Joined
·
4,594 Posts
Quote:

..appear to be 31_N (the underscore is presumed). Which means it is a 3.1GHz sample. Then again it might be a 34 or a 24. Or simply forged. If 31 is the case,this puts its throughput for CB roughly at ivy bridge levels.Which would be perfectly acceptable (especially since CB is heavily Intel sponsored and biased ,I would not expect AMD to get nearly as good SMT scaling as intel here) if it wasn't for that Fritz result. A Ryzen 3.1GHz at 17693 might be passable depending on what 6900k scores at what turbo frequency. A [email protected] dishing that score would be rather bad though. Then again I haven't got much insight on Fritz bench nuances.
I figured as much but I would like to see the actual CPU in that freq. Earlier in this thread I had doubt this result comes from a Ryzen because CPU ID did not match any older AMD processors. Now I believe it is one of the ES units we have see floating around. As a matter of fact the last characters here...
..appear to be 31_N (the underscore is presumed). Which means it is a 3.1GHz sample. Then again it might be a 34 or a 24. Or simply forged. If 31 is the case,this puts its throughput for CB roughly at ivy bridge levels.Which would be perfectly acceptable (especially since CB is heavily Intel sponsored and biased ,I would not expect AMD to get nearly as good SMT scaling as intel here) if it wasn't for that Fritz result. A Ryzen 3.1GHz at 17693 might be passable depending on what 6900k scores at what turbo frequency. A [email protected] dishing that score would be rather bad though. Then again I haven't got much insight on Fritz bench nuances.