Blown out of proportion, mountain from a mole hill etc etcRofl so the huge thread on here is bs?
No, though I think you are looking into this far deeper than you should be, you have been asking about Ryzen 5000 series CPUs and motherboards far longer than I care to remember!Is there any feedback regarding the 21xx chips?
Problem is people overclocking memory who don't know how to overclock memory. 1800FCLK is a reasonable expectation on Zen 2, with a bit more on Zen 3...though some samples of each can certainly handle more. If the memory is capable of matching this, but the system has issues, it's probably user error.I mean there's that. People assum that cl14 3200 isn't overclocking when in reality anything over jdec standards is overclocking lol. But then thats pretty crappy and kills performance if you can only run jdec speeds and timings.
Are you sure it is not the issue with running 4 sticks of RAM? Have you tried to run 2 sticks of RAM for a few days and check if the same thing happens?Sometime 2033/2066 post fine, sometimes 2033 goes funky, at the same time when 2033 goes funky a previous unpostable FCLK frequency, 1966, is able to post !!
Thats why I think there is a sync issue somewhere ....
Nope, nothing to do with RAM, have done extensive testing, with 2 and 4 sticksAre you sure it is not the issue with running 4 sticks of RAM? Have you tried to run 2 sticks of RAM for a few days and check if the same thing happens?
Remember if it last aslong as the warranty is they did their job. Idc what kinda technology they used. 1.5 on 7nm at 80c is a no bueno for me. Why dony you test it out for a year or twolol ^^^^
I trust to believe AMD know more about TSMC process technology than what you have posted
![]()
I might not be in the know, but I haven't heard of any widespread stability or performance issues with Zen 3. One would think the return rates would be higher if there were issues and that doesn't seem to be the case.
Anecdotally, I have seen threads on OCN of people having a tough time replicating reviewer benchmark performance, but that is almost always the case with any launch hardware.
AMD is selling bad 5950X as 5800X ????I'm currently running a 5800X with -30 undervolt and +200 OC PBO2. 1933 1:1 FLCK:MEMCLK fully stable, no WHEAs. Check sig for details.
The only issue I have with my chip is that it's running hot (90C thorttling with P95 small FFTs), maybe because it's one of those with a dual CCXs (failed 5950X).
It's no different than memory. The faster binned are same as the slower binned ones. The slower ones just didnt pass the test.AMD is selling bad 5950X as 5800X ????![]()
Yes, apparently there are two versions of the 5800X - a) 1x CCX, 8C b) 2x CCX, 8C each, one CCX disabled (basically a 5950X with one failed CCX).AMD is selling bad 5950X as 5800X ????![]()
How nice would it be if it can be unlocked like the Phenom II days.Yes, apparently there are two versions of the 5800X - a) 1x CCX, 8C b) 2x CCX, 8C each, one CCX disabled (basically a 5950X with one failed CCX).
Exactly this. I bought 5800X in december. After few weeks of nightmare with all the whea errors, random reeboots and crashes, I am back to my good rock solid i9. My 5800X is covered by dust in a corner...No one can really answer that as there are thousands with the whea errors and fclk issues. And that's only reported problems. Not the ones that are just flat out returning units
I'm sincere, I think about that too.Exactly this. I bought 5800X in december. After few weeks of nightmare with all the whea errors, random reeboots and crashes, I am back to my good rock solid i9. My 5800X is covered by dust in a corner...