|Thats rediculous. Instead of piling on cores, which will generate more heat....why don't they try to develop something new? Its the MHZ war, re-birthed as cores.|
Originally Posted by Higgins
this is for servers, XP Home/Pro cant really even fully use dual core at the moment. but Windows Server editions are written for multiple cores, so it can use four, or 16 cores with the same efficientcy. Besides, AMD's server CPUs have a better rep in the server world the the Xeons.
OH, the new world super computer by IBM is being built with like 1400 Opterons... no Xeons Oh Snap!
Sweet find though.
Originally Posted by HrnyGoat
Thats probably because IBM had already planned it before Intel had released its Core 2 architecture. Funny that IBM isnt using its own Power5 or CELL processors - must not be as good as the Opterons