime95!
I think the worst 10900k I saw needed like 1.240v for 5 ghz and 1.29v for 5.1 ghz, full load (AVX disabled prime95).

I don't even think there are any 10700k's that need anything too close to 1.35v load for 5 ghz, but plenty that are struggling to reach 5.1.
Well my 10900K SP63 seems to need high voltage! :( I have been messing with this for months...

Right now im testing LLC6 @ 1.3v for 5Ghz .... When looking at SVID its 1.295-1.300v when I run LLC5. Im pretty jaloux on those who can run 1.25-1.27v bios.

But with the 1.3v im running you cannot touch cache etc. Then it wants more voltage 1.31 maybe.. so I guess my cpu sucks.

But been having a lot of issues with cache L0 error WHEA and Hardware failure in Linpack Xtreme. My cpu is actually so bad it can not even run XMP 3600. With a lot of tweaks 3500 Mhz was the highest and some time still stability issues in stress. So now im running 3333 Mhz 14-14-14-34.

So when you say many can run 5 ghz at 1.24v its sound impossible? Is this then LLC7 or other tweaks?! is it boot to desktop voltage? I always test Linpack Xtreme which is pretty heavy.

But I both love my 10900K and hate it at the same time for being the worst tier bin possible... Just lucky me as always.
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
Top