Originally Posted by ChrisB17 ![]() http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-412-_-Product This IMO. |
Originally Posted by Dopamin3 ![]() Definitely this because of the price decrease. inb4 chrisb bashes DFI. The DFI will have a Lotes socket, that picture is from a very early model. And about Gigabyte, they use Foxconn sockets but put a Lotes cover on, making it appear like they are using Lotes when they are not. Shady marketing. Also when you enable USB3.0, it drops your PCIe lane down to x8, which is plain stupid. |
Overclocking Overclocking the LANParty DK P55-T3eH9 was not the treat I was expecting. I was unable to get even close to the max OC that I have run on the i5 750 that I have been using. It is capable of running at 4.3-4.4 stable, yet on the T3eH9 we only saw 4.214GHz; this was at 210x20. There was (oddly enough) no direct option for turning turbo mode on or off. This could be the reason that my higher overclocks failed as the turbo mode on the Core i5 and i7 can cause instabilities during overclocking when left on. |
Originally Posted by Dopamin3 ![]() Definitely this because of the price decrease. inb4 chrisb bashes DFI. The DFI will have a Lotes socket, that picture is from a very early model. And about Gigabyte, they use Foxconn sockets but put a Lotes cover on, making it appear like they are using Lotes when they are not. Shady marketing. Also when you enable USB3.0, it drops your PCIe lane down to x8, which is plain stupid. |
Originally Posted by sean11978 ![]() dude thank you soo much for showing me this board i didnt see that earlier +1 to another dfi fan XD |
Okay, we have to say that for a DFI LANParty board we were a little disappointed with the results that we saw from the DK P55-T3eH9. While we admit we did not get to spend a large amount of time on overclocking, we still feel that as an “Overclock Edition†DFI board we should have been able to get a much higher clock than we did. |