[spidermohmd1]

Source

 

[Open1Your1Eyes0]

Not bad if true. Pretty random source though.

Seems reasonable enough like GTX280 vs. HD4870 was about the same amount of difference in performance.

 

[Setzer]

I didn't think non-english sources were allowed on OCN.

Anyways, it contains only of those 4 pictures, all which could easily be made up.

I call fake, no matter how much I would like this to be true

 

[TFL Replica]

Images aren't loading for me.

 

[surfbumb]

lol at the source...the first graph has AA and is basically even for that game...far cry is probably built by nvidia...not like i take these graphs seriously anyway.

 

[003]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setzer I call fake, no matter how much I would like this to be true

They are not fake but FC2 has always done better on Nvidia, and notice it's without AA. Then on DiRT 2 it doesn't say the resolution

 

[JTD92]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Open1Your1Eyes0 Not bad if true. Pretty random source though. Seems reasonable enough like GTX280 vs. HD4870 was about the same amount of difference in performance.

I thought the it was GTX260 vs. 4870 and GTX280 vs. 4870X2

 

[Mr.BSEL]

Here is the the thread where the pictures originated from.

http://translate.google.com/translat...&sl=auto&tl=en

 

[xd_1771]

Oh man. The 480 wins by a mile

 

[Open1Your1Eyes0]

Quote:

Originally Posted by JTD92 I thought the it was GTX260 vs. 4870 and GTX280 vs. 4870X2

Yes the HD4870 is compared to GTX260 as equal and GTX280 is compared to an overclocked HD4890 as equal. I'm referring to the above comparison as GTX280 (being the GTX480) and HD4870 (being the HD5870). It's about the same difference.

 

[jrharvey]

Great if its true. Would like to see more results though.

 

[saulin]

Quote:

Originally Posted by spidermohmd1 Source

That seems better than what I would expect. Not bad if it's true!

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfbumb lol at the source...the first graph has AA and is basically even for that game...far cry is probably built by nvidia...not like i take these graphs seriously anyway.

Yeah because 38=46.4

 

[byardz]

Nvidia FTW

I knew people who had no patience (58xx owners) would regret their purchase for jumping on the Dx11 bandwagon too early.

Nvidia has a winner and ATi is finished.

Expect to see alot of 58xx for sale on Ebay.

 

[Open1Your1Eyes0]

Further leaked GTX470 Pics

 

[nsilva]

I think a 5870 gets a lot more than 75 FPS average on 1680x1050.

 

[MrDeodorant]

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003 They are not fake but FC2 has always done better on Nvidia, and notice it's without AA. Then on DiRT 2 it doesn't say the resolution

Well said.

 

[Toonshorty]

Remember that drivers make a huge difference.

Those results will be a little off since the GTX 480 will be on RC/Beta drivers and the HD 5870 will most likely be on 10.2's giving it a decent FPS boost after the drivers have matured.

If you look at it that way, the GTX 480 will only get quicker. So a positive outlook for nVidia, until the price is seen, then it isn't so good.

 

[saulin]

Quote:

Originally Posted by nsilva I think a 5870 gets a lot more than 75 FPS average on 1680x1050.

Well with no AA. It gets 105 fps at that resolution. Of course who knows what the test system is.

 

[Core2uu]

If those are true then W0000000T!

My price-drop senses are tingling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by byardz Nvidia FTW I knew people who had no patience (58xx owners) would regret their purchase for jumping on the Dx11 bandwagon too early. Nvidia has a winner and ATi is finished. Expect to see alot of 58xx for sale on Ebay.

 

[Hawk777th]

If these are for real how does that compare to a 295?