I am quickly finding myself caring less and less about gaming (I haven't gamed at all in about two weeks, and the last time was only for about an hour), and I am more interested in raw power for experimenting and tweaking around with various things. I want to have a powerful machine for powerful tasks, like video rendering and photo editing, not that I do any of these things, but I might. I have a second HD 4850 that will likely be coming back very soon from my RMA, and I will be going back to crossfire then. However, I am musing with the idea of trading for a set of nvidia cards possibly sometime down the road. I want to know which cards work better at workstation apps.
I am also extremely interested in firestream and CUDA. I know that CUDA can be coded with simple C, but I don't know if it is quite so easy to do so with firestream. I was wondering which is overall better, or what the main features of each are.
PhysX is one aspect of CUDA. I am more interested in the programs and performance gains of CUDA over ATI's Stream in video rendering, photo editing, and power house applications.
In terms of hardware and pure rendering power, i would think Nvidia cards would be better. Just because the geforce/quadro cards have higher SP counts and fatter memory bandwidth, it should give them an edge in video/3D rendering.
I dont know too much about the programming aspect tho.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could
be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Overclock.net
A forum community dedicated to overclocking enthusiasts and testing the limits of computing. Come join the discussion about computing, builds, collections, displays, models, styles, scales, specifications, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!