You should be going SSD even if its 64GB. I dont see the point of hybrid drivers.
You can still use a single platter WD 1TB Blue Caviar, and instead of using an SSD to improve performance, why not go with a RamDisk or other software utilities to cache?Originally Posted by Jayjr1105
It seems hybrids are starting to catch up in popularity however I still kind of turn my nose up at them because they are 5400rpm and 2.5". Are people still preferring a fast single platter drive like a WD Blue WD10EZEX or is Hybrid the way to go if you aren't going full out SSD?
Price per GB, zero "tweaking" needed, size? Not everyone has a large/file media server at home. Besides SSD prices are up compared to where they were last year at this time making hybrids more appealing.
Hybrid drives (SSHDs) make sense for use in inexpensive and, possibly, mid-range laptops, notebooks, etc. that have room for only one drive. While one could put in a large SSD, it doesn't make much sense to do so when the cost of the SSD approaches or exceeds the cost of the SSD. One could replace a 5400 rpm HDD for less than an SSD and gain a little bit of speed but that will reduce battery life. A SSHD is a compromise that will decrease boot times and speed up program loading, albeit not as dramatically as a SSD, for a much lower price. The older SSHDs had some problems but the current ones have been getting decent reviews, about the same as the better HDDs.