Overclock.net banner
1 - 20 of 82 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
13,796 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
There are still some people that believe that 30 fps is the maximum limitation of the human eye. This is not true at all. The eye does not see in frames per second.

Tweakguides had a good article explaining frame rates: http://www.tweakguides.com/Graphics_5.html
Quote:
Maximum FPS

The concept that there is a maximum possible FPS beyond which the human eye can't distinguish any real difference is not entirely accurate. For more details, see this article and this article among the many which refute this claim. In particular the common claim that "The human eye can't see more than 24 (or 25 or 30 or 60) FPS" is completely false, and is partly borne of the misconception that TV or movie FPS is the same as PC game FPS, and partly possibly borne out of a need to justify lower framerates.

Click to enlarge Click to enlarge

It's true that movies and TV only use around 24, 25 or 30 FPS, depending on which part of the world you're in. But there are three important differences between Movies, TV and PC games:

1. Movies and TV use Motion Blur, so that if at any time you freeze a movie scene on your DVD player for example, a large part of the scene may consist of blurred objects. Furthermore, the images in a movie or on TV do not have crisp detailed outlines. In a PC game on the other hand, if you take a screenshot or pause the game at any time, you will notice that everything is usually extremely sharp and distinct regardless of how fast it was moving when the shot was taken. Take a look at the screenshot comparison above: on the left is a fast motion shot of an alien from the movie Alien vs. Predator, on the right a fast motion shot of an alien from the old game Alien vs. Predator 2. Thus 24 often-blurred frames from a movie wind up looking much smoother to the human eye than 24 or even 30 distinct frames from a fast-moving PC game. So why can't games use motion blur? Well indeed most recent games have started incorporating blur effects. This can definitely help to reduce the visible impact of lower framerates, but aside from the fact that not all games have motion blur, the next point addresses why this doesn't always work. Even with motion blur, the graphics in PC games may still have very sharp outlines which only settings like Antialiasing can smooth out, but ironically this usually come at the expense of further lowering FPS.

2. Control responsiveness steps in again to further differentiate between a movie and a game. In a movie or TV show, the viewpoint is not under your control; it is typically a static or smoothly panning camera. In a game however, your control over the viewpoint means that in a rapidly moving gaming at 24 or even 30FPS you will notice the general choppiness due to a lack of responsiveness. The variability of control responsiveness based on variable framerate also helps highlight the next point below.

3. PC games do not have a rock-solid unchanging framerate, while TV and movies do. While some games have a framerate cap of 30 or 60 FPS, very few if any PC games can be locked down to consistently show exactly 24 or 30 FPS - their FPS will vary, sometimes significantly. Movies and TV on the other hand always show exactly the same number of frames per second and do not vary one bit. Therefore the variability in framerate in games also works to exaggerate the impact of lower framerates, making them more noticeable. In Crysis for example, if you walk out of an indoor area which has 60 FPS into a outdoor area with 25 FPS, you will notice the difference, partly due to a change in control responsiveness, and partly because your eyes detect the relative change in framerate.
There is a program called FPS Compare that lets you runs 30 fps and 60 fps in a split screen.

http://www.mediafire.com/?q3152228e1ilwjf
Quote:
One way to demonstrate that the human eye can actually detect differences above 30FPS is to use a small program called FPS Compare (11KB) by Andreas Gustafsson (used here with his permission). To use it, simply extract and launch the FPSCompare.exe file. Make sure to read the instructions in the Readme.txt file, and note that this utility is still in beta form. You may need to force VSync to Off in your graphics card's control panel for it to work properly, but if it doesn't work properly for you, you can try the more basic version of it from here: FPS Compare (old) (106KB).

FPS Compare shows the same scene rendered side by side in a split-screen arrangement, but each side is running at a different frame rate. When launching the new FPS Compare program, I recommend pressing F2 to change the scene to one more familiar to gaming. Now by staring at the middle of your screen, you should be able to detect that the portion on the left (at ~60FPS) appears smoother than the portion on the right (at ~30FPS). Even if the difference is not major to your eyes, many people do notice that there is at least some difference - something which refutes the fact that human eyes cannot notice differences in smoothness at an FPS over 30.
Most people will see that 60 fps is much smoother than 30 fps.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
373 Posts
The human eye doesnt see frames. So theoretically we can see infinite fps, but whether or not we would notice the difference between say 100Hz and 600Hz.... well its probably unlikely.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,611 Posts
This just in... Everyone is different. Some people won't see over 30fps, some people don't notice the difference in lossless audio.

There is no one rule that fits everyone.

Sent from my Oxygen HTC Desire using Tapatalk
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,257 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detahmaio View Post

of course 60 is smoother who could deny that?
true but still an interesting read
@Riou thanks for sharing this +rep
smile.gif
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,574 Posts
When you don't have enough money for a new graphics card and all your friends are showing off theirs, that's when suddenly no human can see past 30fps.
wink.gif
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
512 Posts
I see in 1000000000000000x1000000000000000 resolution and 10000fps
tongue.gif


You can't apply the properties of a screen to our eyes. As someone else said, we only can say whether we notice the difference.

Also, 60fps would look like a slideshow to a duck.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,510 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by leafan101 View Post

I see in 1000000000000000x1000000000000000 resolution and 10000fps
tongue.gif

You can't apply the properties of a screen to our eyes. As someone else said, we only can say whether we notice the difference.
Also, 60fps would look like a slideshow to a duck.
hmmm.. so your saying I need to eat moar duck right?

There can be ONLY ONE

198
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
373 Posts
DUN DUN DUN And so the NinjaDuck runs into the distance...

!!!EATING DUCKS IS IMMORAL!!!

Feathered friends aren't supposed to be edible
wink.gif


But back on topic... :L We dont see frames its just whether or not we notice any difference. I suppose in theory the limit (and bottleneck i suppose
wink.gif
)
is how long it takes your brain to translate the input from the eye into a visible image.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,006 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
373 Posts
Yes but that will be noticeable by the time you get to say the difference between 120Hz and 600Hz there will be very little if any noticeable difference. Because at 120Hz it would seem almost fluid.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
15,004 Posts
I remember doing a test some time ago on a Trinitron CRT screen set to 120Hz, and I was able to discern steps on the movement up to 92 FPS.

It was pretty obvious that 30 FPS was bullcrap.

@ljason8eg: Ah yeah, good ol' 1st crysis... I played it at 28 FPS and didn't notice it to be choppy at all... Skryim at 30 FPS looks terribly choppy on the other hand o_O
 

·
Watercooled Railgun
Joined
·
4,638 Posts
If 30 FPS's are the limit, then why the best gaming monitors are 120 Hz?

Difference is greatly noticeable.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,238 Posts
Its good that awareness of this is spreading. A good near constant 60 FPS is almost a must for me (well I don't mind the occasional dip below 40) even so the 80Hz of ye olde CRT is still missed
rolleyes.gif
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,366 Posts
Thank you !

I keep telling this to people who use the argument 'Movies aren't more than 30 fps, they are smooth blablabla'
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
373 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bit_reaper View Post

Its good that awareness of this is spreading. A good near constant 60 FPS is almost a must for me (well I don't mind the occasional dip below 40) even so the 80Hz of ye olde CRT is still missed
rolleyes.gif
Lol trying gaming at 10fps... (Minecraft on my inspiron laptop)
 
1 - 20 of 82 Posts
Top