Overclock.net banner
1 - 20 of 137 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
I'm pleased to host the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark competition. SoTR is an excellent way to test how your memory overclock translates to gaming performance. It's also a useful tool for comparing DDR4 to DDR5.

Rules:
-Entries will be ranked by average FPS.
-Must self-report system info in spreadsheet below.
-Post a screenshot using the same settings as the screenshot below.
-Use full version of the game (not the demo) with any build version.
-Must not exit the benchmark early to boost average FPS. It will be obvious if you do.

Suggestions:
-Disable e-cores
-Disable hyperthreading
-Disable RE-Bar
-This is not a stability competition, so run those clocks as high as you can.

Average FPS
RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
1Simzak39112900KAsus Tuf D45300DDR4G.Skill F4-3600C16D-32GTR400015-16-16-28-3286900XT
2geriatricpollywog37312900KAsus Strix D45734DDR4G.Skill F4-4000C14D-32GTEG429314-15-15-28-2403090
3matique36812900KZ690i Unify5500DDR5Kingston 6000c40 (Hynix)700030-41-41-283090
4Arni9036112900KZ690 Unify-X5520DDR5 Corsair CMT32GX5M2X6200C36682730-39-41-30-2T3090
5Domdtxdissar3535950XUnify X MAX~5000DDR4G.Skill F4-4000C14-16GTZR380013-14-12-22-34-2243090
6Simzak34110900KMSI Gaming Carbon5200DDR4G.Skill F4-3600C16D-32GTR440016-16-16-28-2886900XT
7Theo1643135900XAsus Xhair VIII Hero5000DDR4G.Skill F4-3600C16Q-32GTZR373316-16-16-32-2593080ti
8sugi0lover31111900KAsus Z590 Apex5400DDR4G.Skill F4-4000C14D-32GTRG401013-14-14-28-2243090
9zebra_hun30210850KAsus Z490 Apex5400DDR4G.Skill F4-3200C14D-32GTZR440017-17-17-37-3413080
10techenth30110900KMWI Tomahawk5300DDR4G.Skill F4-4266C17D-32GTZRB440016-17-17-36-3203080
11Luggage30058000XMSI X570 Unify5050 PBODDR4G.Skill F4-3600C14-32GVKA380014-15-14-26-2402080ti
12kryptonfly2566950XAsus X99 Strix4646DDR4G.Skill F4-3000C14Q-32GTZR340013-12-13-26-2203090
13Taraquin2505600XGB B550m S2H~4600DDR4Patriot Viper 4400cl19 2x8400016-16-16-29-2803060ti
14JSHamlet2342495960XASUS X99-A4625DDR4G.Skill F4-3733C17-8GTZSW333313-13-13-26-2342 x 980ti

Average CPU Game FPS
RankUserCPU Game FPS
1Simzak391
2geriatricpollywog373
3Domdtxdissar353
4Simzak341
5Theo164313
6sugi0lover311
7Luggage308
8zebra_hun302
9techenth291
10Taraquin265
11kryptonfly256
12JSHamlet234252


Font Parallel Engineering Terrestrial plant Software
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
Not a record breaking run or anything but I think this is really good for an average 10900k

RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
Simzak34110900KMSI Gaming Carbon5200DDR4Gskill F4-3600C16D-32GTRS440016-16-16-28-2886900XT

Font Slope Parallel Screenshot Terrestrial plant
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Not a record breaking run or anything but I think this is really good for an average 10900k

RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
Simzak34110900KMSI Gaming Carbon5200DDR4Gskill F4-3600C16D-32GTRS440016-16-16-28-2886900XT

View attachment 2548440
341 is fantastic for any CPU, let alone one that’s 2 years old. With cold water and 5.5 all core you would probably hit 355+.

I see you are using the latest non-beta build. I just tested this build and got 372 fps so it seems build version doesn’t matter anymore.
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Simzak

·
Registered
Joined
·
718 Posts
My old benchrun:

RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
Domdtxdissar3505950XUnify X MAX~5000DDR4G.Skill F4-4000C14-16GTZR380013-14-12-22-34-2243090
Font Technology Engineering Parallel Software


Recorded video of the run and settings:

edit changed my table from 353fps to 350fps as i first thought we were ranking cpu average fps. (was running gfx at stock clocks for this bench)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
JSHamlet2342445960XASUS X99-A4500DDR4G.Skill F4-3733C17-8GTZSW333313-13-13-26-2342X 980TI

EDIT: It looks like I forgot to turn off TAA and enable exclusive fullscreen. I doubt either of those would significantly affect the CPU Game numbers.
View attachment 2548480
The screenshot shows 213 but the table says 244
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
405 Posts
The screenshot shows 213 but the table says 244
I thought we were using CPU Game. In any event, I'll run it again with the correct settings and re-submit.


RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
JSHamlet2342495960XASUS X99-A4625DDR4G.Skill F4-3733C17-8GTZSW333313-13-13-26-2342X 980TI

Font Terrestrial plant Screenshot Slope Space
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
405 Posts
Can U show your SLI benchmark run as well? If possible could you please run the SLI benchmark at both 1080p and 1440p with maxed graphics settings and show us the results?
That run was with SLI enabled. I'll run it at the highest preset and post results later on. It should be around 150fps at 1080P and 100fps at 1440P.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
934 Posts
Font Parallel Slope Engineering Technology


Suggestion: If you want to compare DDR4 vs DDR5 use the CPU Game avg\min, not total avg as this is much more dependent on what GPU you use :) If you look at my result you see that you need a 3080+ GPU to avoid being GPU bound. I can re-run with TAA disabled later and OC GPU if total avg fps is what you want :)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 · (Edited)
View attachment 2548624

Suggestion: If you want to compare DDR4 vs DDR5 use the CPU Game avg\min, not total avg as this is much more dependent on what GPU you use :) If you look at my result you see that you need a 3080+ GPU to avoid being GPU bound. I can re-run with TAA disabled later and OC GPU if total avg fps is what you want :)
Average CPU Render doesn't 100% correlate with better average FPS when there is no GPU limit. Here my average CPU render is higher than my run in the original post, but average FPS is lower. My CPU and ram were clocked higher in the original post.

And yes, please run with TAA disabled if you want me to add results to the table. I want to keep the settings constant.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
934 Posts
Average CPU Render doesn't 100% correlate with better average FPS when there is no GPU limit. Here my average CPU render is higher than my run in the original post, but average FPS is lower. My CPU and ram were clocked higher in the original post.

And yes, please run with TAA disabled if you want me to add results to the table. I want to keep the settings constant.

View attachment 2548625
I said CPU Game, not CPU render. Look at your CPU Game: 345fps, look at your avg fps: 345fps :) CPU Game is the fps the CPU actually produces, CPU Render is background processes etc and don`t matter for avg fps. If GPU Bound is 0% then CPU Game avg will be identical to avg fps. If partly GPU bound then avg fps will always be below CPU Game avg :) If I lower my resolution more I can get 267fps avg if my GPU Bound drops to 0%.

You should decide if you want this to be a CPU test or GPU test. I`m down with both, but reading your opening post it seems like you want to investigate CPU\ram-performance, and then you should use CPU Game avg, not total avg fps as the latter is largely impacted by your GPU unless you have rtx 3080+.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
I said CPU Game, not CPU render. Look at your CPU Game: 345fps, look at your avg fps: 345fps :) CPU Game is the fps the CPU actually produces, CPU Render is background processes etc and don`t matter for avg fps. If GPU Bound is 0% then CPU Game avg will be identical to avg fps. If partly GPU bound then avg fps will always be below CPU Game avg :) If I lower my resolution more I can get 267fps avg if my GPU Bound drops to 0%.

You should decide if you want this to be a CPU test or GPU test. I`m down with both, but reading your opening post it seems like you want to investigate CPU\ram-performance, and then you should use CPU Game avg, not total avg fps as the latter is largely impacted by your GPU unless you have rtx 3080+.
Ah I see. In the 10900K/11900K/12900K threads, we frequently posted screenshots and compared average FPS, but we all had 3090s.

I'll create a separate ranking for CPU game. Good suggestion!
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Taraquin

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
I said CPU Game, not CPU render. Look at your CPU Game: 345fps, look at your avg fps: 345fps :) CPU Game is the fps the CPU actually produces, CPU Render is background processes etc and don`t matter for avg fps. If GPU Bound is 0% then CPU Game avg will be identical to avg fps. If partly GPU bound then avg fps will always be below CPU Game avg :) If I lower my resolution more I can get 267fps avg if my GPU Bound drops to 0%.

You should decide if you want this to be a CPU test or GPU test. I`m down with both, but reading your opening post it seems like you want to investigate CPU\ram-performance, and then you should use CPU Game avg, not total avg fps as the latter is largely impacted by your GPU unless you have rtx 3080+.
Can you provide system info for table?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
934 Posts
Can you provide system info for table?
I can rerun without TAA, gets better score, but you can set this for now :)

RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
Taraquin214\2675600XGB B550m S2H~4600DDR4Patriot Viper 4400cl19 2x8400016-16-16-29-45-2803060ti
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,672 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
I can rerun without TAA, gets better score, but you can set this for now :)

RankUserFPSCPUMotherboardCore SpeedDDR4/DDR5RAM KitRAM SpeedRAM TimingsGPU
Taraquin214\2675600XGB B550m S2H~4600DDR4Patriot Viper 4400cl19 2x8400016-16-16-29-45-2803060ti
No, need same settings
 
  • Rep+
Reactions: Taraquin
1 - 20 of 137 Posts
Top