[kairi_zeroblade]

this was the result last night's bench on the 4850x2

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

any more??

hmm i toltally agree but it means its nonsense making a single card 2 GPU's on it..

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunion Doesn't look like you had the X2 oc'd for the 19,255 run. Run some game benchmarks with AA and you'll see the X2 pull away, or if you have the advanced 06 version, add AA.

ok will try later..its OC'd to 700/1130 wrong readings from catalyst..but its really OC'd if not OC'd i only get 18k'ish scores..

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOmega Have you run a any other benchmarks to see what the difference is. Try running the Crysis benchmark @ 16xAA. If you don't have crysis download the demo and you can benchmark it using that. Run the benchmark in CSS the ingame one. I know that your frame rates will be super high, just curious of the difference between the 2. If you can think of other benchmarks run those. Dont base your results on just 1 benchmark. Good luck

will try this one too..

in gaming the 4850x2 is more responsive even on stock clocks but in benching it really sucks..

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

yup seems like that its cranking up with 4gb mems and with AA filtering added..compared to the 38xx series..but the CPU scores still goes low

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

both runs were under catalyst 9.2..that was really strange since it really pulled my CPU scores..

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

i really need your opinions on this one seriously..

1 more thing does benching in Vista can give a possibility to up or lessen down my scores??

 

[kairi_zeroblade]

@tehmaggot
i am on your sig profile ATM..