Unless all you play is crysis, your machine will tear through any game at 1980x1200, ive done it on much slower components (9800gtx+ and a 9850be not overclocked). So anyway, asus monitors are decent, but the price difference between all the monitors in the 19-22inch range is so neglible that I would definitely go for a 22 inch at least, although with specs like yours i really would not be hesitant to go 24inch, the difference between gaming on a 24 inch and a 22 inch is just...night and day.
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
4
Quote:
Thanks man, haha as matter of fact me and my younger brother both play almost nothing but Crysis (a little GTA4 and Fallout 3 on the side
![]()
) and I cant get another GTX 260, PSU, and mobo to go SLI anytime soon, so I'm stuck with the single card solution, for now.
The thing is (and I guess you could call me a frame-per-second hound for this
![]()
) but I just don't want to take the chance of getting alot less fps at 1980x1200 than I get now at my measly 1152x864 res. Anyway somebody else here pointed out to me the otrher day in another thread, that I could get a 22" at the same 1600 res so I will probably just go for that size instead.
Thanks for the reply and help rep+
![]()
Originally Posted by soulsonicforce Unless all you play is crysis, your machine will tear through any game at 1980x1200, ive done it on much slower components (9800gtx+ and a 9850be not overclocked). So anyway, asus monitors are decent, but the price difference between all the monitors in the 19-22inch range is so neglible that I would definitely go for a 22 inch at least, although with specs like yours i really would not be hesitant to go 24inch, the difference between gaming on a 24 inch and a 22 inch is just...night and day. |
The thing is (and I guess you could call me a frame-per-second hound for this
Thanks for the reply and help rep+
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
